Return to Homepage
Image

Mission Grey Daily Brief - October 26, 2024

Summary of the Global Situation for Businesses and Investors

The war in Ukraine continues to dominate global affairs, with North Korean troops moving towards the frontline and Russian forces suffering record casualty rates. Elon Musk is accused of having close ties with Vladimir Putin, withholding Starlink access from Taiwan as a favour to China. US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announced new sanctions targeting secondary entities in countries supplying Russia with critical items for its military. Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko threatened war if Russia attempts to annex Belarus. South Korea is threatening to arm Ukraine in response to North Korea's support for Russia. Putin hosted the BRICS summit in Russia, praising its role as a counterbalance to the West's "perverse methods", and pushing for the creation of a new payment system as an alternative to the SWIFT network. Israel launched a retaliatory strike on Iran.

Russia's War in Ukraine

The war in Ukraine continues to be a major concern for businesses and investors, with the conflict entering its 975th day and Russian forces suffering record casualty rates. North Korean troops are moving towards the frontline, posing a significant threat to Ukraine's defence. Vladimir Putin is pulling Kim Jong Un deeper into the war, revealing a weakness in the Kremlin's ability to recruit troops at home. North Korea's infusion of fresh soldiers will remain practically risk-free for Pyongyang, unless the United States returns to its aggressive sanctions posture against the Kim regime. Russia is no stranger to employing foreign armies, with Cossack warriors famously fighting for the tsars in centuries past and the Red Army bolstering its ranks with Mongolian troops when it invaded China at the end of World War II. Today, the "TikTok soldiers" of Chechen warlord Ramzan Kadyrov are scattered across Ukraine's front lines.

After nearly three years of fighting, Putin is running low on cannon fodder. The Kremlin is finding it difficult and expensive to entice more of Russia's poor and desperate to sign up for the war, even with promises of bonuses and good pay. In theory, Moscow could force millions of its fighting-age men into the Ukrainian meat grinder through conscription, but this option is politically perilous. The Putin regime discovered the dangers of the draft when it briefly attempted a "partial mobilization" in September 2022, with Russians responding with howls of opposition. The government quickly backed off of the effort, informing many that their call-up orders were issued by "mistake". Since then, Russia has relied on mercenary groups and lucrative payouts to make the "golden handshake" in exchange for military service in Ukraine. Even these enticements are proving to be insufficient for the Kremlin's manpower needs.

By providing fresh troops to Russia, North Korea will likely help to backfill some, but not all, of Moscow's gaps. US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin warned the news is a "very, very serious issue", but cautioned that the precise contribution of Pyongyang's troops remained unknown. For the Kim regime, support for Russia has many strategic benefits and few risks. First, protection from United Nations sanctions. Russia has used its Security Council veto to repeatedly shield North Korea from international monitoring and penalties for its prohibited missile tests and nuclear weapons development. Second, a security guarantee from the world's largest nuclear power. This summer, Moscow and Pyongyang agreed to a NATO-style mutual defense pledge, promising to aid each other in the event of war. Third, North Korea's troops will gain valuable combat experience if they survive. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the Kim regime will likely benefit from Russian technology transfers that could greatly accelerate its missile and nuclear programs.

In exchange, the costs to North Korea are a pittance. An expeditionary force of roughly 12,000 soldiers is small potatoes compared to Kim's million-man army. His related shipments of around three million artillery shells to Russia is also a small fraction of his total stockpile. The danger to Ukraine is great, however, with a senior Ukrainian official stating that the addition of North Korean artillery on the battlefield has been "much worse than the Shaheds", the Iranian-designed kamikaze drones that Russia is using to pound Kyiv's troops and infrastructure.

Elon Musk's Alleged Ties with Vladimir Putin

Elon Musk is accused of having close ties with Vladimir Putin, withholding Starlink access from Taiwan as a favour to China. The Wall Street Journal reported that Putin asked Musk to withhold Starlink from Taiwan as a favour to China's Xi Jinping, with unnamed officials stating that Musk has been in regular contact with Putin since 2022. The Journal reported that in late 2023, Musk received his first request from the Kremlin to refrain from activating Starlink over Taiwan, citing a former Russian intelligence officer. The request was made for Beijing's sake, as Moscow increasingly relied on trade from China. Based on The Journal's findings, it's unclear exactly how many times Putin or his administration asked Musk for the favour.

The Chinese embassy in Washington told The Journal that it was not aware of the specifics of this arrangement, and did not respond to a separate request for comment sent outside regular business hours by Business Insider. Taiwan does not have official Starlink access because its laws require satellite services to be provided through a joint venture with a local operator that maintains majority ownership. The New York Times reported that SpaceX was unwilling to accept such an arrangement, and the self-governed island is thus creating its own low-earth orbit satellite network. Musk's reported conversations with Putin coincide with his apparent shift in rhetoric toward Ukraine in late 2022. Until that point, the billionaire had vocally supported Kyiv, providing it with 15,000 Starlink terminals.

In October of that year, he began seeking funding from the Pentagon to continue the free services, tweeting that they were taking a financial toll. Musk also tweeted a poll that month about a peace plan reflecting some of Russia's war demands at the time, including Russia's formal obtaining of Crimea and a guarantee of Ukraine's neutrality. The billionaire's post drew the fury of pro-Ukrainian accounts, but he added that he only suggested those measures to avoid further death in Ukraine and the risk of nuclear war. "Obviously, we are pro-Ukraine", he tweeted, saying that SpaceX had spent about $80 million on free Starlink for Ukraine. Two weeks later, Ian Bremmer, a political scientist who founded Eurasia Group, wrote in an email to his subscribers that Musk had spoken with Putin before tweeting this controversial peace plan. Per Bremmer, Putin had told Musk that if he could not accomplish his goals in Ukraine, he would turn to "major escalation". Musk and the Kremlin said Bremmer's report was untrue.

The allegations present awkward implications for the US, with Musk's SpaceX holding defense and space contracts with the Pentagon and NASA. An analysis published on Monday by The New York Times reported that the company has $3.6 billion in contracts with the Defense Department — primarily for launching American satellites into orbit — and $11.8 billion with NASA. Russian forces were reported to be buying up Starlink terminals earlier this year to help their invasion of Ukraine. The system has been vital to Ukrainian forces over the two-year conflict. But Russian agents are reportedly now using 'intermediaries' in Dubai in order to get their hands on the terminals, circumventing western sanctions imposed on Russia. House Democrats warned that Russia's use of the system in Ukraine could raise national security concerns in March. In a letter to SpaceX, two Democrats on the House Oversight Committee demanded information about Russia's potential illegal acquisition of the satellite-enabled terminals, according to the Washington Post. The letter cited recent allegations from Ukrainian intelligence officials, who say that Russian troops are using Starlink terminals to coordinate war efforts in eastern Ukraine, in potential violation of US sanctions.

As founder of SpaceX, Musk has cultivated close ties with US military and intelligence, with access to sensitive information. The company is the primary rocket launcher for both NASA and the Pentagon. Starlink has said it does not do any business in or with Russia, and Musk has branded claims of association with Putin "absurd". Dmitry Peskov, spokesperson for the Kremlin, insisted neither Putin nor the Kremlin were in regular contact with Musk. Musk has not yet commented on the claims published in the WSJ. The Kremlin today slammed the claims in the WSJ report as "not true" and "absolutely false". While Beijing remains officially neutral on the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, it has supported Putin's claims that the war was provoked by western aggression. The US this month imposed its first sanctions on Chinese firms for making weapons for Russia, accusing them of collaborating with Russian defence firms to produce drones vital to the war effort.

US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen Announces New Sanctions

US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announced new sanctions targeting secondary entities in countries supplying Russia with critical items for its military. Yellen told world financial leaders gathered in Washington for annual meetings of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank that "We will unveil strong new sanctions targeting those facilitating the Kremlin's war machine, including intermediaries in third countries that are supplying Russia with critical inputs for its military". The IMF and World Bank meetings mark the last major international finance gathering to be held during President Joe Biden's administration and come as the state of the economy and inflation are top concerns for American voters. The presidential election between the Republican party nominee, former President Donald Trump, and Democratic party nominee Vice President Kamala Harris is slated to be decided on November 5, with the outcome expected to have an enormous impact on global finance and the world's economy.

Yellen touched on the use of the proceeds from frozen Russian sovereign assets to provide loans for Ukraine. As she spoke, the European Parliament approved a loan of up to 35 billion euros ($38 billion) for Ukraine's defense and reconstruction that will be repaid using future revenues from Russian central bank assets frozen abroad. Yellen referred to the overall $50 billion loan package being negotiated by the Group of Seven and EU allies, saying the United States expects to be able to contribute $20 billion. The U.S. Treasury Department is "working tirelessly to unlock the economic value of frozen Russian sovereign assets to aid Ukraine", Yellen said. Earlier on October 22, Britain announced its readiness to provide Ukraine with a loan of<co: 2>Earlier on October 22, Britain announced its readiness to provide Ukraine with a loan of


Further Reading:

As North Korea, Iran and China support Russia’s war, is a ‘new axis’ emerging? - CNN

If South Korea decides to get involved in Ukraine, it has powerful options - Business Insider

Israel launches retaliatory strike on Iran - Financial Times

Lukashenko warns of war if Russia attempts to annex Belarus - RBC-Ukraine

MEPs Denounce Azerbaijan's Rights Violations Ahead Of Key Conference - Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty

North Korea’s troops reveal Putin’s Ukraine pickle — no more cannon fodder - New York Post

Putin 'asked Elon Musk to switch off internet over Taiwan as a favour to China' - Daily Mail

Putin hosts growing BRICS alliance in Russia, touting it as an alternative to the West's "perverse methods" - CBS News

Putin once asked Elon Musk to not activate Starlink over Taiwan as a favor to Xi Jinping: report - Business Insider

Russo-Ukrainian War, day 975: Russian forces suffer record casualty rates as North Korean troops move towards the frontline - Euromaidan Press

Ukraine calls on North Korean soldiers to surrender and promises safety, food and medical care - Euronews

Vance says it is Ukraine's decision to end the war - NBC News

Vladimir Putin signals North Korean troops are in Russia - Financial Times

Themes around the World:

Flag

Supply chain realignment and friend-shoring

U.S. economic security doctrine is reinforcing regionalization and ‘friend-shoring,’ influencing sourcing, logistics hubs, and capital flows toward allied jurisdictions. Companies are adopting dual supply chains, higher inventory buffers, and geopolitical risk premiums, raising costs but improving resilience.

Flag

Advanced chip reshoring accelerates

TSMC’s plan to mass-produce 3nm chips in Kumamoto, reportedly around US$17bn investment with added Japanese subsidies, deepens local supply. It strengthens Japan’s AI/auto ecosystems, but intensifies competition for talent, power, and water infrastructure.

Flag

Bahnnetz-Sanierung stört Logistik

Großbaustellen bei der Bahn (u.a. Köln–Hagen monatelang gesperrt) verlängern Laufzeiten im Personen- und Güterverkehr und erhöhen Ausweichkosten. Für internationale Lieferketten steigen Pufferbedarf, Lagerhaltung und multimodale Planung; zugleich bleibt die Finanzierung langfristiger Netzmodernisierung unsicher.

Flag

Supply chain resilience and logistics

Tariff-driven front-loading, shifting sourcing geographies, and periodic transport disruptions are increasing inventory costs and lead-time variability. Firms are redesigning networks—splitting production, adding redundancy, and diversifying ports and carriers—raising working capital needs but reducing single-point failure exposure.

Flag

Electricity reform and tariff shock

Eskom restructuring remains contested, but Ramaphosa reaffirmed an independent transmission entity and 2026 transmission tenders. Meanwhile Nersa-approved hikes of ~8.8% in 2026/27 and 2027/28 raise input costs, affecting energy-intensive industry, pricing and investment.

Flag

Financial sector tightening and de-risking

Sanctions expansion to ~20 additional regional banks plus crypto platforms used for circumvention increases payment friction. International counterparties face higher KYC/AML burdens, blocked settlements, and trapped receivables, accelerating “de-risking” by global banks and insurers.

Flag

Semiconductor and electronics scale-up

Budget 2026 doubles electronics component incentives to ₹40,000 crore and advances ISM 2.0 to deepen design, equipment, and materials capacity. This accelerates supplier localization and India-plus-one strategies, while raising competition for talent and requiring careful IP, export-control, and vendor qualification planning.

Flag

Energy policy boosts LNG exports

A shift toward faster permitting and “regular order” approvals for LNG terminals and non-FTA exports signals higher medium-term US gas supply to Europe and Asia. This supports long-term contracting but can raise domestic price volatility and regulatory swings for energy-intensive industries.

Flag

Currency collapse and inflation shock

The rial’s rapid depreciation and high inflation undermine pricing, working capital, and import affordability, driving ad hoc controls and payment delays. Businesses face FX convertibility risk, volatile local demand, and greater reliance on barter, intermediaries, and informal settlement channels.

Flag

Regional HQ and market access leverage

Riyadh continues using policy to anchor multinationals locally, linking government contracting and strategic opportunities to in‑kingdom presence. Reports indicate over 200 companies have relocated HQs to Riyadh. This affects corporate structuring, tax residency, talent deployment, and bid competitiveness.

Flag

EU accession-driven regulatory convergence

Kyiv targets EU membership by 2027, accelerating alignment on standards, customs, competition, and public procurement. For exporters and investors this can reduce long-term market access friction, but creates near-term compliance churn, documentation demands, and shifting tariff and quota regimes.

Flag

Sanctions enforcement intensifies at sea

UK and allies are escalating action against Russia’s ‘shadow fleet’, including interdictions, proposed boarding powers and broader maritime-services bans. Shipping, insurers, traders and banks face higher compliance burdens, detention risk, route disruption and potentially higher freight and war-risk premiums.

Flag

Data privacy enforcement escalates

Proposed amendments to the Personal Information Protection Act would expand corporate liability for breaches by shifting burden of proof and toughening penalties. High-profile cases (e.g., Coupang, telecom) increase litigation, remediation, and audit demand across retail, fintech, and cloud supply chains.

Flag

Balochistan security threatens projects

Militant violence in Balochistan is disrupting logistics and deterring FDI, including audits and security redesigns around the $7bn Reko Diq project. Attacks on rail and highways raise insurance, security and schedule costs for mining, energy, and corridor-linked supply chains.

Flag

CBAM and green compliance pressure

EU officials explicitly linked deeper trade integration to climate alignment, warning Turkish exporters about Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism exposure without compatible carbon pricing and reporting. Carbon-cost pass-through could hit steel, cement, aluminum and chemicals, driving urgent decarbonization and MRV investments.

Flag

Talent constraints and foreign hiring policy

Labor shortages in manufacturing and high-tech intensify competition for engineers and skilled technicians. Policy tweaks to attract foreign talent and expand foreign-worker quotas can help, but firms should plan for wage pressure, retention costs, and slower ramp-ups for new capacity.

Flag

Anti-corruption tightening and governance

A new Party resolution on anti-corruption and “wastefulness” is set to intensify prevention, post-audit controls, and enforcement in high-risk sectors. This can reduce informal costs over time, yet heightens near-term compliance risk, procurement scrutiny, and potential project delays during investigations.

Flag

Aid conditionality and fiscal dependence

Ukraine’s budget is heavily war-driven (KSE: 2025 spending US$131.4bn; 71% defence/security; US$39.2bn deficit) and relies on partner financing. EU approved a €90bn loan for 2026–27 and an IMF $8.1bn program is pending, but disbursements hinge on reforms and compliance.

Flag

PIF strategy reset and PPPs

The Public Investment Fund is revising its 2026–2030 strategy and Saudi launched a privatization push targeting 220+ PPP contracts by 2030 and ~$64bn capex. Creates bankable infrastructure deals, but raises tender competitiveness, localization requirements, and governance diligence needs.

Flag

Digital sovereignty and data controls

Russia is tightening internet and data-localisation rules, throttling Telegram and moving to block WhatsApp while promoting state-backed ‘Max’. From 1 Jan 2026, services must retain messages for three years and share on request, raising surveillance, cybersecurity, and operational continuity risks for firms.

Flag

Cyber and physical security exposure

Critical infrastructure targeting increases cyber and sabotage risks for telecoms, utilities, ports and industrial firms. Businesses should expect greater downtime probability, stricter security protocols, and higher compliance costs for data, critical equipment, and dual-use supply chains.

Flag

Secondary Iran trade penalties

An executive order authorizes ~25% additional tariffs on imports from countries trading with Iran, effectively extending secondary sanctions through border measures. Multinationals must intensify supply-chain and customer screening, reassess third-country exposure, and anticipate retaliation and compliance costs.

Flag

Disinflation Path and Rates

The CBRT and IMF signal continued disinflation but still-high prices: inflation fell from 49.4% (Sep 2024) to 30.9% (Dec 2025), with end‑2026 seen near ~23%. Policy-rate cuts remain gradual, shaping demand, credit, and business financing costs.

Flag

China demand concentration drives volatility

China remains Brazil’s dominant trade partner: January exports to China rose 17.4% to US$6.47bn, and China takes about 72% of Brazilian iron ore exports. Commodity price swings and Chinese demand shifts directly affect revenues, shipping flows, and investment planning.

Flag

Geoeconomic diversification toward Gulf

Berlin is accelerating diversification of energy and strategic inputs, courting Qatar/Saudi/UAE for LNG and green ammonia. LNG was ~10% of German gas imports in 2025, ~96% from the US, raising concentration risk. New corridors affect contracting and infrastructure plans.

Flag

Strategic ports and infrastructure sovereignty

Moves to return the Port of Darwin to Australian control highlight rising “sovereignty screening” over logistics assets. Investors in ports, airports, energy and telecoms should expect tougher national-interest tests, deal delays, and possible renegotiation or compensation disputes impacting valuations.

Flag

Internet shutdowns and digital controls

Near-total internet blackouts and tighter censorship have cut businesses off from customers, suppliers, and payments, with reported losses from millions to tens of millions of dollars per day. Expect unreliable connectivity, mandatory use of domestic platforms, and elevated cybersecurity exposure.

Flag

Red Sea–Suez shipping volatility

Red Sea security disruptions continue to reroute vessels, weakening Suez Canal throughput and foreign-currency inflows. While recent data show partial recovery (FY2025/26 H1 revenues +18.5%), insurers, transit times, and freight rates remain unstable, affecting Egypt-linked logistics and pricing.

Flag

Seguridad: robo de carga y extorsión

El robo a transporte de carga superó MXN 7 mil millones en pérdidas en 2025; rutas clave (México‑Querétaro, Córdoba‑Puebla) concentran incidentes y se usan inhibidores (“jammers”). Eleva costos de seguros, inventario y escoltas, y obliga a rediseñar rutas y SLAs.

Flag

Electricity market reform uncertainty

Eskom restructuring and the Electricity Regulation Amendment rollout are pivotal for stable power and competitive pricing. Debate over a truly independent transmission entity risks delaying grid expansion; 14,000km of new lines need about R440bn, affecting project timelines and energy-intensive operations.

Flag

Ports and rail logistics bottlenecks

Transnet’s recovery is uneven: rail volumes are improving, but vandalism and underinvestment keep capacity fragile. Port congestion—such as Cape Town’s fruit-export backlog near R1bn—threatens time-sensitive shipments, raises demurrage, and pushes costly rerouting across supply chains.

Flag

Won volatility and FX buffers

Authorities issued $3bn in FX stabilization bonds as reserves fell to about $425.9bn end‑January, signaling concern about won pressures amid global rates and capital outflows. Importers/exporters should tighten hedging, review pricing clauses, and monitor liquidity conditions.

Flag

Border crossings and movement controls

The limited reopening of Rafah for people—under Israeli security clearance and EU supervision—highlights how border-regime shifts can quickly change labor mobility, humanitarian flows and regional political risk. Businesses should expect sudden permitting changes affecting contractors, travel and project timelines.

Flag

Tariff volatility as negotiation tool

The administration is using tariff threats—up to 100% on Canadian goods and shifting rates for key partners—as leverage in broader negotiations. This raises landed-cost uncertainty, complicates pricing and contracting, and incentivizes nearshoring, dual sourcing, and inventory buffers for import-dependent firms.

Flag

Critical minerals bloc reshaping rules

The U.S. is pushing a preferential critical-minerals trade zone with price floors, reference pricing, and stockpiling (Project Vault), amid China’s dominant refining share. Canada is engaged but not always aligned, affecting mining investment, offtake deals, and EV/defence supply chains.

Flag

Digital regulation and platform compliance risk

Proposed online-platform and network rules, plus high-profile cases involving major platforms, are viewed in Washington as discriminatory. Potential policy shifts could alter data governance, content delivery costs, and competition enforcement, influencing market entry strategy and compliance budgets for multinationals.