Mission Grey Daily Brief - October 28, 2025
Executive Summary
The past 24 hours have been marked by mounting global economic challenges and deepening geopolitical tensions. China's economy continues to decelerate, with new US and EU tariffs compounding its property sector crisis and undermining the country’s growth model. Meanwhile, the US and EU imposed major new sanctions on Russia’s top oil companies in a bid to pressure Moscow over the Ukraine war, sending global energy markets into short-term volatility. Brazil, facing inflation just above the Central Bank’s target, has seen market projections soften after a diplomatic thaw with the US, although monetary policy remains tight. Across Asia, calls for open trade at the ASEAN summit compete with rising protectionism, as world leaders grapple with policy uncertainties and supply chain disruptions. The coming weeks will be decisive for international businesses as markets look for signals of stabilization or further escalation.
Analysis
China’s Economic Slowdown and Tariff Pressures
China’s third-quarter GDP growth slowed to 4.8%, marking its weakest pace in a year. While annual growth remains nominally near Beijing’s “around 5%” target, the composition of growth is skewed toward exports and high-tech manufacturing, as domestic consumption and real estate continue to drag. Retail sales only rose 3% in September and fixed asset investment excluding real estate fell for the first time since the pandemic, underlining persistent weakness in private sector confidence and household spending. Apartment prices in major cities are down as much as 40% from their 2021 peaks, signaling a deepening property bust that erodes household wealth and spending power. [1][2][3][4][5]
Escalating trade tensions are hitting China externally as well. The US, under the Trump administration, has ramped up tariffs—145% on Chinese goods, with China retaliating at 125%. These moves, set to cut global merchandise trade by at least 0.2% this year, have driven exports to the US down 27% year-on-year in September. While China has succeeded in redirecting some exports to Southeast Asia and Africa (exports to Africa increased 56% year-on-year), this pivot comes at a cost—firms are forced into fierce price competition, reducing profit margins and pressuring wages. [1][2][6]
Policymakers in Beijing are now debating further demand-side stimulus and targeted support, particularly for housing and consumption, as nominal GDP growth remains subdued at 3.7%. Industrial production growth was a rare bright spot, especially in high-tech (up nearly 10%) and equipment manufacturing (+9.7%). But with new US and EU tariffs on the horizon and global supply chains under threat, long-term economic strategy is shifting toward resilience, technological self-sufficiency, and digital expansion. [1][2]
Russian Oil Sanctions and Energy Market Reactions
In a coordinated move, the US and EU introduced full blocking sanctions against Russia’s top oil producers Rosneft and Lukoil, targeting more than 30 subsidiaries. The aim: to cut off revenues funding Russia’s war in Ukraine and force Moscow toward a peace deal. These companies collectively account for roughly 70% of Russian crude exports, or about 3.1 million barrels per day—nearly 6% of global supply. [7][8][9][10][11][12]
While Russian exporters have previously routed oil through “shadow fleets” and pivoted sales to China and India (China imported 109 million tonnes last year; India 88 million tonnes, both record highs), Washington’s new approach leverages secondary sanctions. With these, any global financial institution facilitating Russian oil trade now risks being cut off from the US banking system. Refinery executives in India suggest transactions will be severely impacted, raising costs and pressuring oil buyers to diversify. Initial market reactions saw Brent crude rally almost 4% to $65/barrel and US West Texas Intermediate jump above $60, though analysts expect the rally may be temporary given broader economic headwinds. [7]
The impact on global oil flows will be determined by the willingness of China and India to continue purchasing despite the risk of US financial reprisals. Meanwhile, Europe races to ban Russian LNG and tighten long-running sanctions, fueling uncertainty in energy markets and supply chains. [12][11]
Brazil’s Economic Outlook: Inflation, Rates, and US Relations
Brazil’s central bank just released its latest Boletim Focus bulletin, indicating inflation expectations for 2025 have been revised downward to 4.56%, yet remain slightly above the official target of 4.5%. GDP growth forecasts for 2025 also slipped marginally from 2.17% to 2.16%, with growth seen slowing further into 2026 as global trade and US tariffs weigh on exports. [13][14][15][16][news-search-Focus][17]
The Selic interest rate is holding firm at 15%, with expectations for a gradual reduction to 10% by 2028 as inflation moderates. The Brazilian real is trading near R$5.41 against the dollar, supported by foreign capital flows—though risk remains from fiscal pressures and external trade shocks. [18][19] Recent market optimism reflected the positive tone of a diplomatic meeting between Presidents Lula and Trump at the ASEAN summit, which eased concerns about bilateral tariffs and prompted a drop in government bond yields. [20] However, analysts caution that monetary policy remains tight and could stifle expansion if rates stay high for too long. [21]
From ASEAN to Europe: Calls for Open Trade Clashing with Protectionism
At the ASEAN summit in Malaysia, China’s Premier Li Qiang called for regional leaders to oppose US protectionism and maintain open trade. The rhetoric aligns with China’s effort to reorient trade flows toward Asia, Africa, and Belt and Road partners, but US tariffs continue to dominate discussion. President Trump signed several trade agreements with regional partners but left tariffs unchanged, keeping Canadian and Brazilian leaders engaged in tense negotiations over future arrangements. European diplomats voiced concerns over China’s expanding export controls on critical raw materials—a reminder that the global trade system is being reshaped by competition for strategic commodities and supply chain resilience. [22]
The ASEAN-bloc-led RCEP, a mega trading group covering 30% of global GDP, is being promoted as a buffer against US tariffs and supply chain disruptions, although its effectiveness is not yet clear in the face of persistent protectionism and strategic rivalry.
Conclusions
The current cycle of economic slowdown, trade disputes, and sanctions is straining the old architecture of globalization. China's export pivots and targeted stimulus may temporarily stabilize growth, but long-term sustainability hinges on reform and innovation—both constrained by authoritarian policy choices and persistent property malaise. Russian energy sanctions signal rising costs and volatility for global markets, as the transactional calculus between strategic interests and financial exposure deepens. Brazil, though showing resilience and pragmatic diplomacy, confronts the balancing act of inflation, rates, and trade friction as external conditions shift.
Are we witnessing the dawn of a new era of de-globalization and regionalization, or will diplomatic efforts at upcoming summits yield meaningful de-escalation? For international investors and businesses, the imperative is not just to hedge against risk but to identify which markets offer genuine stability, openness, and transparency in such turbulent times. How will ethical governance, rule of law, and supply chain integrity weigh in the calculus of global business decisions going forward? The next moves by policymakers and multinational enterprises may set the tone for years to come.
Further Reading:
Themes around the World:
CBAM and green compliance pressure
EU officials explicitly linked deeper trade integration to climate alignment, warning Turkish exporters about Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism exposure without compatible carbon pricing and reporting. Carbon-cost pass-through could hit steel, cement, aluminum and chemicals, driving urgent decarbonization and MRV investments.
Suez/Red Sea shipping normalization
Carrier returns to Suez (Maersk–Hapag-Lloyd Gemini) signal gradual reopening after Houthi-linked disruptions. Suez traffic and revenue rebounded (revenue +24.5%, traffic +9%). However, renewed regional escalation could force Cape diversions, raising lead times and costs.
Yen volatility and intervention risk
Post-election fiscal expansion, rising JGB yields and BoJ normalization keep USD/JPY near 160, with officials signaling readiness to intervene. FX swings can whipsaw importer margins, repatriation flows and hedging costs, affecting pricing, procurement and investment timing.
Domestic Demand and Housing Fragility
Authorities remain cautious about easing as housing-related financial-stability risks persist, constraining policy flexibility. Weaker domestic demand limits revenue growth for consumer-facing businesses while keeping labor and input costs sticky, and it heightens sensitivity to external shocks and currency swings.
Korea semiconductor industrial policy reboot
A new Special Act creates a presidential commission, dedicated funding and cluster support to strengthen the entire chip supply chain. Regulatory streamlining and regional incentives can attract foreign suppliers, but unresolved labor flexibility debates may constrain rapid R&D and ramp-ups.
Regulação de dados e compliance LGPD
A Câmara aprovou MP que transforma a ANPD em agência reguladora, com carreira própria e maior capacidade de fiscalização. Isso tende a elevar enforcement, custos de conformidade e exigências contratuais, especialmente em cadeias com compartilhamento internacional de dados.
Energy revenues and fiscal strain
Sanctions and enforcement are compressing Russia’s hydrocarbon cashflows: January oil-and-gas tax revenue fell to 393bn rubles, down from 587bn in December and 1.12tr a year earlier. Moscow is raising VAT to 22% and borrowing more, worsening domestic demand and payment risk.
Semiconductor geopolitics and reshoring
TSMC’s expanded US investment deepens supply-chain bifurcation as Washington tightens technology controls and seeks onshore capacity. Companies must manage dual compliance regimes, IP protection, export licensing, and supplier localization decisions across US, Taiwan, and China markets.
Import quotas for fuels tighten
Indonesia’s import caps are affecting private retailers, with Shell reporting work with government on 2026 fuel import quotas amid station shortages. Coupled with policy to stop diesel import permits for private stations, firms face supply disruptions, higher working capital needs, and reliance on Pertamina.
Nuclear talks uncertainty and snapback
Muscat talks resumed but remain far apart on enrichment and scope, while sanctions continue alongside diplomacy. The risk of negotiation breakdown—or further UN/EU/U.S. “snapback” measures—creates unstable planning horizons for contracts, project finance, and long-cycle investments in Iran-linked trade.
LNG export surge and permitting pipeline
The US is expanding LNG exports and new capacity proposals, supporting allies’ energy security but tightening domestic gas balances in some scenarios. Energy-intensive industries face price uncertainty; traders and shippers should watch FERC/DOE approvals, contract structures, and infrastructure bottlenecks.
Reforma tributária e transição IVA
A reforma do consumo cria um IVA dual (CBS/IBS) e muda créditos, alíquotas efetivas e compliance. A transição longa aumenta risco operacional: necessidade de reconfigurar ERPs, pricing e contratos, além de revisar incentivos setoriais e cadeias de fornecimento interestaduais.
EU Customs Union Modernization
Turkey and the EU are moving to “pave the way” for modernizing the 1995 Customs Union, alongside better implementation and renewed EIB activity. An update could expand coverage and improve regulatory alignment, supporting nearshoring, automotive/appliances supply chains, and cross-border investment planning.
Higher-for-longer interest rates
The Federal Reserve is pausing further rate cuts with inflation still pressured partly by tariffs. Elevated funding costs and a stronger risk premium weigh on capex, real estate, and leveraged trade finance, while FX volatility complicates pricing, hedging, and repatriation strategies.
Macroeconomic slowdown, FX sensitivity
The NBU cut the key rate to 15% while warning war damage reduces GDP growth to about 1.8% and pressures the balance of payments. Elevated uncertainty affects pricing, payment terms, working-capital needs, and currency hedging for importers and exporters.
Banking hidden risks and real-estate spillovers
Banks’ loan guarantees rose 19% to VND 52 trillion in the first nine months, outpacing equity growth and increasing off-balance-sheet exposure (e.g., SBLCs). Thin capital buffers heighten systemic risk; credit tightening could hit construction, suppliers and consumer demand.
Trade policy alignment with US partners
Ongoing US–Taiwan trade and tariff frameworks and broader partner initiatives shape market access and rules of origin. Exporters should reassess tariff exposure, documentation, and sourcing, while investors monitor regulatory convergence in digital trade, standards, and customs facilitation.
Disinflation and tight monetary policy
Annual inflation eased to 30.65% in January, but monthly CPI jumped 4.8%, underscoring sticky services and food risks. The central bank projects 2026 inflation at 15–21% and maintains a cautious stance, affecting credit costs, pricing, and demand planning.
Macroeconomic strain and FX pressure
Logistics disruptions and energy damage are weighing on growth and export receipts. The central bank cut the policy rate to 15% as inflation eased, but expects renewed price pressure and slower disinflation; port attacks may reduce Q1 export earnings by roughly $1 billion, stressing FX markets.
Energy tariffs and circular-debt risk
Power pricing, gas availability, and circular-debt reforms directly affect industrial competitiveness. Recent tariff cuts for industry may support exports, but ongoing sector restructuring implies continued volatility in energy costs, outages, and subsidy policy—key variables for manufacturing site selection and contracts.
Tasas, inflación y costo financiero
Banxico pausó recortes y mantuvo la tasa en 7% ante choques por IEPS y aranceles a importaciones chinas; además elevó pronósticos de inflación (meta 3% se desplaza a 2027). Esto encarece financiamiento, altera valuaciones y afecta coberturas cambiarias y de tasas.
Санкции против арктического LNG
ЕС предлагает запрет обслуживания LNG‑танкеров и ледоколов, что бьёт по арктическим проектам и логистике. При этом в январе 2026 ЕС купил 92,6% продукции Yamal LNG (1,69 млн т), сохраняя зависимость и создавая волатильность регуляторных решений.
FX regime and pricing pass-through
Authorities emphasize market-driven FX and inflation targeting, reducing reliance on defending a specific rate. For investors and traders, this improves transparency but raises short-term earnings and contract risks via exchange-rate volatility, repricing cycles, and hedging costs.
Massive infrastructure investment pipeline
The government’s Plan Mexico outlines roughly 5.6 trillion pesos through 2030 across energy and transport, including rail, roads and ports. If executed, it could ease logistics bottlenecks for exporters; however, funding structures, permitting timelines and local opposition may delay benefits.
Auto sector reshoring pressures
Canada’s integrated auto supply chain faces U.S. tariff threats on vehicles and parts plus competitiveness challenges versus U.S. incentives and Mexico costs. Companies should reassess North American footprints, content sourcing, and contingency production, especially for EV and battery supply chains.
Energy export logistics bottlenecks
Longer voyages, tankers idling offshore, and ice conditions around Baltic ports are delaying loadings and reducing throughput, while ports face stricter ice-class and escort rules. Combined with sanctions-driven rerouting, this increases freight rates, demurrage disputes, and delivery uncertainty for energy and commodities.
Financial system tightening and liquidity
Banking reforms—phasing out credit quotas and moving toward Basel III—may reprice credit and widen gaps between strong and weak lenders. With credit-to-GDP above 140% and periodic liquidity spikes, corporates may face higher working-capital costs and tougher project financing.
Cyber defense and compliance tightening
Japan is strengthening “active cyberdefense” institutions and pushing tougher security expectations, including in financial and critical infrastructure segments. Multinationals should anticipate higher incident-reporting, supplier security audits, and operational resilience requirements across Japan-based networks.
Gas expansion and contested offshore resources
Saudi Arabia and Kuwait are advancing the Dorra/Durra offshore gas project, targeting 1 bcf/d gas and 84,000 bpd condensate, despite Iran’s claims. EPC and consultancy tenders are moving, creating opportunities but adding geopolitical, legal, and security risk to contracts.
Regulatory divergence in product standards
Ongoing UK–EU divergence—covering conformity marking (UKCA/CE), product safety and sector rules—creates dual-compliance costs. Exporters must manage parallel documentation, testing and labeling, while Northern Ireland arrangements add complexity for distribution models across Great Britain and the EU.
Tighter tech export controls
BIS continues tightening—and sometimes recalibrating—controls on advanced computing, AI chips, and semiconductor equipment tied to China. Firms must manage licensing, end-use checks, and diversion risk through third countries, raising costs and delaying shipments in sensitive tech ecosystems.
Long-term LNG security push
Utilities are locking in fuel amid rising power demand from data centers and AI. QatarEnergy signed a 27‑year deal to supply JERA about 3 mtpa from 2028; Mitsui is nearing an equity stake in North Field South (16 mtpa, ~$17.5bn). Destination clauses affect flexibility.
Industrial decarbonisation via CCUS
The UK is moving carbon capture from planning to build-out: five major CCUS projects reached financial close, with over 100 projects in development and potential 100+ MtCO₂ storage capacity annually by mid‑2030s. Policy clarity and funding pace will shape investment, costs, and competitiveness for heavy industry.
Industrial policy reshapes investment
CHIPS/IRA-style incentives and local-content rules steer capex toward U.S. manufacturing, batteries, and clean tech, while raising compliance complexity for multinationals. Subsidies can improve U.S. project economics, but may trigger trade frictions, retaliation, and fragmented global production strategies.
Netzausbau, Speicher, Genehmigungen
Beschleunigter Ausbau von Übertragungsnetzen und Flexibilitätslösungen wird zentral. Der Bund steigt bei Tennet mit 25,1% ein (bis zu 7,6 Mrd. €). Gleichzeitig bremsen knappe Netzanschlüsse, lange Verfahren und Regelwerkslücken Investitionen in Speicher, Erneuerbare und neue Industrieansiedlungen.
Data localization and cross-border transfers
Data security and personal information rules constrain cross-border data transfers, affecting cloud architectures, HR systems, and analytics. Multinationals may need China-specific data stacks, security assessments, and contractual controls, increasing IT spend while limiting global visibility and centralized operations.