Mission Grey Daily Brief - June 11, 2025
Executive summary
The past 24 hours have brought a decisive shift on the global stage, as the United States and China have managed to halt an escalating trade dispute—at least temporarily—after marathon negotiations in London. This has captured the undivided attention of global markets, supply chain strategists, and international businesses, especially given parallel tariff escalations and legal wrangling involving other major economies like India and the EU. Meanwhile, tensions over US protectionist moves, ripple effects on allies and partners, and new sanctions dynamics surrounding Israel continue to fragment the post-globalisation landscape. Deeper economic data points hint at a slowing world economy, with the OECD now projecting the weakest global growth since 2020, largely due to uncertainty and shifting trade barriers. As multinational firms brace for further volatility, risk mitigation and value alignment are at the forefront of international decision-makers’ minds.
Analysis
US-China Trade Truce: Pressure Valve or Long-Term Solution?
After several weeks of rising tension, the United States and China have agreed to solidify and extend their recent trade truce, following two days of high-level negotiations in London. The outcome is a new ‘framework’ deal, expected to be ratified by President Trump and President Xi soon, that effectively recommits both sides to de-escalation on tariffs and export restrictions—terms originally brokered in Geneva only a month ago but quickly eroded amid ongoing disputes around rare earth minerals and US technology controls[U.S. and China ...][China has a val...][Trump tariffs l...]. Notably, China’s near-monopoly over rare earth exports emerged as a focal bargaining chip, with Beijing’s strategic restraint countered by Washington’s easing of certain export controls—but the US intends to retain curbs on critical tech. Though the mood has improved after the talks, underlying mistrust remains and the potential for future disruption is high, particularly if political rhetoric intensifies or enforcement lapses.
Recent policy moves have included a US extension of its tariff pause on numerous Chinese goods until August 31, 2025, providing temporary relief to importers and consumers and offering a window for further negotiations[Breaking: US Ta...]. However, this gesture cannot obscure the reality that US effective tariff rates on imports have already skyrocketed to 15.4%—the highest since the Great Depression era—triggering significant price increases, supply chain strain, and a measurable slowdown in global trade flows[Global economy ...]. Businesses should remain cautious about over-committing to China for critical components, especially as rare earth minerals and other strategic inputs remain exposed to sudden, non-market intervention or export controls. The fundamental clash—over technology access, supply chain sovereignty, intellectual property, and systemic values—has not been solved, only postponed.
US Protectionism’s Ripple Effects: India, the EU, and Global Growth
While diplomacy with China produces short-term relief, the US administration’s broader trade strategy continues on a protectionist path. On June 4, the US doubled tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, immediately impacting $4.56 billion worth of Indian exports and similar volumes from other partners like the EU[New Tariffs To ...][Key events and ...]. Indian steel is now effectively priced out of the US market, causing consternation in New Delhi and pressing Indian policymakers to seek a bilateral Free Trade Agreement as their most pragmatic route forward[Business News |...].
The OECD now warns that global GDP growth will slow to 2.9% in both 2025 and 2026—a sharp drop from the 3.3% seen in 2024—as a direct result of higher tariffs, increased cost structures, uncertainty, and deteriorating business and consumer confidence[Global economy ...]. US firms report direct hits to production, and retaliatory action by China, India, and the EU means trade equivalent to over 2% of world GDP now faces enhanced tariffs. The effect is compounded by the possibility of a broader trend away from "free world" values, as authoritarian powers such as China leverage state control over critical supply chains, and as countries with questionable environmental and human rights records use market access as leverage.
International Sanctions, Political Fragmentation, and the "New Multipolarity"
Overnight, diplomatic fissures deepened further as Canada, the UK, Norway, Australia, and New Zealand jointly imposed sanctions on two Israeli cabinet ministers for inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank. The US quickly condemned these sanctions and urged their withdrawal, highlighting diverging approaches among traditional allies regarding conduct in the Israel-Palestine conflict[U.S. condemns C...]. This applies additional pressure to the postwar order, signalling that coalitions are realigning over issues of accountability, human rights, and the definition of legitimate sanctions—a dynamic businesses with interests in sensitive regions or sectors ignore at their peril.
Meanwhile, ongoing economic uncertainty and border restrictions are undermining confidence in global business travel and investment flows. Positive sentiment in the global business travel sector dropped from 67% in late 2024 to just 31% in April 2025, and nearly 30% of business travel buyers anticipate fewer US-bound trips this year[Global corporat...]. This reflects a structural shift in globalisation and places new emphasis on diversifying operations and markets, especially toward regions more aligned with transparent, rules-based systems.
Value Alignment, Corporate Strategy, and the Return of Industrial Policy
The cumulative effect of these trends is a world in which international business strategy demands not just risk assessment but values-based decision-making. US tariff policy, for example, is prioritising economic nationalism over environmental and multilateral commitments—potentially undermining global climate goals at the very moment when the free and open world needs coordinated action[New Tariffs To ...]. Multinational firms looking for long-term resilience should rigorously vet their footprints, supply networks, and investment strategies for exposure to volatile, opaque, or unaligned environments. Europe and like-minded democracies continue to advocate for regulatory frameworks that encourage both ethical conduct and diversified trade; the evolving nature of US, Chinese, and illiberal state policies will test the business community’s collective response.
Conclusions
The latest moves between the US and China provide a temporary safety net for investors and global supply chains, but the threat of regressing into a full-blown trade war lingers under the surface, and the world economy’s momentum is visibly sputtering. The shifting fault lines—between protectionism and free trade, between value-driven alliances and opportunistic deals, between ethical and unaccountable governance—define the risk landscape for 2025 and beyond.
For business leaders and investors, the fundamental questions remain clear: Is your supply chain ready for the next shock? Are your markets properly hedged against adverse regulatory or political action? And as the world fragments into blocks with distinctly different values, governance standards, and risk appetites, where does your organization want to sit?
How will your company adapt as the center of gravity in trade, regulation, and values continues to shift? Will you prioritise resilience, transparency, and long-term value alignment, or chase after short-term gains in riskier, less accountable arenas? The events of June 2025 offer a sharp reminder: in today’s world, the intersection of geopolitics and geoeconomics is not an optional horizon scan, but a core leadership competency.
Further Reading:
Themes around the World:
Won Weakness And Funding Pressure
The won has traded above 1,500 per dollar, its weakest level in 17 years, lifting import costs, inflation and corporate borrowing rates. With foreign selling near 29.9 trillion won over five weeks, hedging, financing and margin management have become more critical.
Domestic Demand Remains Weak
China’s persistent property stress and subdued consumption continue to push policymakers toward export-led growth, intensifying global concerns over overcapacity and dumping. For foreign businesses, this supports lower-cost sourcing but heightens external trade friction, margin pressure, and volatility in sectors exposed to Chinese industrial surpluses.
Import Cost Pass-Through Pressures
Recent studies estimate 80% to 100% of US tariff costs were passed through into import prices, with collections reaching $264 billion to $287 billion in 2025. Importers absorb most of the burden, pressuring margins, consumer prices and capital spending.
Sanctions Volatility And Oil Flows
Iran’s oil exports have remained resilient despite sanctions and strikes, estimated around 1.6 million barrels per day in March, while temporary US licensing added further policy uncertainty. Businesses face abrupt compliance, pricing and contract risks as enforcement and exemptions shift unpredictably.
Production Bottlenecks and Storage Pressure
Export outages and refinery disruptions are clogging Russia’s pipeline system and filling storage, with industry sources warning output cuts are likely. This raises uncertainty for feedstock availability, contract fulfillment and regional energy pricing, while also affecting connected exporters such as Kazakhstan using Russian routes.
CUSMA Review and Tariff Uncertainty
Canada faces heightened trade uncertainty ahead of the July 1 CUSMA review, with U.S. officials threatening tougher bilateral terms while Section 232 tariffs persist on steel, aluminum, autos and lumber. Prolonged negotiations could freeze investment, complicate sourcing and disrupt North American production planning.
Domestic Supply And Export Controls
Damage to refineries and export terminals is pushing Moscow to consider measures such as renewed gasoline export bans to protect the domestic market. Such interventions can abruptly disrupt product availability, pricing, and fulfillment for industrial users, distributors, and regional supply chains tied to Russia.
Fiscal slippage and spending pressure
Brazil’s 2026 fiscal outlook has deteriorated sharply, with the government projecting a R$59.8 billion primary deficit before exclusions and only a R$1.6 billion spending freeze. Persistent budget strain raises sovereign-risk premiums, financing costs, and policy unpredictability for investors and operators.
US Tariff And Origin Risk
New US tariffs of 10% for 150 days, with possible escalation to 15% and broader Section 301 exposure, are raising origin-tracing and anti-circumvention risks. Exporters in garments, footwear, seafood, furniture and electronics face margin pressure, contract renegotiation and supply-chain restructuring.
Inflation Pressures Squeeze Operations
Japan returned to a February trade surplus of ¥57.3 billion, yet imports climbed 10.2%, outpacing export growth. Rising energy and input costs risk reviving cost-push inflation, challenging procurement budgets, consumer demand, and profitability planning across import-dependent business sectors.
Energy Import Exposure Intensifies
Turkey’s heavy dependence on imported oil and gas is amplifying macro and supply-chain vulnerability. The central bank estimates a permanent 10% oil-price rise adds 1.1 percentage points to inflation and worsens the annual energy balance by $3-5 billion.
Security and Water Stress Risks
Operational risk is elevated by insecurity and resource stress. The OECD estimates insecurity reduces potential growth by 1–2 percentage points annually, while worsening water scarcity and leakage losses of up to 46% threaten manufacturing continuity, site selection and logistics reliability in key industrial regions.
Labor Shortages Constrain Expansion
Ukrainian businesses continue to face labor scarcity linked to wartime mobilization, displacement, and demographic pressure. Staffing gaps raise wage costs, limit production scaling, and complicate project execution, pushing firms toward automation, retraining, relocation, and redesigned workforce strategies.
Transport Protests Threaten Logistics
French hauliers are planning blockades as fuel costs, around 30% of operating expenses, surge and government aid is seen as inadequate. Road protests raise risks of delivery delays, higher domestic freight costs, and disruption around major logistics corridors.
Inflation, Rates and Shekel Volatility
The Bank of Israel held rates at 4% as war-driven energy costs, wage pressures and supply constraints lifted inflation risks. Fuel could exceed NIS 8 per liter, while shekel volatility complicates pricing, hedging and tax planning for importers, exporters and multinationals.
Semiconductor Push Gains Scale
Vietnam is accelerating its semiconductor ambitions with over 50 chip design firms, around 7,000 engineers, US$14.2 billion in FDI across 241 projects, and its first fabrication plant underway. The opportunity is substantial, but talent shortages, weak R&D, and infrastructure gaps remain critical constraints.
Market Governance and Capital Outflows
Warnings over stock-market transparency and negative sovereign outlooks have heightened concerns about policy predictability and governance. Potential outflows, equity volatility, and tighter financial conditions could affect fundraising, valuations, and foreign investors’ willingness to expand exposure to Indonesian assets and ventures.
Monetary Tightening and Lira Stress
Turkey’s inflation remained around 31.5% in February while the policy rate stayed at 37%, with markets pricing further tightening. Lira pressure, reserve intervention, and higher funding costs are raising hedging, financing, and pricing risks for importers, exporters, and foreign investors.
Nuclear Expansion Regulatory Uncertainty
The EU opened a formal probe into French state aid for EDF’s six-reactor EPR2 program, a €72.8 billion project. Approval timing matters for long-term electricity pricing, industrial competitiveness, supply security, and investment planning for power-intensive manufacturers and data centers.
Infrastructure Concessions Execution Risk
Transmission planning was disrupted as five originally scheduled lots were removed pending TCU decisions and resolution of troubled MEZ Energia concessions. This underscores execution and regulatory risks in Brazilian infrastructure programs, affecting investors, equipment suppliers and long-term project pipelines.
China Investment Rules Recalibrated
New Delhi has eased parts of its border-country FDI regime, allowing some minority beneficial ownership up to 10% through the automatic route and a 60-day window for selected manufacturing approvals. The move could modestly improve capital access and technology transfer prospects.
Export Controls Tighten Tech Risk
Semiconductor and AI-server enforcement is intensifying after alleged diversion of roughly $2.5 billion in restricted US hardware to China. Businesses in electronics, cloud, and advanced manufacturing face higher compliance costs, tighter licensing scrutiny, intermediary risk, and potential disruption across technology supply chains.
Energy Security Investment Push
Despite price shocks, Turkey reports no immediate supply shortage, citing diversified sourcing, 71% gas storage levels, and domestic projects in Sakarya, Gabar, Somalia, and Akkuyu. These investments could improve resilience, but also redirect fiscal resources and influence industrial competitiveness over time.
Energy Export Diversification Drive
Canada is pushing new oil, gas, and LNG export routes to reduce dependence on the U.S. and serve allied markets. Proposed pipeline expansions and LNG growth could reshape export flows, but permitting delays and federal-provincial bargaining remain major constraints.
Oil Shock Hits Trade Balance
Brent’s jump above $100 a barrel has compounded India’s import burden, widened the merchandise trade deficit and increased inflation risks. Energy-intensive sectors, transport users and import-dependent manufacturers face rising operating costs, while policymakers may trim fiscal and capital spending.
US Tariff Probe Exposure
Thailand faces heightened trade risk from new US Section 301 investigations targeting alleged unfair practices and transshipment concerns. Potential new levies could disrupt electronics, autos and broader manufacturing exports, complicating sourcing decisions, compliance planning and market diversification for foreign firms.
Nusantara Capital Investment Momentum
The new capital project continues attracting private commitments, with Rp1.27 trillion in fresh deals and Rp72 trillion from 57 companies by early 2026. This creates openings in construction, logistics, property, and services, though execution timing and policy continuity remain important variables.
Inflation and Shekel Pressure
Oil above $100 a barrel, a weaker shekel and fuel-price pressures threaten to lift inflation by about one percentage point, reducing chances of near-term rate cuts and increasing hedging, financing and pricing challenges for importers and exporters.
US Trade Pact Rewrites Access
Indonesia’s new US trade pact cuts threatened tariffs from 32% to 19%, opens wider market access and eases US entry into critical minerals, energy and digital sectors. Ratification uncertainty still complicates investment planning, sourcing decisions and export pricing.
IMF Program Anchors Stability
Pakistan’s staff-level IMF deal would unlock about $1.2 billion, taking total disbursements to roughly $4.5 billion, but keeps strict fiscal, tax and reform conditions. For investors, macro stability is improving, yet policy tightening and compliance risks remain significant.
US Tariff Exposure Escalates
Thailand faces rising trade risk from US Section 301 investigations into manufacturing policies, potentially leading to new tariffs or import restrictions. This threatens electronics, steel and broader export supply chains, while complicating market access, pricing decisions and investment planning for exporters.
CUSMA Review and Tariff Risk
Canada faces elevated trade uncertainty as Washington accelerates Section 301 probes and July CUSMA review talks lag behind Mexico. Sectoral U.S. tariffs on steel, aluminum, autos, lumber and cabinetry are already disrupting investment planning, export pricing and cross-border supply chains.
Nuclear Diplomacy Remains Unsettled
Ceasefire and nuclear proposals reportedly include sanctions relief, IAEA oversight, enrichment limits, and reopening Hormuz, but negotiations remain uncertain and politically fragile. For investors, this creates binary risk between partial market reopening and renewed escalation with broader restrictions on trade and capital flows.
Tourism Investment Opening Expands
Tourism has become a major investment channel, with SAR452 billion committed and 122 million visitors in 2025. Full foreign ownership under the 2025 Investment Law, tax incentives and PPP support expand opportunities across hospitality, logistics, services and consumer-facing operations.
China Exposure Drives Supply Diversification
Weaker exports to China and broader geopolitical friction are reinforcing Japanese efforts to diversify production, sourcing and end-markets. Companies with concentrated China exposure face higher resilience spending, while alternative Asian and European corridors become more strategically important.
US-Taiwan Trade Terms Evolve
Taiwan’s trade position with the United States is improving but remains exposed to legal and policy uncertainty around Section 301 investigations and reciprocal trade arrangements. Lower US tariffs, reportedly reduced from 20% to 15%, support exporters while compliance expectations increase.