Mission Grey Daily Brief - October 26, 2024
Summary of the Global Situation for Businesses and Investors
The war in Ukraine continues to dominate global affairs, with North Korean troops moving towards the frontline and Russian forces suffering record casualty rates. Elon Musk is accused of having close ties with Vladimir Putin, withholding Starlink access from Taiwan as a favour to China. US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announced new sanctions targeting secondary entities in countries supplying Russia with critical items for its military. Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko threatened war if Russia attempts to annex Belarus. South Korea is threatening to arm Ukraine in response to North Korea's support for Russia. Putin hosted the BRICS summit in Russia, praising its role as a counterbalance to the West's "perverse methods", and pushing for the creation of a new payment system as an alternative to the SWIFT network. Israel launched a retaliatory strike on Iran.
Russia's War in Ukraine
The war in Ukraine continues to be a major concern for businesses and investors, with the conflict entering its 975th day and Russian forces suffering record casualty rates. North Korean troops are moving towards the frontline, posing a significant threat to Ukraine's defence. Vladimir Putin is pulling Kim Jong Un deeper into the war, revealing a weakness in the Kremlin's ability to recruit troops at home. North Korea's infusion of fresh soldiers will remain practically risk-free for Pyongyang, unless the United States returns to its aggressive sanctions posture against the Kim regime. Russia is no stranger to employing foreign armies, with Cossack warriors famously fighting for the tsars in centuries past and the Red Army bolstering its ranks with Mongolian troops when it invaded China at the end of World War II. Today, the "TikTok soldiers" of Chechen warlord Ramzan Kadyrov are scattered across Ukraine's front lines.
After nearly three years of fighting, Putin is running low on cannon fodder. The Kremlin is finding it difficult and expensive to entice more of Russia's poor and desperate to sign up for the war, even with promises of bonuses and good pay. In theory, Moscow could force millions of its fighting-age men into the Ukrainian meat grinder through conscription, but this option is politically perilous. The Putin regime discovered the dangers of the draft when it briefly attempted a "partial mobilization" in September 2022, with Russians responding with howls of opposition. The government quickly backed off of the effort, informing many that their call-up orders were issued by "mistake". Since then, Russia has relied on mercenary groups and lucrative payouts to make the "golden handshake" in exchange for military service in Ukraine. Even these enticements are proving to be insufficient for the Kremlin's manpower needs.
By providing fresh troops to Russia, North Korea will likely help to backfill some, but not all, of Moscow's gaps. US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin warned the news is a "very, very serious issue", but cautioned that the precise contribution of Pyongyang's troops remained unknown. For the Kim regime, support for Russia has many strategic benefits and few risks. First, protection from United Nations sanctions. Russia has used its Security Council veto to repeatedly shield North Korea from international monitoring and penalties for its prohibited missile tests and nuclear weapons development. Second, a security guarantee from the world's largest nuclear power. This summer, Moscow and Pyongyang agreed to a NATO-style mutual defense pledge, promising to aid each other in the event of war. Third, North Korea's troops will gain valuable combat experience if they survive. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the Kim regime will likely benefit from Russian technology transfers that could greatly accelerate its missile and nuclear programs.
In exchange, the costs to North Korea are a pittance. An expeditionary force of roughly 12,000 soldiers is small potatoes compared to Kim's million-man army. His related shipments of around three million artillery shells to Russia is also a small fraction of his total stockpile. The danger to Ukraine is great, however, with a senior Ukrainian official stating that the addition of North Korean artillery on the battlefield has been "much worse than the Shaheds", the Iranian-designed kamikaze drones that Russia is using to pound Kyiv's troops and infrastructure.
Elon Musk's Alleged Ties with Vladimir Putin
Elon Musk is accused of having close ties with Vladimir Putin, withholding Starlink access from Taiwan as a favour to China. The Wall Street Journal reported that Putin asked Musk to withhold Starlink from Taiwan as a favour to China's Xi Jinping, with unnamed officials stating that Musk has been in regular contact with Putin since 2022. The Journal reported that in late 2023, Musk received his first request from the Kremlin to refrain from activating Starlink over Taiwan, citing a former Russian intelligence officer. The request was made for Beijing's sake, as Moscow increasingly relied on trade from China. Based on The Journal's findings, it's unclear exactly how many times Putin or his administration asked Musk for the favour.
The Chinese embassy in Washington told The Journal that it was not aware of the specifics of this arrangement, and did not respond to a separate request for comment sent outside regular business hours by Business Insider. Taiwan does not have official Starlink access because its laws require satellite services to be provided through a joint venture with a local operator that maintains majority ownership. The New York Times reported that SpaceX was unwilling to accept such an arrangement, and the self-governed island is thus creating its own low-earth orbit satellite network. Musk's reported conversations with Putin coincide with his apparent shift in rhetoric toward Ukraine in late 2022. Until that point, the billionaire had vocally supported Kyiv, providing it with 15,000 Starlink terminals.
In October of that year, he began seeking funding from the Pentagon to continue the free services, tweeting that they were taking a financial toll. Musk also tweeted a poll that month about a peace plan reflecting some of Russia's war demands at the time, including Russia's formal obtaining of Crimea and a guarantee of Ukraine's neutrality. The billionaire's post drew the fury of pro-Ukrainian accounts, but he added that he only suggested those measures to avoid further death in Ukraine and the risk of nuclear war. "Obviously, we are pro-Ukraine", he tweeted, saying that SpaceX had spent about $80 million on free Starlink for Ukraine. Two weeks later, Ian Bremmer, a political scientist who founded Eurasia Group, wrote in an email to his subscribers that Musk had spoken with Putin before tweeting this controversial peace plan. Per Bremmer, Putin had told Musk that if he could not accomplish his goals in Ukraine, he would turn to "major escalation". Musk and the Kremlin said Bremmer's report was untrue.
The allegations present awkward implications for the US, with Musk's SpaceX holding defense and space contracts with the Pentagon and NASA. An analysis published on Monday by The New York Times reported that the company has $3.6 billion in contracts with the Defense Department — primarily for launching American satellites into orbit — and $11.8 billion with NASA. Russian forces were reported to be buying up Starlink terminals earlier this year to help their invasion of Ukraine. The system has been vital to Ukrainian forces over the two-year conflict. But Russian agents are reportedly now using 'intermediaries' in Dubai in order to get their hands on the terminals, circumventing western sanctions imposed on Russia. House Democrats warned that Russia's use of the system in Ukraine could raise national security concerns in March. In a letter to SpaceX, two Democrats on the House Oversight Committee demanded information about Russia's potential illegal acquisition of the satellite-enabled terminals, according to the Washington Post. The letter cited recent allegations from Ukrainian intelligence officials, who say that Russian troops are using Starlink terminals to coordinate war efforts in eastern Ukraine, in potential violation of US sanctions.
As founder of SpaceX, Musk has cultivated close ties with US military and intelligence, with access to sensitive information. The company is the primary rocket launcher for both NASA and the Pentagon. Starlink has said it does not do any business in or with Russia, and Musk has branded claims of association with Putin "absurd". Dmitry Peskov, spokesperson for the Kremlin, insisted neither Putin nor the Kremlin were in regular contact with Musk. Musk has not yet commented on the claims published in the WSJ. The Kremlin today slammed the claims in the WSJ report as "not true" and "absolutely false". While Beijing remains officially neutral on the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, it has supported Putin's claims that the war was provoked by western aggression. The US this month imposed its first sanctions on Chinese firms for making weapons for Russia, accusing them of collaborating with Russian defence firms to produce drones vital to the war effort.
US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen Announces New Sanctions
US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announced new sanctions targeting secondary entities in countries supplying Russia with critical items for its military. Yellen told world financial leaders gathered in Washington for annual meetings of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank that "We will unveil strong new sanctions targeting those facilitating the Kremlin's war machine, including intermediaries in third countries that are supplying Russia with critical inputs for its military". The IMF and World Bank meetings mark the last major international finance gathering to be held during President Joe Biden's administration and come as the state of the economy and inflation are top concerns for American voters. The presidential election between the Republican party nominee, former President Donald Trump, and Democratic party nominee Vice President Kamala Harris is slated to be decided on November 5, with the outcome expected to have an enormous impact on global finance and the world's economy.
Yellen touched on the use of the proceeds from frozen Russian sovereign assets to provide loans for Ukraine. As she spoke, the European Parliament approved a loan of up to 35 billion euros ($38 billion) for Ukraine's defense and reconstruction that will be repaid using future revenues from Russian central bank assets frozen abroad. Yellen referred to the overall $50 billion loan package being negotiated by the Group of Seven and EU allies, saying the United States expects to be able to contribute $20 billion. The U.S. Treasury Department is "working tirelessly to unlock the economic value of frozen Russian sovereign assets to aid Ukraine", Yellen said. Earlier on October 22, Britain announced its readiness to provide Ukraine with a loan of<co: 2>Earlier on October 22, Britain announced its readiness to provide Ukraine with a loan of
Further Reading:
As North Korea, Iran and China support Russia’s war, is a ‘new axis’ emerging? - CNN
If South Korea decides to get involved in Ukraine, it has powerful options - Business Insider
Israel launches retaliatory strike on Iran - Financial Times
Lukashenko warns of war if Russia attempts to annex Belarus - RBC-Ukraine
North Korea’s troops reveal Putin’s Ukraine pickle — no more cannon fodder - New York Post
Putin 'asked Elon Musk to switch off internet over Taiwan as a favour to China' - Daily Mail
Vance says it is Ukraine's decision to end the war - NBC News
Vladimir Putin signals North Korean troops are in Russia - Financial Times
Themes around the World:
US-Israel ties shape market outlook
Netanyahu’s Washington meetings highlighted policy friction but continued strategic interdependence on Iran, Gaza, Lebanon, and Syria. For business, this keeps US diplomatic backing broadly intact while preserving uncertainty around sanctions, military action, and regional regulatory or financing conditions.
US tariffs and transatlantic exposure
UK businesses face renewed exposure to US policy risk as 10% tariffs reportedly hit textiles, clothing, chemicals and other goods, while broader dependence on Washington in trade and defence raises uncertainty for exporters, manufacturers, and cross-border investment strategies.
Tax and Industrial Policy Signaling
Trump is pairing tariff advocacy with tax incentives from the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' and strong reshoring rhetoric ahead of midterms, shaping corporate location and lobbying decisions. However, reports also highlight political contestation over consumer costs, subsidy rollbacks, and the real manufacturing payoff.
Railway build-out reshapes logistics
Both governments agreed to accelerate phase one of the China-Thailand railway and define phase two implementation, with Thailand targeting completion around 2030. The project could materially alter inland freight flows, cross-border sourcing patterns and industrial location decisions for exporters.
US-China Rare Earth Tensions Persist Ahead Summit
China's incomplete compliance with the Busan trade deal on rare earth exports constrains US manufacturers and defense contractors. Washington avoids public retaliation to preserve a September Trump-Xi summit, leaving critical mineral supply chains uncertain for businesses planning investments.
Investment decisions face delay
Recent reporting indicates trade uncertainty is already weighing on Mexico’s economy and investment pipeline, with one estimate showing business investment down 6.8% and growth seen near 1.1% in 2026. Firms may defer plant, supplier and logistics expansion decisions.
Israeli gas dependence intensifies
Egypt’s domestic gas shortfall is reinforcing reliance on Israeli supplies. One report cited consumption at 6.39 billion cubic feet daily versus output of 3.86 billion, while imports from Israel rose 30.5% year on year in May 2026.
Hardening China trade stance
Berlin has aligned more closely with Paris on tougher EU trade defenses toward China, citing a roughly €360 billion EU goods deficit in 2025. Faster investigations, emergency safeguards and broader defense tools could reshape German sourcing, export access and investment planning.
Export Proceeds Controls Tighten
Indonesia’s new DHE rules require natural-resource exporters to repatriate 100% of proceeds, with retention periods of three months for oil and gas and 12 months for non-oil sectors. The policy improves domestic FX liquidity but may tighten treasury flexibility for commodity exporters.
Berlin hardens China resilience
German authorities are mapping Chinese economic vulnerabilities and preparing 34 resilience measures to reduce strategic dependencies. Focus areas include semiconductors, rare earths, critical machinery and technical servicing, signaling tighter risk management, possible controls, and more scrutiny for cross-border operations.
Standards and market-access barriers
India’s expanding Quality Control Orders, tariff revisions and import restrictions are drawing strong WTO scrutiny, with 44 members submitting 1,094 questions. For multinationals, this increases compliance complexity, certification risk and uncertainty around product access and sourcing decisions.
Canal revenues remain under pressure
Red Sea insecurity continues to undermine a core Egyptian hard-currency source. Suez Canal revenue fell from $10.25 billion in 2023 to about $4 billion in 2024, with ship passages dropping from over 26,000 to roughly 13,000 as carriers reroute around Africa.
Gas exports face approval uncertainty
Reports of a non-binding MoU to export up to 80 billion cubic meters from the Tamar field, valued around $20 billion, highlight upside in regional energy trade, but Egyptian denial and pending Israeli approvals underscore execution and policy uncertainty.
Russia Sanctions Reshape Trade
The EU’s 21st sanctions package expands restrictions on Russian banks, crypto platforms, shadow-fleet vessels, refineries, ports, and oil traders, increasing compliance burdens and enforcement risks for firms operating in regional finance, shipping, energy trading, and dual-use supply chains linked to Ukraine.
Forced-labor tariffs reshape market access
Washington imposed a 12.5% Section 301 tariff on Vietnam over forced-labor concerns, despite Hanoi’s new Decree 292 banning forced-labor imports. The move raises landed costs, pressures supplier due diligence, and may alter US-bound product mix and investment returns.
South China Sea Security Risk
Renewed confrontation between China and the Philippines underscores persistent South China Sea instability, directly relevant to Vietnam as a claimant state. With roughly one-third of global shipping transiting these waters, any escalation could disrupt maritime insurance, shipping schedules, and regional investor sentiment.
Trade diplomacy and diversification
Jakarta is intensifying consultations with USTR to widen product exemptions and secure more favorable treatment, while accelerating alternative market access through IEU-CEPA, I-EAEU FTA, ICA-CEPA, IA-CEPA, IK-CEPA, and RCEP to reduce dependence on US demand.
Military-industrial supply chains targeted
New restrictions focused on 56 military-industrial actors, including 37 linked to long-range drones, plus 51 entities in Russia and third countries supplying dual-use goods. This heightens export-control risk for electronics, specialty metals, aerospace components and industrial equipment touching Russian networks.
US Tariffs Pressure UK Exports
Washington renewed a 10% tariff on British goods, affecting a market worth £66 billion in 2024, or 17% of UK goods exports. Exemptions for whisky and medical technology help, but UK firms still face margin pressure and competitiveness risks.
Pharmaceutical Supply Chain Reshoring Mandated
Trump threatened 100% tariffs on generic drug manufacturers unless they relocate production to the US by 2028. The ultimatum targets factories primarily in India, Europe, and China that supply affordable generics, potentially upending global pharmaceutical supply chains and raising medicine costs.
Modern Slavery Compliance Tightens
The tariff dispute has accelerated Australia’s tougher anti-modern slavery agenda, with proposed stronger penalties and possible criminal exposure for large companies failing to address supply-chain abuses. Exporters and investors face higher due-diligence costs, stricter reporting, and more rigorous supplier screening.
Gaza reconstruction governance transition
The emerging postwar framework envisages a technocratic Palestinian administration, humanitarian aid surge, international force deployment, and phased transfer of authority in Gaza. If implemented, it could create reconstruction opportunities, but political contestation and weak enforcement mechanisms still cloud execution.
China Ties Stay Fraught
Australia continues balancing deep commercial dependence on China with sharper security tensions. Officials stressed China remains the largest trading partner, while diplomatic frictions over Taiwan and regional security create volatility for market access, investor sentiment, and strategic planning.
European capital diversifies partnerships
As global fragmentation intensifies, Pretoria is deepening commercial engagement with Europe. Ramaphosa’s Paris visit secured EUR 1.11 billion in French investment pledges and advanced talks on transport infrastructure and civilian nuclear energy, supporting diversification away from concentrated geopolitical dependencies.
South China Sea security exposure
Vietnam’s emphasis on freedom of navigation, alongside recent U.S. carrier visits and regional tensions, underscores persistent maritime security risk. For international business, any deterioration in South China Sea stability could disrupt shipping confidence, insurance costs, energy flows, and port-centered logistics planning.
Canal revenue collapse pressure
Red Sea insecurity has sharply reduced Suez traffic, with canal revenue falling from $10.25 billion in 2023 to about $4 billion in 2024 and ship passages roughly halving. The foreign-exchange hit constrains Egypt’s fiscal space, import capacity, and macro stability.
Imported Inflation Hits Consumer Demand
Imported inflation from yen weakness and energy prices is eroding household purchasing power, while household spending has already fallen for six consecutive months. Businesses face a tougher operating environment in which demand softness coexists with rising input and wage costs.
Bank of Japan tightening expectations
Following intervention, markets increasingly expect another Bank of Japan rate hike, with reports citing a 72% chance before October and two-year JGB yields reaching 1.545%. Higher borrowing costs would affect financing, valuations, and domestic demand conditions for investors and operators.
Deeper EU reset under discussion
New signals from London indicate broader EU engagement may extend to food and drink trade, border controls, electricity cooperation, defence links and youth mobility, potentially reshaping market access, compliance obligations, labour availability, and long-term trade strategy for international firms.
US-China Technology Decoupling Intensifies
Washington bans devices containing Huawei components, proposes MATCH Act restricting lithography sales, while China considers AI model export controls. SMIC achieves 5nm production using multi-patterning workarounds as both nations treat advanced AI and chips as strategic national security assets.
Defense Spending Reshapes Industry
Canberra announced an additional A$4.6 billion for AUKUS submarine shipyard development, taking total Osborne yard investment to A$8.5 billion. The spending supports sovereign industrial capacity, with implications for advanced manufacturing, procurement pipelines, and defense-adjacent infrastructure suppliers.
Municipal Procurement Scrutiny Expands
Raids in Izmit, Antalya, Kırıkkale, Istanbul and Ankara over alleged bribery and tender manipulation show expanding enforcement around opposition-run municipalities. Companies exposed to local public contracts face higher counterparty, procurement, and compliance risks amid politicized tender environments.
US tariff uncertainty persists
More than 60% of German industrial firms report negative effects from US tariff policy despite the Turnberry deal capping most duties at 15%. Continued uncertainty, plus elevated steel and aluminum tariffs, complicates export planning, investment timing and transatlantic supply-chain decisions.
Water Infrastructure Reform Push
Government’s National Water Action Plan introduces licensing standards, utility ring-fencing and R24 billion a year for water and sanitation projects. With treated-water losses near 50%, reforms are material for manufacturers, retailers and property operators dependent on reliable municipal supply.
Korea-US investment commitments under pressure
Seoul’s 2025 deal exchanging a lower US tariff rate for $350 billion in Korean investment is becoming operational leverage, with US officials seen as pressing for faster implementation, raising execution pressure on Korean firms’ outbound capital allocation and localization strategies.
AUKUS Spending Reshapes Industry
The government announced a A$4.6 billion boost for Osborne shipyards, taking announced AUKUS-related shipyard investment to A$8.5 billion. This expands defence-industrial demand, tightens competition for skilled labour and inputs, and channels procurement opportunities into advanced manufacturing and infrastructure.