Critical Minerals and Input Security

German industry’s exposure to Chinese-controlled critical inputs (notably rare earths) is now treated as strategic vulnerability. Firms should anticipate tighter due diligence, stockpiling, and multi-sourcing requirements, plus heightened disruption risk if trade disputes trigger export controls or delays.

Nuclear and grid export momentum

Korea is positioning nuclear and grid infrastructure as investable U.S. projects while expanding SMR cooperation abroad, exemplified by KHNP’s MOU with Singapore’s EMA. Growing AI-driven power demand supports opportunities in reactors, transmission hardware, EPC services, and financing.

Enflasyon katılığı, sıkı finansman

Şubat’ta enflasyon aylık %2,96, yıllık %31,53; gıda %6,89 artışla belirleyici. Jeopolitik enerji şoklarıyla gecelik faiz ~%40’a yükseldi; politika faizi %37’de tutulabilir. Kredi maliyeti, talep ve yatırım fizibiliteleri üzerinde baskı artar.

Green hydrogen export ecosystem emerging

NEOM’s green hydrogen project, reported as a ~$8.4bn build with 2026 operational targets, underpins Saudi ambitions in clean-energy exports. For industry, it signals future demand for renewable EPC, electrolyzers, ports and offtake contracts, alongside evolving standards, certification and procurement localization.

Fiscal rules and investment capacity

Debate over reforming Germany’s debt brake shapes the scale and timing of infrastructure, climate, and security spending. Coalition tension creates policy uncertainty for public procurement, PPP pipelines, and tax/fee trajectories—affecting investment planning, demand outlook, and funding availability.

China export curbs escalate

Beijing’s dual‑use export restrictions and watchlists targeting 40 Japanese entities (including major defense/aerospace groups) heighten compliance risk, disrupt critical‑mineral inputs, and accelerate diversification away from China in sourcing, sales, and JV planning.

Anti-corruption and AML tightening

A 240-page governance plan aligned with IMF diagnostics targets procurement, asset declarations and AML/CFT enforcement, including risk-based verification and potential AML Act amendments by June 2027. Stronger compliance expectations increase onboarding friction but can improve dispute resolution and transparency.

Shipbuilding and LNG Carrier Upscycle

Chinese LNG carrier orders are filling delivery slots and indirectly strengthening Korean shipbuilders’ pricing power for high-value vessels. With U.S. LNG projects expanding, ton-mile demand could lift 2026–2030 orderbooks, benefiting yards and maritime supply chains, but requiring capacity discipline.

Sticky inflation and higher rates

Inflation remains above the RBA’s 2–3% target, with headline CPI around 3.8% and core near 3.4%, lifting expectations of further tightening. Higher funding costs and AUD volatility affect project finance, consumer demand, real estate, and M&A valuation assumptions.

Critical minerals export licensing

China is expanding and enforcing export controls on dual-use and strategic materials, including rare-earth-related items and metals like gallium/germanium. New restrictions (including toward Japan) increase procurement uncertainty, lead times, and price volatility for electronics, aerospace, defense-adjacent, and clean-tech supply chains.

Anti-corruption drive and enforcement risk

A renewed, high-level anti-corruption push is framed as a long-term campaign with stricter oversight of sensitive areas. For foreign firms, this can improve governance over time, but near-term raises decision delays, heightened audits, and greater due‑diligence needs for partners and permits.

USMCA review and North America rules

A 2026 USMCA review is positioned as conditional, with U.S. pressure on Mexico/Canada over dairy access, energy, labor enforcement, and origin rules. Outcomes could shift regional sourcing strategies, automotive and agri-food flows, and investment decisions tied to tariff-free access.

Sanctions expansion and compliance burden

Ukraine is tightening sanctions against Russia-linked defense, finance, crypto, and “shadow fleet” actors, including 225 captains and dozens of entities. Multinationals face heightened due-diligence, counterparty screening, and shipping-chain transparency requirements to avoid secondary exposure and reputational risk.

Currency instability and import controls

High inflation and rial depreciation increase input-cost volatility and drive periodic import restrictions, multiple exchange rates, and ad hoc licensing. Multinationals face pricing challenges, payment delays, inventory buffering needs, and higher working-capital requirements for Iran-linked supply chains.

Middle East shipping disrupts inputs

Escalating Gulf/Strait of Hormuz disruption threatens sulphur supplies; Indonesia imports ~75% from the Middle East for HPAL sulphuric acid. Stockpiles reportedly cover 1–2 months; prices near $500/ton rose 10–15%, risking near-term production curtailments and contract disruptions.

Tariff volatility and legal risk

Supreme Court struck down IEEPA-based tariffs, prompting a temporary 10–15% global import surcharge under Section 122 (150-day limit) and accelerated Section 301 probes. Importers face duty volatility, contract renegotiations, and unresolved refund litigation exposure.

Cybersecurity regulation and threat intensity

Ransomware attacks rose sharply in 2025 and new UK cyber resilience legislation, alongside EU-adjacent regimes like NIS2 and DORA, raises compliance expectations. Mid-market firms face higher reporting and control requirements, driving investment in unified security platforms and vendor due diligence.

US–China tariff volatility returns

US court-driven tariff reshuffles and temporary Section 122 surcharges create unstable landed costs for China-linked trade. Firms face recurring renegotiations, shipment front-loading, and sudden retaliation risk, complicating contracting, pricing, and inventory planning across transpacific supply chains.

Energy security and shipping demand

Middle East escalation and potential Hormuz disruption are lifting LNG demand and boosting LNG carrier and FLNG orders for Korean shipbuilders. At the same time, energy-price spikes raise import costs and inflation risk, affecting manufacturing competitiveness and transport insurance and freight rates.

China De-risking and Reciprocity

Berlin is recalibrating China ties toward “de-risking” rather than decoupling, amid a €89bn bilateral trade deficit and sharp export declines (autos to China down ~33% in 2025). Expect tougher reciprocity demands, higher compliance costs, and supply diversification.

Russia trade rerouting and border friction

Trade increasingly reroutes via China, the Far East, Belarus and Central Asia as checks tighten. Border-crossing times for China–Kazakhstan–Russia routes have tripled at times, with delays up to a month and transport costs up 5–10%, straining inventory planning and service levels.

State asset seizures and nationalization

Russia continues using courts and decrees to reassign assets linked to “unfriendly” jurisdictions, illustrated by the Domodedovo airport takeover. Foreign investors face heightened expropriation, governance and exit risks, including blocked divestments, forced discounts, and constrained dividend repatriation.

Manufacturing overcapacity and petrochemicals pressure

The USTR’s “structural excess capacity” focus spotlights Korea’s large bilateral surplus with the U.S. (cited at $56bn in 2024) and acknowledged petrochemicals capacity issues. This increases antidumping/301 risk and could accelerate consolidation, export diversion, and margin compression.

USMCA review and tariff risk

Bilateral Mexico–U.S. talks start March 16 ahead of the 2026 USMCA review, with Washington pushing tighter rules of origin, anti-transshipment measures and supply-chain security. Remaining tariffs (e.g., 50% metals; 17% tomatoes) raise planning uncertainty.

Tech controls and chip chokepoints

Semiconductor policy is increasingly inconsistent yet restrictive: case-by-case licensing, new tariffs, and tighter oversight proposals raise compliance burden. China-facing fabs and tool shipments remain entangled, elevating disruption risk for electronics, autos, and industrials reliant on China-based production.

Reconstruction boom amid war risk

Rebuilding needs are estimated at $587.7B for 2026–2035, with direct damage $195.1B and priority 2026 needs $15.25B. Large pipelines in transport, energy, housing create opportunities, but contracting, security, and performance-risk management remain decisive for investors.

Global backlash to China overcapacity

China’s large trade surplus and capacity expansion in EVs and other advanced manufacturing are triggering investigations and trade defenses abroad. Expect more anti-dumping actions, local-content rules, and subsidy probes, complicating export-led strategies and outbound investment siting decisions.

Black Sea export corridor volatility

Ukraine’s maritime corridor via Odesa remains operational but vulnerable to repeated attacks on ports and commercial vessels. Since 2022, 694 port facilities and 150+ civilian ships were damaged. Security-driven cost spikes and volume swings disrupt grain, metals, and containerized trade flows.

Regional security and operating risk

Escalation around Iran, Red Sea threats, and aviation disruptions increase travel, insurance, and duty-of-care costs. While Egypt is not a direct belligerent, heightened regional risk can disrupt tourism, staffing mobility, and project timelines, especially in coastal logistics hubs.

EU–Australia FTA endgame

EU–Australia FTA talks are in a decisive phase, with remaining gaps on beef/lamb quotas and regulatory conditions; compromises on geographical indications and Australia’s luxury car tax are in play. A deal could reshape tariffs, compliance, and mobility for firms.

Foreign investment screening tightening

Australia’s FIRB and competition settings are becoming more complex, with longer timelines and higher process risk for minority stakes and sensitive sectors. This raises transaction costs for cross-border M&A and infrastructure deals and elevates the value of early regulatory strategy and deal structuring.

Domestic politics affecting economic policy

Opposition-led legislative initiatives, including limits on exporting advanced chip know-how, and scrutiny of the ART ratification process can delay policy execution. Businesses should monitor parliamentary timelines, consultation requirements, and potential rule changes affecting investment approvals and market access.

China export curbs on Japan

Beijing imposed dual-use export bans on 20 Japanese entities and tightened licensing for 20 more, with extraterritorial restrictions on China-origin items. This raises compliance, sourcing, and contract-friction risks across aerospace, machinery, autos, and electronics supply chains.

USMCA review and tariff risks

The 2026 USMCA/CUSMA review is raising tariff and rules-of-origin uncertainty, with U.S. officials signaling higher baseline tariffs and stricter content rules. This volatility is delaying investment decisions, reshaping North American sourcing, and increasing compliance and pricing complexity.

Critical minerals export weaponization

China’s export controls on gallium, germanium and rare earths remain a high-impact lever. With China producing ~99% of primary gallium and supplying ~95% of US imports, shipment disruptions and price spikes (e.g., yttrium +60%) threaten aerospace, semiconductors and EV supply chains.

US–Indonesia trade deal resets rules

A new Agreement on Reciprocal Trade sets 19% US tariffs on Indonesian goods while Indonesia commits to easing non‑tariff barriers, including limits on import licensing and SPS rules. Compliance and sector exemptions reshape market access and pricing strategies.