Mission Grey Daily Brief - November 18, 2024
Summary of the Global Situation for Businesses and Investors
The G20 summit in Brazil is overshadowed by two major wars and Donald Trump's recent election victory. Heightened global tensions and uncertainty about an incoming Trump administration have tempered any expectations for a strongly worded statement addressing the conflicts in the Middle East and between Russia and Ukraine. Experts instead anticipate a final document focused on social issues like the eradication of hunger — one of Brazil's priorities — even if it aims to include at least a mention of the ongoing wars.
Typhoons in the Philippines have caused tidal surges and displaced massive numbers of people.
Geopolitical tensions simmer as Cop29 heads into its second week in Baku, Azerbaijan. Climate advocates are urging world leaders to commit to a strong finance deal.
Japan and Ukraine have signed a security info-sharing pact to boost cooperation.
Russia-Ukraine War
The Russia-Ukraine war has dragged past its thousandth day, with hundreds of missiles and drones streaking across Kyiv's skies, killing at least two people, leaving a dozen more injured, and damaging the country's already beleaguered energy grid. Russia's relentless aerial bombardment has destroyed half of Ukraine's energy production capacity, according to President Volodymyr Zelensky.
With the harsh Ukrainian winter fast approaching, the country is already suffering from major energy shortfalls, while its outmanned and outgunned forces have been steadily ceding ground to the Kremlin's troops for weeks. Kyiv has implored its Western allies for help to rebuild its energy grid — a hugely expensive undertaking — and to supply its outgunned forces with more aerial defence weapons.
Many in Ukraine fear that Western help will not be as freely given following the imminent return of Trump to the White House in January. The Republican president-elect has frequently questioned the United States' backing for Ukraine, and campaigned with the promise of cutting a quick deal to end the war.
Joe Biden has authorised Ukraine’s use of long-range missiles to strike hundreds of miles inside Russia for the first time, according to reports. The decision marks a major policy shift and comes after Russia warned that Moscow would see the move to allow the use of US-made missiles as an “escalation.” With Biden leaving office in two months, president-elect Donald Trump has indicated he will limit American support for Ukraine and pledged to end the war quickly once he takes office in January.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has campaigned for months to allow Ukraine’s military to use US weapons to hit Russian military targets far from its border, and retains important allies in both parties in Congress. He said Sunday evening that the strikes, if carried out, would "speak for themselves." But he did not confirm the authorization directly.
The Kremlin has said that if the United States allowed Ukraine to use US-made weapons to strike far into Russia, it would lead to a rise in tension and deepen the involvement of the United States in the conflict.
North Korea's Involvement in the Russia-Ukraine War
North Korea may end up sending Putin 100,000 troops for his war, according to people familiar with assessments made by some Group of 20 nations. The analysis is one of several on the evolving partnership between Russian President Vladimir Putin and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, said the people, speaking on condition of anonymity to talk about private discussions. They stressed that such a move wasn’t imminent and that military support at that scale — if it occurred — would likely happen in batches with troops rotating over time rather than in a single deployment.
Ukraine’s ambassador to South Korea made a similar assessment earlier this month. Dmytro Ponomarenko said in an interview with VOA that Kyiv expected up to 15,000 North Korean troops deployed to fight in Russia’s Kursk region – and possibly in occupied areas of eastern Ukraine – to rotate every few months.
Kim’s decision to send North Korean troops to join Russia’s fight against Ukraine has alarmed Kyiv’s allies, who’ve warned that it risks exacerbating what is already Europe’s largest conflict since World War II. They believe the deepening cooperation between Putin and Kim could also impact the security balance in the Indo-Pacific region, where there’s mounting rivalry between China and the US.
The issue will be raised by several allies at the G-20 Summit in Brazil this week including by German Chancellor Olaf Scholz when he meets Chinese President Xi Jinping, Bloomberg previously reported. Scholz told Putin Friday in a rare phone call that the deployment of North Korean troops was a “grave escalation” of the war against Ukraine.
Scholz will press the Chinese leader at their meeting in Rio on Tuesday to use his influence over Russia and North Korea to avoid further escalation in the war, according to German officials.
The North Korean deployment shows the war is becoming globalized and Scholz and Xi will need to discuss this new dimension of the conflict, the officials said.
Worries were also raised by allies at the APEC gathering in Lima, Peru, this past week, another person said.
Xi has been the biggest benefactor to Putin and Kim in recent years, and sees both leaders as partners in pushing against the US-led world order. But his government has remained silent publicly on the dispatch of North Korean troops to Russia — a sign the Chinese president may be unhappy with the arrangement.
The Kim-Putin partnership risks adding economic pressure on China, just as Xi is bracing for potential disruption from tariffs threatened by US President-elect Donald Trump when he returns to the White House. It also undermines Beijing’s argument that the US shouldn’t have military alliances in the Indo-Pacific region.
China doesn’t “allow conflict and turmoil to happen on the Korean Peninsula” and it won’t “sit idly by when its strategic security and core interests are under threat,” Xi told US President Joe Biden at talks Saturday on the sidelines of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in Lima.
North Korea has so far sent more than 10,000 troops to fight alongside Putin’s army in Russia’s Kursk region, where Ukrainian forces have occupied part of the border territory since a surprise incursion in August. In return, Russia is providing money and helping North Korea increase its capabilities.
South Korea has said there’s a “high chance” that North Korea will seek cutting-edge technology transfers from Russia — including technology related to tactical nuclear weapons, intercontinental ballistic missiles, reconnaissance satellites and ballistic missile submarines.
As well as manpower, North Korea has also sent millions of rounds of artillery ammunition and other weapons to Russia. The Financial Times reported this week, citing Ukrainian intelligence, that Pyongyang has supplied long-range rocket and artillery systems to Russia.
US-China Relations
China’s leader Xi Jinping met for the last time with President Biden on Saturday, but was already looking ahead to President-elect Donald Trump and his "America first" policies, saying Beijing "is ready to work with a new U.S. administration."
During their talks on the sidelines of the annual Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in Peru, Xi cautioned that a stable China-U.S. relationship was critical not only to the two nations but to the "future and destiny of humanity."
Without mentioning Trump’s name, Xi appeared to signal his concern that the incoming president’s protectionist rhetoric on the campaign trail could send the U.S.-China relationship into another valley.
"China is ready to work with a new U.S. administration to maintain communication, expand cooperation and manage differences so as to strive for a steady transition of the China-U.S. relationship for the benefit of the two peoples," Xi said through an interpreter.
Xi, who is firmly entrenched atop China’s political hierarchy, spoke forcefully in his brief remarks before reporters. Biden, who is winding down more than 50 years of public service, talked in broader brushstrokes about where the relationship between the two countries has gone.
He reflected not just on the past four years but on the decades the two have known each other.
"We haven’t always agreed, but our conversations have always been candid and always been frank. We’ve never kidded one another," Biden said. "These conversations prevent miscalculations, and they ensure the competition between our two countries will not veer into conflict."
Biden urged Xi to dissuade North Korea from further deepening its support for Russia’s war on Ukraine. The leaders, with top aides surrounding them, gathered around a long rectangle of tables in an expansive conference room at a Lima hotel.
They had much to discuss, including China’s indirect support for Russia, human rights issues, technology and Taiwan, the self-ruled democracy that Beijing claims as its own. On artificial intelligence, the two agreed on the need to maintain human control over the decision to use nuclear weapons and more broadly improve safety and international cooperation of the rapidly expanding technology.
There’s much uncertainty about what lies ahead in the U.S.-China relationship under Trump, who campaigned promising to levy 60% tariffs on Chinese imports.
Already, many American companies, including Nike and eyewear retailer Warby Parker, have been diversifying their sourcing away from China. Shoe brand Steve Madden says it plans to cut imports from China by as much as 45% next year.
In a congratulatory message to Trump after his victory over Vice President Kamala Harris, Xi called for the U.S. and China to manage their differences and get along in a new era. In front of cameras Saturday, Xi spoke to Biden — but it was unmistakable that his message was directed at Trump.
"In a major flourishing sci-tech revolution, neither decoupling nor supply chain disruption is a solution," Xi said. "Only mutual, beneficial cooperation can lead to common development. ‘Small yard, high fence’ is not what a major country should pursue."
Biden administration officials have said they would advise the Trump team that managing the intense competition with Beijing will likely be the most significant foreign policy challenge they will face.
On Saturday, White House national security adviser Jake Sullivan said Biden had reinforced to Xi "that these next two months are a time of transition" and that the president would like to pass off the U.S.-China relationship "in stable terms" to the new administration.
Biden has viewed his relationship with Xi as among the most consequential on the international stage and put much effort into cultivating it.
Trump's "America First" Policy
Trump's "America First" policy could shift the Horn of Africa policy and shake up Mideast diplomacy on Iran.
Trump's recent election victory and the imminent return of an America First doctrine may also hamper the diplomatic spirit needed for broad agreement on divisive issues at the G20 summit in Brazil.<co: 11>G20 summit in Brazil.</
Further Reading:
BREAKING NEWS: Japan, Ukraine sign security info-sharing pact to boost cooperation - Kyodo News Plus
Biden approves Ukraine’s use of long-range missiles inside Russia for first time - The Independent
FirstFT: Biden authorises Ukraine to strike Russia with long-range US missiles - Financial Times
Geopolitical tensions simmer as Cop29 heads into second week - The National
North Korea may end up sending Putin 100,000 troops for his war - Fortune
North Korea ‘supplying Russia’ with long-range rocket and artillery systems - Financial Times
Russia launches massive drone, missile attack targeting Ukraine’s power grid - FRANCE 24 English
Trump already shaking up Mideast diplomacy on Iran - Al-Monitor
Themes around the World:
IMF Reforms Anchor Stability
Egypt’s seventh IMF review is advancing toward a possible $1.6 billion disbursement, reinforcing exchange-rate flexibility, fiscal discipline, privatization, and reduced state economic dominance. For investors, reform continuity improves policy visibility, but also implies tight financing conditions and ongoing adjustment risks.
Tariff Refund Litigation Uncertainty
Ongoing litigation over IEEPA tariff refunds involves roughly $166 billion and leaves importers uncertain over which entries qualify for repayment. Businesses with historic U.S. imports must reassess protest deadlines, legal strategy, cash-flow assumptions and contingent balance-sheet exposures.
Trade Negotiations Reshape Market Access
Indonesia is advancing multiple trade tracks, including 18 prospective U.S. tariff exclusions, IEU-CEPA discussions, CPTPP and OECD accession, and the EAEU free trade pact covering over 98% of Indonesia-Russia trade, reshaping tariff exposure and export planning.
Semiconductor Controls and Tech Decoupling
US export controls on advanced chips are tightening further, including restrictions on sales to Chinese-owned firms abroad, while China maintains pressure through regulatory probes and domestic substitution. Technology, AI, electronics and advanced manufacturing investors face widening compliance burdens and market access uncertainty.
Security Spillover Into Trade
Trade negotiations are increasingly tied to security, cartel violence, fentanyl enforcement, corruption allegations, and migration. This broadening agenda raises sovereign and operational risk for investors, especially in logistics-intensive sectors, while increasing uncertainty around border flows, compliance, and bilateral decision-making.
Forced-Labor Compliance Becomes Strategic
Proposed US tariffs tied to foreign forced-labor enforcement make labor-rights due diligence a direct trade issue rather than a reputational one. Importers must strengthen traceability, supplier verification, and exposure mapping, especially where inputs may involve China-linked or other high-risk production networks.
Carbon Policy and Industrial Competitiveness
Federal review of industrial carbon pricing is creating uncertainty for manufacturers, energy producers and capital-intensive investors. Ottawa is weighing adjustments while provinces dispute competitive impacts, making emissions costs, project economics, and location decisions more difficult across Canadian industrial sectors.
Europe-China Trade Conflict Escalation
The EU is moving toward tougher tools against Chinese overcapacity, with wider safeguards, possible supplier-diversification mandates and additional tariffs or quotas. Chemicals, machinery, EVs and clean-tech sectors face growing disruption risk as Brussels and Beijing prepare retaliatory trade measures.
Middle Corridor logistics push
Ankara is accelerating the Middle Corridor with Azerbaijan and Georgia, highlighting the Baku-Tbilisi-Kars railway and broader transit integration. For manufacturers and traders, this strengthens Turkey’s role as a Europe-Asia logistics node and potential supply-chain diversification platform.
Trade Diversification Beyond United States
In response to U.S. trade risk, Canada is pursuing agreements with India, ASEAN, Mercosur, Thailand and the Philippines, targeting over $300 billion in new non-U.S. exports this decade. This creates openings in logistics, energy and advanced manufacturing, while requiring firms to adapt market-entry strategies.
JETP Funding Implementation Gap
Indonesia’s Just Energy Transition Partnership totals $21.4 billion, yet only about $3.1 billion had reportedly been formally approved for disbursement by May 2026. The slow conversion of commitments into projects delays renewable deployment, grid upgrades, and industrial decarbonization opportunities for foreign investors.
Sanctions And Blockade Escalation
US pressure on Iran’s oil and petrochemical trade is intensifying through maritime interdictions, secondary sanctions, and blacklisting of vessels, brokers, and front companies across Hong Kong, Singapore, Qatar, UAE, and elsewhere, sharply complicating payments, shipping, and third-country compliance exposure.
China Critical Minerals Pressure
China has largely halted some heavy rare earth and gallium exports to Japan since December, affecting magnets, semiconductors, autos, and defense-linked manufacturing. The episode highlights Japan’s vulnerability to economic coercion and accelerates diversification efforts across Australia, France, and domestic stockpiling.
Hormuz Shipping Chokepoint Risk
Iran’s leverage over the Strait of Hormuz remains the single biggest external business risk, with roughly one-fifth of global oil and gas trade exposed to disruption, transit restrictions, toll demands, mine-clearing delays, and renewed military incidents affecting shipping insurance and freight costs.
USMCA Review and Tariff Uncertainty
Mexico’s top business risk is USMCA uncertainty as Washington keeps auto, steel and aluminum tariffs and pushes stricter rules of origin. With more than 80% of Mexican exports bound for the US, prolonged annual reviews would weaken investment planning and cross-border supply chains.
Judicial Reform and Legal Certainty
Institutional uncertainty remains a material investor concern as the government revisits parts of judicial reform after controversy over judge elections and weak turnout. Businesses face persistent questions over contract enforcement, dispute resolution, and the broader reliability of Mexico’s legal environment.
Semiconductor Concentration and AI
Taiwan remains the central hub for advanced chip production underpinning AI, data centers, and high-performance computing. Major firms continue expanding locally, but the concentration of fabrication and packaging capacity keeps global manufacturers, investors, and customers exposed to outsized geopolitical and operational concentration risk.
Saudi logistics hub acceleration
Saudi Arabia is rapidly strengthening its logistics position through Red Sea ports, overland corridors, and new shipping services. Authorities highlighted more than 19 new maritime lines and alternative routes, improving resilience and creating opportunities in warehousing, distribution, manufacturing, and cross-border supply-chain redesign.
Indo-Pacific Maritime Security Risks
With 60% of global maritime trade passing through the Indo-Pacific, Australia is prioritising freedom of navigation, maritime surveillance and port resilience through Quad initiatives, reflecting rising risks to shipping lanes, fuel imports, insurance costs and regional logistics reliability.
Agricultural and Aerospace Deal Uncertainty
Recent US-China understandings on $17 billion annual farm purchases and an initial 200 Boeing aircraft order remain preliminary and unevenly confirmed. Exporters, logistics providers, and investors should treat these commitments cautiously because implementation risk, political reversals, and timing uncertainty remain significant.
Maritime chokepoints and war risk
Regional conflict has made Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb the dominant risk to Saudi trade. With more than 70% of crude exports redirected via Yanbu, any Red Sea disruption would raise freight, insurance, delivery times, and energy-market volatility.
Climate and Infrastructure Resilience
Under the IMF’s resilience facility, Pakistan is advancing disaster-risk financing and integrating climate considerations into budgeting and investment planning. This should support adaptation spending over time, but near-term businesses must still price in flood, heat and infrastructure disruption risks.
Ceasefire Deadlock Delays Reconstruction
Negotiations remain stalled over Hamas disarmament, Israeli withdrawals, and Gaza governance, delaying any credible reconstruction framework. That prolongs humanitarian strain, complicates donor engagement, limits cross-border commercial normalization, and sustains political risk premiums for regional investors and counterparties.
Political Volatility and Policy Execution
Leadership tensions around Keir Starmer, cabinet disagreements and visible policy reversals have increased uncertainty over execution. For international firms, this raises the risk of abrupt changes in trade, taxation, industrial policy and regulation, complicating long-term investment and operating decisions.
Shipping and Trade Route Exposure
Conflict-linked instability continues to affect Israel’s trade environment through shipping uncertainty, rerouting, and elevated maritime risk tied to the broader Eastern Mediterranean and Red Sea theater, pressuring import costs, delivery times, inventory planning, and supply-chain resilience for manufacturers and retailers.
High Rates And Inflation
The central bank kept rates at 19% deposit and 20% lending, while headline inflation stood at 14.9% in April. Elevated borrowing costs, exchange-rate sensitivity, and imported inflation continue to pressure consumer demand, working capital, and investment planning across sectors.
India FTA implementation uncertainty
Implementation of the UK-India free trade agreement may slip to autumn 2026 as steel safeguard disputes persist, creating uncertainty for tariff planning, sourcing strategies, and market-entry timing for firms expecting improved access across goods, services, and investment flows.
Persistent Inflation and Cost Pressures
April headline inflation eased to 4.2%, but underlying inflation rose to 3.4% and housing costs remained elevated at 6.3%. Fuel, freight and construction inputs continue pressuring margins, sustaining high operating costs and complicating pricing, investment, and financing decisions.
Tariff Regime Volatility Intensifies
Washington is expanding tariff use through Section 301 and revised Section 232 actions, including proposed 10% to 12.5% duties on 60 economies and altered metal tariffs. Import costs, sourcing models, customs exposure, and pricing strategies are becoming materially less predictable.
USMCA Review and Tariff Risk
Mexico’s top business risk is the USMCA review, with Washington maintaining tariffs and seeking stricter rules of origin. More than 80% of Mexican exports go to the US, so changes could reshape autos, steel, agriculture, investment planning, and regional supply chains.
US Tariff Truce Fragility
Germany’s export model remains exposed to volatile transatlantic trade policy. The EU-US deal preserves 15% tariffs on most EU goods and avoids a threatened 25% auto tariff, but safeguard disputes and Trump-era unpredictability keep planning risk elevated.
Defense expansion boosts industry
France is debating a higher military spending path, with government plans lifting defense outlays to €436 billion by 2030 and senators pushing further. This supports aerospace, electronics, and dual-use manufacturing, but intensifies fiscal trade-offs and procurement reprioritization across sectors.
Carbon Pricing Investment Reset
Canada and Alberta agreed to raise Alberta’s effective industrial carbon price toward C$130 per tonne by 2040, with a price floor and 75 million tonnes of carbon contracts for difference. The package improves policy visibility but raises cost pressures for emissions-intensive sectors.
Defense Expansion, Budget Tensions
France is increasing military spending toward €436 billion by 2030, though parliament is disputing the scale and financing. The trend supports aerospace, defense manufacturing and strategic technologies, but deepens fiscal trade-offs that may squeeze civilian spending and subsidies.
Harder Screening for Foreign Capital
CFIUS scrutiny is intensifying for foreign investors in US critical technologies, including AI, semiconductors, biotech, and cybersecurity. Even small stakes can trigger review, delays, or mitigation, affecting cross-border venture flows, deal structuring, and timelines for international investors entering US assets.
High Energy Costs Squeeze Industry
Elevated gas and power prices continue to erode German industrial competitiveness, especially in chemicals, manufacturing, and suppliers. Around 70% of firms now cite energy and raw-material costs as their main risk, while higher input prices are compressing margins and discouraging new investment.