Tariff escalation and policy volatility

The administration is normalizing broad import surcharges (10% under Section 122, potentially 15%) while teeing up expanded Section 232/301 actions. This raises landed-cost uncertainty, complicates contract pricing, and accelerates friend‑shoring and relocation decisions across sectors.

LNG infrastructure constraints and permitting

Boosting gas resilience is constrained by land scarcity, environmental assessments, and local opposition; analysts cite storage tanks operating above ideal utilization and a goal to raise safety days from ~11 toward ~14. Delays can affect power reliability assumptions for new factories and parks.

US tariff reset uncertainty

US policy shifts replaced Thailand’s prior 19% reciprocal tariff with a temporary 10% Section 122 duty for 150 days from Feb 24. Authorities expect more product-by-product actions (Sections 232/301) and tighter origin checks, complicating pricing, compliance, and investment planning.

Power sector reforms and circular debt

IMF scrutiny of electricity tariffs, distribution-company losses, and circular-debt containment keeps regulatory change frequent. Tariff adjustments and fixed-charge revisions can alter industrial cost structures quickly, affect offtake agreements, and create payment-chain risk for suppliers to utilities and SOEs.

Wage dynamics reshape demand outlook

Real wages turned positive (+1.4% y/y in January) as inflation cooled (1.7%), while unions seek ~5.94% raises. Stronger household purchasing power can lift consumption but may reinforce BOJ tightening, impacting retail, services, and labor-cost strategies.

War-driven FX and rates

Regional conflict triggered heavy FX intervention (about $12B in one week) and emergency liquidity tightening; overnight rates neared 40% and repo auctions were suspended. Expect higher hedging costs, payment volatility, and tighter working-capital conditions for importers and leveraged firms.

FDI screening may partially ease

Government is reviewing Press Note 3 (FDI from bordering countries) and considering a de minimis threshold for small-ticket approvals, while keeping the regime intact. This could accelerate venture funding and JVs, but leaves heightened national-security scrutiny and deal-timing uncertainty.

Tariff volatility and legal shifts

Supreme Court curtailed emergency-tariff authority, but the administration pivoted to temporary Section 122 surcharges and signals broader use of Sections 232/301. Rapid rate and exemption changes raise pricing, contracting, and inventory risks for importers and exporters.

Remittances resilience and fragility

Remittances rose to $3.46bn in Jan 2026 (+15.4% YoY) and $23.2bn in 7MFY26 (+11.3%). However, Middle East conflict scenarios could cut inflows 10–15% (≈$3bn), pressuring the rupee, consumption and import demand forecasting.

Transnet logistics bottlenecks and reform

Transnet’s rail/port constraints, high debt (~R144bn) and locomotive shortfalls keep export corridors volatile. While PPPs and corridor upgrades (e.g., coal/iron-ore) progress, congestion, vandalism and maintenance backlogs elevate shipping delays, costs, and inventory buffers.

Sanctions expansion and enforcement

US/EU sanctions remain the primary constraint on Iran exposure, with intensified enforcement targeting entities, ships, and intermediaries supporting illicit oil sales. Companies face heightened secondary-sanctions risk, stricter due diligence on counterparties, and greater compliance burdens across trade, finance, and insurance.

Chabahar and regional corridor uncertainty

Shifting sanctions waivers and geopolitical pressure cloud investment and operations at Chabahar port and related transit corridors. Logistics planners face uncertainty over permitted cargoes, financing, and insurance, limiting Iran’s potential as a Eurasian trade bridge and raising reroute costs.

Volatile tariff regime resets

After the Supreme Court struck down IEEPA-based tariffs, the administration invoked Trade Act Section 122, imposing a 15% global import surcharge for up to 150 days (expires July 24). Exemptions and refund uncertainty amplify pricing, contracting, and inventory-planning risk.

Local content rules remain decisive

TKDN requirements continue for government procurement, with a 40% minimum (TKDN+BMP) under industry rules, despite trade‑deal debate. Multinationals in telecom, electronics, and infrastructure must localize sourcing, assembly, or partnerships to qualify for projects.

Sectoral Section 232 tariff pressure

National-security tariffs under Section 232 remain a durable lever on steel, aluminum, autos and potentially other strategic sectors. Ongoing or new investigations can raise costs, alter competitiveness, and incentivize nearshoring or US production to preserve market access.

EU reliance on Russian LNG

EU ports absorbed essentially all Yamal LNG cargoes in early 2026 even as a 2027 ban is planned. This policy-market gap increases regulatory whiplash risk, complicates long-term contracting, and heightens scrutiny of European shipping and insurance participation.

Tourism recovery amid policy tightening

Tourism remains a key demand driver but is exposed to geopolitics and immigration changes. Authorities are considering cutting visa-free stays from 60 to 30 days; long-haul travel may soften with higher airfares, while Chinese arrivals show early rebound but remain fragile.

Energia e sanções: diesel russo

O Brasil elevou importações de derivados russos para US$474,8 milhões até fevereiro, 1,5x a/a, com 36,4% de participação—maior fornecedor. Isso reduz custos no curto prazo, mas aumenta exposição a risco reputacional, compliance, e possíveis medidas secundárias.

EU market access and EPA transition

Uganda and the EU are nearing an Economic Partnership Agreement: up to 80% of EU goods could enter duty-free over time while sensitive sectors stay protected. Exporters must prepare for stricter SPS, traceability and rules-of-origin as LDC benefits evolve.

Tariff volatility and legal risk

Supreme Court curbed IEEPA tariffs, but the White House replaced them with Section 122’s 10–15% temporary global surcharge and signaled broader Section 232/301 actions. Rapid rule changes, exemptions and refund litigation raise pricing, contracting and customs-planning uncertainty.

Shadow fleet and illicit routing

Russia sustains crude exports via aging, lightly insured “shadow fleet” and complex shell-company trading networks masking origin and pricing. Enforcement actions and vessel listings raise freight, insurance and port-access risks, amplifying supply-chain opacity and reputational exposure.

Energy grid fragility and costs

Repeated attacks on generation and transmission drive outages, forcing costly generators, fuel logistics, and production interruptions. EBRD cut 2026 growth forecast to 2.5% from 5%, warning impacts persist into 2027 as repairs take time, affecting pricing and reliability.

Pakistan–Afghanistan border trade disruptions

Prolonged closures of key commercial crossings since mid-October have stranded hundreds of trucks and halted cement, food and medicines flows. Persistent security frictions raise transit-time uncertainty for regional corridors, increase inventory buffers, and redirect trade via Iran/China routes.

Nickel quota cuts reshape supply

Pemerintah memangkas kuota bijih nikel RKAB 2026 menjadi 260–270 juta ton dari 379 juta (2025), memicu potensi defisit hingga ~130 juta ton dan utilisasi smelter turun 70–75%. Risiko impor naik, biaya bahan baku meningkat, kontrak offtake tertekan.

U.S. tariff and 301 volatility

Seoul faces renewed U.S. trade-policy uncertainty after IEEPA-based reciprocal tariffs were struck down, pushing Washington toward Section 232/301 tools. Korea passed a $350bn U.S.-investment law, yet a new USTR 301 probe raises sectoral tariff risk.

Energy pricing volatility and OSPs

Saudi Aramco sharply raised April 2026 official selling prices: Arab Light +$2.50/bbl to Asia and +$3.50/bbl to Europe/Mediterranean. For energy-intensive industries and petrochemicals, this increases input-cost volatility and strengthens the case for hedging and contract flexibility.

Cross-strait conflict and blockade risk

Elevated China–Taiwan tensions keep tail-risk of air/sea disruption high, affecting Taipei/Kaohsiung throughput, insurance premiums, and just-in-time electronics supply. Firms should harden contingency routing, inventory buffers, and crisis communications, especially for semiconductor-dependent products.

Rail and logistics infrastructure targeted

Russia is increasingly striking rail nodes and west–east logistics corridors, alongside ports, to strain Ukraine’s supply spine linking EU support to industry and frontlines. Businesses should expect transport delays, higher warehousing needs, and contingency planning across multimodal routes and border crossings.

Port security and continuity planning

Israeli ports remain operational but face elevated missile/drone and cyber/electronic-interference risks during escalation. Businesses should anticipate contingency operating procedures, tighter security and screening, potential labor constraints, and episodic throughput delays affecting time-sensitive imports, defense logistics, and just-in-time manufacturing.

Middle East energy chokepoint risk

Strait of Hormuz tensions threaten Korea’s energy and input flows: roughly 70% of crude and ~20–30% of LNG originate in the Middle East. Rerouting can add 3–5 days and raise freight 50–80%, lifting manufacturing costs and FX volatility.

Security disruptions on logistics corridors

Cartel-related violence and mass roadblocks recently disrupted freight on key routes linking Manzanillo–Guadalajara–Tamaulipas and border crossings, tightening trucking capacity and delaying shipments. Elevated cargo theft (often violent) increases insurance, security spend, transit times, and inventory buffering needs.

Anti-corruption and AML tightening

A 240-page governance plan aligned with IMF diagnostics targets procurement, asset declarations and AML/CFT enforcement, including risk-based verification and potential AML Act amendments by June 2027. Stronger compliance expectations increase onboarding friction but can improve dispute resolution and transparency.

Gas supply disruptions risk

Israel’s suspension of roughly 1.1 bcfd gas exports to Egypt highlights energy-security dependence. Egypt is advancing LNG imports, chartering multiple FSRUs (~2 bcfd capacity) and planning ~75 cargoes (est. $3.75bn), raising costs for power and energy-intensive industry.

US–Japan strategic investment trade-offs

Phase-one projects in a $550bn US–Japan investment initiative include a $33bn, 9.2GW Ohio gas plant plus US export infrastructure. The package links market access and tariff mitigation to outward FDI, influencing capex planning, local-content, and political risk management.

Defense-industrial expansion and partnerships

Ukraine’s defense sector is scaling and partnering with EU/US firms, including joint ventures abroad and localized production. This creates opportunities in drones, electronics, and dual-use supply chains, while tightening export-control compliance and increasing targeting and cyber risks.

Central European Gas Transit Leverage

Germany’s first gas deliveries to Ukraine via Rügen LNG regasification routed through Poland highlight Germany’s rising role in regional energy flows. Cross-border capacity, regulatory coordination, and geopolitical shocks can directly affect industrial continuity and energy procurement in Germany.