Mission Grey Daily Brief - December 20, 2024

Summary of the Global Situation for Businesses and Investors

The world is witnessing a landscape dominated by conflicts and wars, exacerbated by the rise of economic and trade protectionism and the prevalence of double standards. Russia and North Korea continue to engage in military action in Ukraine, while Israel and Yemen are trading attacks in the war on Gaza. Georgia is experiencing unprecedented government violence in response to mass protests, and Egypt, Türkiye, and Iran are addressing regional issues at the D-8 summit in Cairo. Meanwhile, India has successfully resisted China's salami-slicing strategy, and Turkey and Qatar are emerging as brokers and kingmakers in Syria, filling the void left by the collapse of Iranian influence.

Russia's Military Action in Ukraine

Russia's military action in Ukraine continues to escalate, with President Vladimir Putin expressing readiness to compromise with President-elect Donald Trump on ending the war and no conditions for beginning talks with Kyiv. However, Putin maintains that Russia is advancing toward its main goals in Ukraine and rules out making any major territorial concessions. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy pushes European countries to provide guarantees to protect Ukraine after the war concludes, emphasising the need for support from the United States under Trump.

The conflict has resulted in casualties on both sides, with Russian missile attacks killing and wounding civilians in Ukraine's northeastern Kharkiv region and southeastern city of Kryvyi Rih. Ukraine has also launched missiles at Russia's Rostov region, leading to a fire at an oil refinery.

Israel-Yemen Conflict

The conflict between Israel and Yemen has escalated, with the US imposing new sanctions targeting the Houthis as the Yemeni group continues to trade attacks with Israel amid the war on Gaza. The US Department of the Treasury announced penalties on Thursday on Hashem al-Madani, the governor of the central bank in Houthi-controlled Sanaa, and several Houthi officials and associated companies, accusing them of helping the group acquire “dual-use and weapons components”. The US Treasury described al-Madani as the “primary overseer of funds sent to the Houthis” by the Quds Force of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

Yemen has two competing central banks, one in the Houthi-controlled capital Sanaa that serves areas of the country controlled by the rebel group, and another in Aden for the areas of the country controlled by the internationally recognised government and other anti-Houthi groups. The US sanctions came hours after Israel bombed targets in Yemen, including power stations near Sanaa, killing at least nine people.

Unrest in Georgia

In response to mass protests, the ruling Georgian Dream party has unleashed unprecedented violence against thousands of demonstrators, with more than 400 people detained and many subjected to brutal treatment by police and law enforcement. The developments reflect a broader geopolitical trend as great power competition intensifies and America’s adversaries seek to weaken its alliances and turn traditional Western partners against it.

As the incoming Trump administration prepares to tackle a range of foreign policy priorities, the crisis in Georgia demands significant attention. The risk is that the moment will not be recognized, and the opportunity lost. Having reached the zenith of its global influence after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the US has seen a decline in its standing over the past two decades as China rises and forms an alliance of growing significance with Russia and other disgruntled authoritarian states.

The incoming administration can alter this dynamic by defending its strategic interests and acting decisively to support its partners. Helping Georgia remain in the pro-Western camp could be a relatively easy victory — one that would send a strong message about Washington’s resolve and strengthen its position in the region and beyond.

Turkey and Qatar's Role in Syria

With Iran on the decline, a new axis is rising in the Middle East, and Syria is still key. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan and Qatar are emerging as brokers and kingmakers in Syria, filling the void left by the collapse of Iranian influence in the pivotal country. Their sudden emergence raises the prospect of a realignment of the Arab Middle East.

For years, Turkey and Qatar backed what had been written off as the losing side in Syria’s civil war. With the Assad regime’s fall, and as Iran’s influence wanes, they are geopolitical winners. The Mideast’s axis of power is shifting, but it still runs through Syria.

While they have their own ambitious interests to pursue, both see an opportunity to use Syria to revive a common regional agenda: support for popular democratic movements and Islamist political parties. Since the fall of Bashar al-Assad, Turkey and Qatar have been the most active foreign governments in Syria. Turkish intelligence chief İbrahim Kalın was in Damascus Friday; a Qatari government delegation visited the capital Sunday and reopened its embassy Tuesday.

At a gathering in Doha last week with the foreign ministers of Iran and Russia, the main outside backers of the crumbled Assad regime, the Turkish and Qatari foreign ministers worked behind the scenes to ensure a bloodless transition of power. In Doha and later in a meeting in Aqaba, Jordan, it was Turkey and Qatar that Arab states, the United States, the European Union, and the United Nations relied on to reach out to the interim Syrian government.

They were well positioned. Only weeks before, as Arab states were moving to normalize ties with Syria and calls were growing in Washington to lift sanctions on the Assad regime, Turkey and Qatar were the last two countries supporting the Syrian opposition. Qatar was the only nation that recognized the opposition as the legitimate Syrian government.

Themes around the World:

Border and nationalism-related disruptions

Nationalist politics linked to the Cambodia dispute is influencing border policy, including proposals for walls and checkpoint closures. Any tightening can disrupt cross-border trade, trucking, and regional supply chains, while elevating security, insurance, and compliance requirements for logistics operators.

LNG export expansion and permitting

The administration is accelerating LNG export approvals and permitting, supporting long-term contracts with Europe and Asia and stimulating upstream investment. Cheaper, abundant U.S. gas can lower energy-input costs for U.S. manufacturing while tightening global gas markets and shipping capacity.

Défense: hausse des dépenses 2026

Le budget 2026 prévoit 57,2 Md€ pour les armées (+13%) et une actualisation de la LPM attendue au printemps. Opportunités: marchés défense, cybersécurité, drones; contraintes: conformité export, priorités industrielles, tensions sur capacités et main-d’œuvre.

Reconstruction and infrastructure pipeline

Ongoing post-earthquake rebuilding and associated infrastructure upgrades continue to generate procurement and contracting opportunities across construction materials, logistics, and utilities. However, project execution risk remains tied to municipal permitting, cost inflation, and financing conditions under tight policy.

Port expansion and logistics scaling

Vietnam is investing heavily to become a regional logistics hub. Seaport system investment needs are estimated at VND 359.5 trillion (US$13.8bn) by 2030, while Hai Phong and Cat Lai report strong TEU growth, reducing lead-time risk but stressing hinterland links.

Oil export revenues weakening sharply

January oil-and-gas tax receipts fell to 393bn rubles ($5.1bn) from 587bn in December and 1.12tr in Jan 2025. Wider Urals discounts and disrupted India flows compress margins, increasing fiscal pressure and policy unpredictability for businesses operating in Russia.

Macro volatility and funding constraints

Infrastructure rebuild needs collide with fiscal and SOE balance-sheet limits. Eskom debt and unbundling design shape financing costs, while municipalities’ weak finances constrain service delivery. For investors, this elevates FX, interest-rate and payment-risk premiums, and lengthens due diligence on counterparties.

Strategic port and infrastructure security

Debate over the China-leased Darwin Port underscores rising security-driven intervention risk in infrastructure. Logistics operators and investors should model contract renegotiation/compensation scenarios, enhanced screening, and potential operational constraints near defence facilities and northern bases.

Energy exports and infrastructure constraints

Canada remains a major energy supplier, yet pipeline, LNG, and power-transmission buildout is politically and regulatory complex. This affects long-term contracts and project timelines. Buyers and investors should diversify routes, build flexibility into contracts, and model permitting delays.

Security overhaul and investment screening

Tokyo is revising core security documents and proposing a Japan-style CFIUS to screen foreign investment in sensitive sectors, review foreign land purchases, and harden critical supply chains. Expect tighter FDI approvals, compliance burdens, and greater scrutiny of China-linked ownership and technology transfers.

Border logistics and bridge uncertainty

U.S. threats to delay the Gordie Howe Detroit–Windsor bridge—despite its strategic role in a corridor handling about $126B in truck trade value—add operational risk. Firms should plan for border congestion, routing redundancy, and potential policy-linked disruptions at ports of entry.

ديناميكيات غزة ومعبر رفح

إعادة فتح معبر رفح بشكل محدود وتحت ترتيبات تفتيش ومراقبة مع حصص يومية للحركة يؤثر في تدفقات المساعدات والعمالة واللوجستيات إلى شمال سيناء. أي تصعيد أو تشديد قيود يرفع مخاطر التشغيل للشركات قرب الحدود ويؤخر الإمدادات والمشاريع.

Digital regulation and data liability

Korea is tightening rules affecting global tech firms: platform “fairness” initiatives, network-usage fee disputes, mapping-data controls, and tougher Personal Information Protection Act amendments that shift breach liability onto companies. Multinationals face higher compliance, litigation, and operational-risk exposure.

Sanctions escalation and secondary pressure

The U.S. continues expanding and enforcing sanctions—especially targeting Russia- and Iran-linked networks and “shadow fleets”—raising secondary-sanctions exposure for non‑U.S. firms. Banks, shippers, insurers, and traders face higher due‑diligence burdens, payment disruptions, and contract frustration risk.

Tariff regime reset, ongoing uncertainty

Supreme Court invalidated broad IEEPA-based ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs, but the White House is implementing a time-limited Section 122 global tariff (10–15% for 150 days) and signaling new Section 301/232 actions. Import pricing, contracts, and compliance remain volatile.

Clean-energy localization requirements

Industrial policy and tax credits increasingly favor North American and allied-country content, tightening rules on “foreign” supply chains. Firms in batteries, EVs, solar, and critical minerals must document provenance, redesign sourcing, and manage credit eligibility risk in project economics.

Labor regulation and strike liability

The “Yellow Envelope” law taking effect March 10 broadens “employer” to include subcontractors and limits damages claims against strikers. Foreign chambers warn reduced predictability and higher labor-dispute exposure, especially for manufacturers and logistics operators using layered contracting models.

Climate shocks and supply disruptions

Monsoon floods and climate volatility continue to disrupt agriculture, transport and industrial operations; 2025 flooding displaced millions and raised ongoing exposure. Climate-resilience financing under RSF also shapes infrastructure standards, insurance costs, and due-diligence requirements for long-lived assets.

Fiscal deadlock and tax volatility

France’s 2026 budget passed via Article 49.3 after ~25,000 amendments, with a projected 5.4% GDP deficit. Corporate surtaxes and production-tax uncertainty raise planning risk for multinationals, affecting pricing, capex timing, and location decisions amid 2027 election volatility.

Water scarcity and treaty pressures

Historic drought and Mexico–U.S. water treaty obligations are becoming operational risks, particularly for water-intensive industries in northern hubs. Potential rationing, higher tariffs, and community pushback can disrupt production, requiring water audits, recycling investment, and site selection adjustments.

Sanctions and export-control compliance

Canada’s alignment with allied sanctions—especially on Russia-related trade and finance—raises compliance burden across shipping, commodities, and dual-use goods. Businesses need robust screening, beneficial-ownership checks, and controls on re-exports via third countries to avoid enforcement exposure.

Red Sea routing volatility persists

Carrier reversals on Suez/Red Sea transits underscore persistent maritime insecurity and schedule unreliability. For U.S. importers and exporters, this implies longer lead times, higher inventory buffers, potential demurrage/warehousing costs, and fluctuating ocean capacity and rates.

Defense buildup and dual-use compliance

Faster defense spending toward ~2% of GDP and deeper aerospace/space programs increase procurement opportunities but tighten export-control, ITAR-style and dual-use compliance across primes and suppliers, especially those with China-linked inputs or sales.

Macro volatility: shekel and rates

Inflation has eased to around 1.8–2.0%, reopening prospects for Bank of Israel rate cuts, but geopolitical headlines drive sharp shekel swings. This complicates pricing, hedging, and capital planning for exporters/importers, and can change local financing conditions quickly.

Tech export controls enforcement surge

Washington is tightening and actively enforcing semiconductor and AI-related export controls, illustrated by a $252m settlement over alleged post-Entity-List tool exports to China’s SMIC. Multinationals face higher compliance costs, licensing delays, and heightened penalties for third‑party diversion.

Supply-chain exposure to sectoral probes

Even as some broad tariffs were struck down, U.S. Section 232 investigations into additional sectors (e.g., aircraft, critical minerals, pharmaceuticals) keep Canadian exporters at risk. Companies should scenario-plan for sudden duty changes, certification requirements and localization pressures.

Policy execution and compliance environment

India continues “trust-based” tax and customs process reforms, including integrated systems and reduced litigation measures, while maintaining tighter enforcement in strategic sectors. Multinationals should expect improved digitalized compliance but uneven on-ground implementation across states and agencies.

Mortgage stress and domestic demand

CMHC flags rising mortgage stress in Toronto and Vancouver; over 1.5M households have renewed at higher rates and another ~1M face renewal soon. A consumer slowdown could weaken retail, construction, and SME credit demand, while increasing counterparty and portfolio risk.

T-MEC revisión y riesgo salida

La revisión obligatoria del T‑MEC antes del 1 de julio elevó la incertidumbre: Trump evalúa retirarse y EE.UU. exige cambios en reglas de origen, minerales críticos y antidumping. El riesgo de aranceles alteraría planes de inversión, precios y cadenas norteamericanas.

EU partnership and stricter standards

Vietnam–EU relations upgraded to a Comprehensive Strategic Partnership, reinforcing EVFTA-driven diversification and investment. However, access increasingly hinges on ESG, traceability, governance and carbon-related requirements (including CBAM-linked expectations), raising compliance burdens across manufacturing and agriculture exports.

Power grid and CFE investment gap

Electricity availability and interconnection delays increasingly constrain industrial expansions. Reports of reduced CFE investment and grid stress elevate outage and curtailment risk, pushing firms toward onsite generation, energy-efficiency capex, and more complex PPAs and permitting.

Pemex: deuda, rescate y pagos

Pemex mantiene alta carga financiera: Moody’s prevé pérdidas operativas promedio de US$7.000 millones en 2026‑27 y dependencia de apoyo público. Su deuda ronda US$84.500 millones y presiona déficit/soberano, impactando riesgo país, proveedores y pagos en proyectos energéticos.

EV supply-chain localization rules

Proposed “100% US-made” requirements for federally funded EV chargers would effectively stall parts of the build-out, given reliance on imported power modules and electronics. This raises uncertainty for EV infrastructure investors, equipment suppliers, and downstream fleet electrification plans.

US tariff and NTB squeeze

Washington is threatening to restore 25% tariffs unless Seoul accelerates its trade-investment bill and removes “non‑tariff barriers” spanning digital platform rules, agriculture quarantine, mapping-data transfers, and auto/pharma certification—raising compliance costs and market-access uncertainty for exporters.

Sanctions compliance and re-export controls

Reuters reporting highlights ongoing “parallel” trade routes to Russia via China, prompting Korea to crack down on indirect exports, including used vehicles. Companies face elevated screening expectations, documentation burdens, and reputational risk if products are diverted to sanctioned end users.

Tariff activism and reciprocity rates

Tariffs are being used as a standing policy lever—e.g., a reciprocal 18% rate applied to Indian-origin goods under executive authority—raising import costs, increasing pricing volatility, and incentivizing firms to re-route sourcing, renegotiate contracts, and localize production.