Mission Grey Daily Brief - October 26, 2024
Summary of the Global Situation for Businesses and Investors
The war in Ukraine continues to dominate global affairs, with North Korean troops moving towards the frontline and Russian forces suffering record casualty rates. Elon Musk is accused of having close ties with Vladimir Putin, withholding Starlink access from Taiwan as a favour to China. US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announced new sanctions targeting secondary entities in countries supplying Russia with critical items for its military. Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko threatened war if Russia attempts to annex Belarus. South Korea is threatening to arm Ukraine in response to North Korea's support for Russia. Putin hosted the BRICS summit in Russia, praising its role as a counterbalance to the West's "perverse methods", and pushing for the creation of a new payment system as an alternative to the SWIFT network. Israel launched a retaliatory strike on Iran.
Russia's War in Ukraine
The war in Ukraine continues to be a major concern for businesses and investors, with the conflict entering its 975th day and Russian forces suffering record casualty rates. North Korean troops are moving towards the frontline, posing a significant threat to Ukraine's defence. Vladimir Putin is pulling Kim Jong Un deeper into the war, revealing a weakness in the Kremlin's ability to recruit troops at home. North Korea's infusion of fresh soldiers will remain practically risk-free for Pyongyang, unless the United States returns to its aggressive sanctions posture against the Kim regime. Russia is no stranger to employing foreign armies, with Cossack warriors famously fighting for the tsars in centuries past and the Red Army bolstering its ranks with Mongolian troops when it invaded China at the end of World War II. Today, the "TikTok soldiers" of Chechen warlord Ramzan Kadyrov are scattered across Ukraine's front lines.
After nearly three years of fighting, Putin is running low on cannon fodder. The Kremlin is finding it difficult and expensive to entice more of Russia's poor and desperate to sign up for the war, even with promises of bonuses and good pay. In theory, Moscow could force millions of its fighting-age men into the Ukrainian meat grinder through conscription, but this option is politically perilous. The Putin regime discovered the dangers of the draft when it briefly attempted a "partial mobilization" in September 2022, with Russians responding with howls of opposition. The government quickly backed off of the effort, informing many that their call-up orders were issued by "mistake". Since then, Russia has relied on mercenary groups and lucrative payouts to make the "golden handshake" in exchange for military service in Ukraine. Even these enticements are proving to be insufficient for the Kremlin's manpower needs.
By providing fresh troops to Russia, North Korea will likely help to backfill some, but not all, of Moscow's gaps. US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin warned the news is a "very, very serious issue", but cautioned that the precise contribution of Pyongyang's troops remained unknown. For the Kim regime, support for Russia has many strategic benefits and few risks. First, protection from United Nations sanctions. Russia has used its Security Council veto to repeatedly shield North Korea from international monitoring and penalties for its prohibited missile tests and nuclear weapons development. Second, a security guarantee from the world's largest nuclear power. This summer, Moscow and Pyongyang agreed to a NATO-style mutual defense pledge, promising to aid each other in the event of war. Third, North Korea's troops will gain valuable combat experience if they survive. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the Kim regime will likely benefit from Russian technology transfers that could greatly accelerate its missile and nuclear programs.
In exchange, the costs to North Korea are a pittance. An expeditionary force of roughly 12,000 soldiers is small potatoes compared to Kim's million-man army. His related shipments of around three million artillery shells to Russia is also a small fraction of his total stockpile. The danger to Ukraine is great, however, with a senior Ukrainian official stating that the addition of North Korean artillery on the battlefield has been "much worse than the Shaheds", the Iranian-designed kamikaze drones that Russia is using to pound Kyiv's troops and infrastructure.
Elon Musk's Alleged Ties with Vladimir Putin
Elon Musk is accused of having close ties with Vladimir Putin, withholding Starlink access from Taiwan as a favour to China. The Wall Street Journal reported that Putin asked Musk to withhold Starlink from Taiwan as a favour to China's Xi Jinping, with unnamed officials stating that Musk has been in regular contact with Putin since 2022. The Journal reported that in late 2023, Musk received his first request from the Kremlin to refrain from activating Starlink over Taiwan, citing a former Russian intelligence officer. The request was made for Beijing's sake, as Moscow increasingly relied on trade from China. Based on The Journal's findings, it's unclear exactly how many times Putin or his administration asked Musk for the favour.
The Chinese embassy in Washington told The Journal that it was not aware of the specifics of this arrangement, and did not respond to a separate request for comment sent outside regular business hours by Business Insider. Taiwan does not have official Starlink access because its laws require satellite services to be provided through a joint venture with a local operator that maintains majority ownership. The New York Times reported that SpaceX was unwilling to accept such an arrangement, and the self-governed island is thus creating its own low-earth orbit satellite network. Musk's reported conversations with Putin coincide with his apparent shift in rhetoric toward Ukraine in late 2022. Until that point, the billionaire had vocally supported Kyiv, providing it with 15,000 Starlink terminals.
In October of that year, he began seeking funding from the Pentagon to continue the free services, tweeting that they were taking a financial toll. Musk also tweeted a poll that month about a peace plan reflecting some of Russia's war demands at the time, including Russia's formal obtaining of Crimea and a guarantee of Ukraine's neutrality. The billionaire's post drew the fury of pro-Ukrainian accounts, but he added that he only suggested those measures to avoid further death in Ukraine and the risk of nuclear war. "Obviously, we are pro-Ukraine", he tweeted, saying that SpaceX had spent about $80 million on free Starlink for Ukraine. Two weeks later, Ian Bremmer, a political scientist who founded Eurasia Group, wrote in an email to his subscribers that Musk had spoken with Putin before tweeting this controversial peace plan. Per Bremmer, Putin had told Musk that if he could not accomplish his goals in Ukraine, he would turn to "major escalation". Musk and the Kremlin said Bremmer's report was untrue.
The allegations present awkward implications for the US, with Musk's SpaceX holding defense and space contracts with the Pentagon and NASA. An analysis published on Monday by The New York Times reported that the company has $3.6 billion in contracts with the Defense Department — primarily for launching American satellites into orbit — and $11.8 billion with NASA. Russian forces were reported to be buying up Starlink terminals earlier this year to help their invasion of Ukraine. The system has been vital to Ukrainian forces over the two-year conflict. But Russian agents are reportedly now using 'intermediaries' in Dubai in order to get their hands on the terminals, circumventing western sanctions imposed on Russia. House Democrats warned that Russia's use of the system in Ukraine could raise national security concerns in March. In a letter to SpaceX, two Democrats on the House Oversight Committee demanded information about Russia's potential illegal acquisition of the satellite-enabled terminals, according to the Washington Post. The letter cited recent allegations from Ukrainian intelligence officials, who say that Russian troops are using Starlink terminals to coordinate war efforts in eastern Ukraine, in potential violation of US sanctions.
As founder of SpaceX, Musk has cultivated close ties with US military and intelligence, with access to sensitive information. The company is the primary rocket launcher for both NASA and the Pentagon. Starlink has said it does not do any business in or with Russia, and Musk has branded claims of association with Putin "absurd". Dmitry Peskov, spokesperson for the Kremlin, insisted neither Putin nor the Kremlin were in regular contact with Musk. Musk has not yet commented on the claims published in the WSJ. The Kremlin today slammed the claims in the WSJ report as "not true" and "absolutely false". While Beijing remains officially neutral on the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, it has supported Putin's claims that the war was provoked by western aggression. The US this month imposed its first sanctions on Chinese firms for making weapons for Russia, accusing them of collaborating with Russian defence firms to produce drones vital to the war effort.
US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen Announces New Sanctions
US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announced new sanctions targeting secondary entities in countries supplying Russia with critical items for its military. Yellen told world financial leaders gathered in Washington for annual meetings of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank that "We will unveil strong new sanctions targeting those facilitating the Kremlin's war machine, including intermediaries in third countries that are supplying Russia with critical inputs for its military". The IMF and World Bank meetings mark the last major international finance gathering to be held during President Joe Biden's administration and come as the state of the economy and inflation are top concerns for American voters. The presidential election between the Republican party nominee, former President Donald Trump, and Democratic party nominee Vice President Kamala Harris is slated to be decided on November 5, with the outcome expected to have an enormous impact on global finance and the world's economy.
Yellen touched on the use of the proceeds from frozen Russian sovereign assets to provide loans for Ukraine. As she spoke, the European Parliament approved a loan of up to 35 billion euros ($38 billion) for Ukraine's defense and reconstruction that will be repaid using future revenues from Russian central bank assets frozen abroad. Yellen referred to the overall $50 billion loan package being negotiated by the Group of Seven and EU allies, saying the United States expects to be able to contribute $20 billion. The U.S. Treasury Department is "working tirelessly to unlock the economic value of frozen Russian sovereign assets to aid Ukraine", Yellen said. Earlier on October 22, Britain announced its readiness to provide Ukraine with a loan of<co: 2>Earlier on October 22, Britain announced its readiness to provide Ukraine with a loan of
Further Reading:
As North Korea, Iran and China support Russia’s war, is a ‘new axis’ emerging? - CNN
If South Korea decides to get involved in Ukraine, it has powerful options - Business Insider
Israel launches retaliatory strike on Iran - Financial Times
Lukashenko warns of war if Russia attempts to annex Belarus - RBC-Ukraine
North Korea’s troops reveal Putin’s Ukraine pickle — no more cannon fodder - New York Post
Putin 'asked Elon Musk to switch off internet over Taiwan as a favour to China' - Daily Mail
Vance says it is Ukraine's decision to end the war - NBC News
Vladimir Putin signals North Korean troops are in Russia - Financial Times
Themes around the World:
Shadow Fleet Trade Rewiring
Russia continues relying on a shadow tanker fleet now estimated at roughly 600-800 vessels to bypass price-cap restrictions and preserve hydrocarbon exports. This sustains trade flows but raises shipping, insurance, sanctions-enforcement and environmental risks for firms exposed to opaque maritime networks.
Industrial Policy Shifts Regional Competition
South Africa retains strong industrial depth, but competitiveness pressures are visible. Nissan redirected a $45 million manufacturing expansion to Egypt, citing lower costs and better export positioning, while South Africa pushes EV incentives and regional financing to sustain automotive and processing investment.
Fiscal Stability Masks Constraints
Moody’s upgraded Thailand’s outlook to stable and affirmed Baa1, citing easing tariff risks, recovering private investment and improved political conditions. Yet rising public debt, possible additional borrowing of THB500 billion and weak long-term growth still constrain the medium-term business environment.
Foreign Investment Screening Stays Tight
Despite closer US economic coordination, Taiwan is maintaining legal restrictions on foreign investment in sensitive sectors including power, telecoms, minerals, and infrastructure. This preserves national security controls, but may slow deal execution, require deeper regulatory diligence, and limit access in strategic industries.
Trade Diversification from China
Taiwan is reducing dependence on China as exports to China fell from 40.1% in 2016 to 26.6% in 2025, while outbound investment to China and Hong Kong dropped from 83.8% in 2010 to 4.69% in 2025, reshaping supply-chain geography.
Critical Minerals Supply Vulnerability
China is reinforcing leverage over rare earths and related materials essential for autos, aerospace, electronics, and defense. Prior controls reportedly caused U.S. auto shortages within weeks, underscoring how mineral licensing and export restrictions can quickly disrupt global manufacturing and pricing.
Supply Chain Exposure to External Shocks
Recent disruption around Hormuz highlighted France’s continued vulnerability to imported energy and globally sourced components. Even with domestic production ambitions, firms reliant on Asian inputs or Gulf-linked shipping routes face elevated logistics risk, inventory challenges, and pressure to diversify sourcing.
Investment Momentum Broadens Geographically
Total FDI reached $88.29 billion in April-February 2025-26, with net FDI rising to $6.26 billion and officials expecting about $90 billion for the full year. Grounded projects across 14 states signal expanding industrial opportunities, especially in chemicals, pharma, electronics, and auto-EV.
Alliance Frictions Reshape Strategy
US-South Korea tensions over tariffs, burden-sharing, and Middle East cooperation are pushing the relationship toward a more transactional footing. Companies should expect policy unpredictability around market access, troop-cost politics, industrial commitments, and cross-border investment negotiations affecting long-term planning.
Rising Business Tax Burden
Higher employer National Insurance, elevated business rates and broader tax increases are squeezing margins and slowing expansion. Employer NIC bills rose by £28 billion, while 32% of firms reported cancelling, delaying or reducing property investment because of business rates.
China Re-engagement and Security Risks
Canada’s renewed commercial opening to China, including access for 49,000 Chinese EVs in exchange for lower Chinese tariffs on canola and seafood, creates opportunities but raises major strategic concerns around forced labour exposure, data security, local manufacturing competitiveness and U.S. political backlash.
Trade Routes Depend on Wartime Logistics
Ukraine’s trade flows remain highly sensitive to wartime transport constraints, damaged infrastructure, and regional transit politics. Businesses reliant on agricultural, industrial, or imported inputs should expect elevated freight costs, rerouting needs, longer lead times, and persistent uncertainty across multimodal supply chains.
USMCA Review and Tariff Uncertainty
Canada faces acute uncertainty ahead of the July USMCA review as Washington keeps 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum and pressures Ottawa for concessions. The prolonged negotiation cycle is disrupting investment planning, cross-border sourcing, and North American production decisions.
CUSMA Review and Tariff Uncertainty
Canada faces elevated trade uncertainty as CUSMA review talks slip past July 1 and U.S. Section 232 tariffs remain on steel, aluminum, autos and lumber. Prolonged negotiations risk delaying investment, disrupting cross-border sourcing, and complicating North American market planning.
Fuel And Industrial Shortages
Energy disruption is constraining domestic industry, with reported gasoline deficits reaching 77 million liters daily under war conditions and refinery stress worsening shortages. Businesses face heightened risk of electricity curbs, fuel scarcity, factory stoppages, transport disruption, and delayed local procurement.
Energy Shock and Cost Inflation
Oil-market disruption tied to Middle East tensions has pushed French fuel inflation sharply higher, with fuel prices up 14.2% and diesel averaging above €2.20 per liter. Higher transport, aviation, and industrial input costs threaten margins, pricing, and consumer demand.
China Content Compliance Scrutiny
North American supply chains face heavier scrutiny over Chinese inputs and transshipment through Mexico. Altana estimates about US$300 billion in tariffed goods are rerouted annually, while suspicious transactions rose 76% in early 2025, increasing audit, customs, and reputational exposure for manufacturers.
Auto Sector Competitiveness Squeezed
Mexico’s auto industry is under acute pressure from a 25% U.S. tariff, while Japan, the EU and South Korea face 15% and Britain 10%. Vehicle exports to the United States fell nearly 3% in 2025, and roughly 60,000 auto jobs were lost.
US-China Tech Controls Escalate
The United States is tightening technology restrictions on China through export controls, chip-equipment legislation, and shifting licensing rules, while Beijing weighs countermeasures in semiconductors, solar equipment, and critical minerals. Multinationals face rising compliance burdens, supplier concentration risks, and potential disruption across electronics, energy, and advanced manufacturing.
Digital Trade Regulation Friction
The US has intensified criticism of Korea’s proposed network usage fee regime, calling it a trade barrier and possible Section 301 issue. The dispute could affect telecom, streaming, cloud and platform operators through higher compliance burdens and bilateral trade friction.
IMF-Driven Reform Conditionality
Pakistan’s May 8 IMF board review and expected $1.21 billion disbursement anchor macro stability, but 11 new conditions add compliance pressure through tax, procurement, energy pricing, SEZ and foreign-exchange reforms, reshaping investment assumptions and operating costs for foreign businesses.
Labor Tightness Constrains Operations
Immigration restrictions and enforcement are shrinking labor supply in hospitality, agriculture, logistics, and construction-adjacent roles. Employers report over 900,000 vacant restaurant and hotel jobs, raising wage pressure, slowing expansion, and increasing automation incentives across labor-intensive business models.
Ports and Transit Gain Importance
Karachi Port is benefiting from transshipment shifts, dredging upgrades and lower charges, with officials saying 99% of transshipment issues were resolved within 40 days. Improved maritime throughput may support trade competitiveness, though gains depend on sustained regional stability and execution.
South China Sea shipping tensions
Renewed friction in the South China Sea, including tighter Chinese control around disputed shoals, increases operational risk for maritime trade. Even without major conflict, insurers, shippers, and investors face elevated contingency costs, route uncertainty, and geopolitical risk premiums.
Oil Route And Price Risk
Saudi crude exports rose to 7.276 million bpd in February and output to 10.882 million bpd, yet Strait of Hormuz disruption and regional conflict are increasing freight, insurance and contingency-planning costs for energy buyers, shippers and manufacturers dependent on Gulf flows.
Middle East Energy Shock
Higher oil prices and possible Strait of Hormuz disruption are raising import costs, inflation, and logistics risk. April inflation was seen accelerating to 2.6%, while import growth reached 16.7%, exposing energy-intensive manufacturers and transport-dependent supply chains to external shocks.
Escalating Sanctions and Enforcement
US sanctions enforcement is tightening sharply across shipping, energy, banking, and intermediaries. Since February 2025, OFAC says it has targeted about 1,000 Iran-linked entities, vessels, and aircraft, materially raising secondary-sanctions exposure for foreign firms, banks, insurers, and traders.
USMCA Review and Tariff Risk
Canada’s July USMCA review is drifting beyond deadline as Ottawa links renewal to relief from U.S. Section 232 tariffs on steel, aluminum, autos, lumber, and derivative goods. Prolonged uncertainty is delaying investment, raising cross-border costs, and disrupting integrated North American supply chains.
Fragile Reindustrialization Push
France’s industrial revival is real but uneven: official policy backs €54 billion under France 2030 and 150 strategic projects worth €71 billion, yet 2025 still saw 124 threatened factory closures against 86 openings. Investors face opportunity in strategic sectors but execution risk elsewhere.
Danantara Drives Industrial Policy
Indonesia is using Danantara to steer large downstream and energy investments, including Rp116 trillion in new projects and a proposed US$30 billion Singapore-linked renewables partnership. The opportunity is substantial, but governance concerns flagged by Fitch could affect sovereign sentiment, partnerships, and project bankability.
Export Controls Reshape Tech Supply
US export controls on semiconductors and chipmaking equipment remain central to industrial policy and national security. Tighter rules, possible allied alignment and servicing restrictions risk fragmenting electronics supply chains, limiting market access and forcing multinationals to separate technology, customers and production footprints.
Nuclear Talks Shape Business Outlook
Diplomatic negotiations over sanctions relief, uranium limits and maritime access remain a major swing factor for Iran’s business environment. Any breakthrough could improve trade conditions and asset values, while failure would prolong restrictions, policy volatility and geopolitical risk exposure.
Semiconductor Reshoring Accelerates Unevenly
The United States is expanding domestic chip fabrication through subsidies, state backing, and strategic investments, but packaging, testing, and supplier ecosystems remain concentrated in Asia. High US construction and labor costs, workforce shortages, and missing back-end capacity limit full supply-chain security and raise execution risk.
Tariff and Trade Friction Exposure
Japanese firms remain exposed to lingering U.S. tariff effects and broader trade-policy uncertainty, even as some adapt through cost pass-through and production shifts. Exporters face margin pressure, supply-chain reconfiguration, and more complex market-entry decisions, particularly in autos and industrial goods.
Oil Export Resilience Under Pressure
Russia’s seaborne crude exports recovered to 3.52 million barrels per day on a four-week basis, with weekly flows at 3.79 million. Revenues remain substantial, but logistics depend on fragile shadow-fleet arrangements, waivers and ports vulnerable to Ukrainian strikes and policy tightening.
Supply Chains Shift Toward Mexico
Tariff volatility is accelerating nearshoring into Mexico and wider North America. Logistics providers report more cross-border freight, diversified ports, bonded facilities, and modular networks, meaning companies must redesign inventory, routing, and distribution footprints rather than wait for policy clarity.