Return to Homepage
Image

Mission Grey Daily Brief - October 26, 2024

Summary of the Global Situation for Businesses and Investors

The war in Ukraine continues to dominate global affairs, with North Korean troops moving towards the frontline and Russian forces suffering record casualty rates. Elon Musk is accused of having close ties with Vladimir Putin, withholding Starlink access from Taiwan as a favour to China. US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announced new sanctions targeting secondary entities in countries supplying Russia with critical items for its military. Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko threatened war if Russia attempts to annex Belarus. South Korea is threatening to arm Ukraine in response to North Korea's support for Russia. Putin hosted the BRICS summit in Russia, praising its role as a counterbalance to the West's "perverse methods", and pushing for the creation of a new payment system as an alternative to the SWIFT network. Israel launched a retaliatory strike on Iran.

Russia's War in Ukraine

The war in Ukraine continues to be a major concern for businesses and investors, with the conflict entering its 975th day and Russian forces suffering record casualty rates. North Korean troops are moving towards the frontline, posing a significant threat to Ukraine's defence. Vladimir Putin is pulling Kim Jong Un deeper into the war, revealing a weakness in the Kremlin's ability to recruit troops at home. North Korea's infusion of fresh soldiers will remain practically risk-free for Pyongyang, unless the United States returns to its aggressive sanctions posture against the Kim regime. Russia is no stranger to employing foreign armies, with Cossack warriors famously fighting for the tsars in centuries past and the Red Army bolstering its ranks with Mongolian troops when it invaded China at the end of World War II. Today, the "TikTok soldiers" of Chechen warlord Ramzan Kadyrov are scattered across Ukraine's front lines.

After nearly three years of fighting, Putin is running low on cannon fodder. The Kremlin is finding it difficult and expensive to entice more of Russia's poor and desperate to sign up for the war, even with promises of bonuses and good pay. In theory, Moscow could force millions of its fighting-age men into the Ukrainian meat grinder through conscription, but this option is politically perilous. The Putin regime discovered the dangers of the draft when it briefly attempted a "partial mobilization" in September 2022, with Russians responding with howls of opposition. The government quickly backed off of the effort, informing many that their call-up orders were issued by "mistake". Since then, Russia has relied on mercenary groups and lucrative payouts to make the "golden handshake" in exchange for military service in Ukraine. Even these enticements are proving to be insufficient for the Kremlin's manpower needs.

By providing fresh troops to Russia, North Korea will likely help to backfill some, but not all, of Moscow's gaps. US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin warned the news is a "very, very serious issue", but cautioned that the precise contribution of Pyongyang's troops remained unknown. For the Kim regime, support for Russia has many strategic benefits and few risks. First, protection from United Nations sanctions. Russia has used its Security Council veto to repeatedly shield North Korea from international monitoring and penalties for its prohibited missile tests and nuclear weapons development. Second, a security guarantee from the world's largest nuclear power. This summer, Moscow and Pyongyang agreed to a NATO-style mutual defense pledge, promising to aid each other in the event of war. Third, North Korea's troops will gain valuable combat experience if they survive. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the Kim regime will likely benefit from Russian technology transfers that could greatly accelerate its missile and nuclear programs.

In exchange, the costs to North Korea are a pittance. An expeditionary force of roughly 12,000 soldiers is small potatoes compared to Kim's million-man army. His related shipments of around three million artillery shells to Russia is also a small fraction of his total stockpile. The danger to Ukraine is great, however, with a senior Ukrainian official stating that the addition of North Korean artillery on the battlefield has been "much worse than the Shaheds", the Iranian-designed kamikaze drones that Russia is using to pound Kyiv's troops and infrastructure.

Elon Musk's Alleged Ties with Vladimir Putin

Elon Musk is accused of having close ties with Vladimir Putin, withholding Starlink access from Taiwan as a favour to China. The Wall Street Journal reported that Putin asked Musk to withhold Starlink from Taiwan as a favour to China's Xi Jinping, with unnamed officials stating that Musk has been in regular contact with Putin since 2022. The Journal reported that in late 2023, Musk received his first request from the Kremlin to refrain from activating Starlink over Taiwan, citing a former Russian intelligence officer. The request was made for Beijing's sake, as Moscow increasingly relied on trade from China. Based on The Journal's findings, it's unclear exactly how many times Putin or his administration asked Musk for the favour.

The Chinese embassy in Washington told The Journal that it was not aware of the specifics of this arrangement, and did not respond to a separate request for comment sent outside regular business hours by Business Insider. Taiwan does not have official Starlink access because its laws require satellite services to be provided through a joint venture with a local operator that maintains majority ownership. The New York Times reported that SpaceX was unwilling to accept such an arrangement, and the self-governed island is thus creating its own low-earth orbit satellite network. Musk's reported conversations with Putin coincide with his apparent shift in rhetoric toward Ukraine in late 2022. Until that point, the billionaire had vocally supported Kyiv, providing it with 15,000 Starlink terminals.

In October of that year, he began seeking funding from the Pentagon to continue the free services, tweeting that they were taking a financial toll. Musk also tweeted a poll that month about a peace plan reflecting some of Russia's war demands at the time, including Russia's formal obtaining of Crimea and a guarantee of Ukraine's neutrality. The billionaire's post drew the fury of pro-Ukrainian accounts, but he added that he only suggested those measures to avoid further death in Ukraine and the risk of nuclear war. "Obviously, we are pro-Ukraine", he tweeted, saying that SpaceX had spent about $80 million on free Starlink for Ukraine. Two weeks later, Ian Bremmer, a political scientist who founded Eurasia Group, wrote in an email to his subscribers that Musk had spoken with Putin before tweeting this controversial peace plan. Per Bremmer, Putin had told Musk that if he could not accomplish his goals in Ukraine, he would turn to "major escalation". Musk and the Kremlin said Bremmer's report was untrue.

The allegations present awkward implications for the US, with Musk's SpaceX holding defense and space contracts with the Pentagon and NASA. An analysis published on Monday by The New York Times reported that the company has $3.6 billion in contracts with the Defense Department — primarily for launching American satellites into orbit — and $11.8 billion with NASA. Russian forces were reported to be buying up Starlink terminals earlier this year to help their invasion of Ukraine. The system has been vital to Ukrainian forces over the two-year conflict. But Russian agents are reportedly now using 'intermediaries' in Dubai in order to get their hands on the terminals, circumventing western sanctions imposed on Russia. House Democrats warned that Russia's use of the system in Ukraine could raise national security concerns in March. In a letter to SpaceX, two Democrats on the House Oversight Committee demanded information about Russia's potential illegal acquisition of the satellite-enabled terminals, according to the Washington Post. The letter cited recent allegations from Ukrainian intelligence officials, who say that Russian troops are using Starlink terminals to coordinate war efforts in eastern Ukraine, in potential violation of US sanctions.

As founder of SpaceX, Musk has cultivated close ties with US military and intelligence, with access to sensitive information. The company is the primary rocket launcher for both NASA and the Pentagon. Starlink has said it does not do any business in or with Russia, and Musk has branded claims of association with Putin "absurd". Dmitry Peskov, spokesperson for the Kremlin, insisted neither Putin nor the Kremlin were in regular contact with Musk. Musk has not yet commented on the claims published in the WSJ. The Kremlin today slammed the claims in the WSJ report as "not true" and "absolutely false". While Beijing remains officially neutral on the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, it has supported Putin's claims that the war was provoked by western aggression. The US this month imposed its first sanctions on Chinese firms for making weapons for Russia, accusing them of collaborating with Russian defence firms to produce drones vital to the war effort.

US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen Announces New Sanctions

US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announced new sanctions targeting secondary entities in countries supplying Russia with critical items for its military. Yellen told world financial leaders gathered in Washington for annual meetings of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank that "We will unveil strong new sanctions targeting those facilitating the Kremlin's war machine, including intermediaries in third countries that are supplying Russia with critical inputs for its military". The IMF and World Bank meetings mark the last major international finance gathering to be held during President Joe Biden's administration and come as the state of the economy and inflation are top concerns for American voters. The presidential election between the Republican party nominee, former President Donald Trump, and Democratic party nominee Vice President Kamala Harris is slated to be decided on November 5, with the outcome expected to have an enormous impact on global finance and the world's economy.

Yellen touched on the use of the proceeds from frozen Russian sovereign assets to provide loans for Ukraine. As she spoke, the European Parliament approved a loan of up to 35 billion euros ($38 billion) for Ukraine's defense and reconstruction that will be repaid using future revenues from Russian central bank assets frozen abroad. Yellen referred to the overall $50 billion loan package being negotiated by the Group of Seven and EU allies, saying the United States expects to be able to contribute $20 billion. The U.S. Treasury Department is "working tirelessly to unlock the economic value of frozen Russian sovereign assets to aid Ukraine", Yellen said. Earlier on October 22, Britain announced its readiness to provide Ukraine with a loan of<co: 2>Earlier on October 22, Britain announced its readiness to provide Ukraine with a loan of


Further Reading:

As North Korea, Iran and China support Russia’s war, is a ‘new axis’ emerging? - CNN

If South Korea decides to get involved in Ukraine, it has powerful options - Business Insider

Israel launches retaliatory strike on Iran - Financial Times

Lukashenko warns of war if Russia attempts to annex Belarus - RBC-Ukraine

MEPs Denounce Azerbaijan's Rights Violations Ahead Of Key Conference - Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty

North Korea’s troops reveal Putin’s Ukraine pickle — no more cannon fodder - New York Post

Putin 'asked Elon Musk to switch off internet over Taiwan as a favour to China' - Daily Mail

Putin hosts growing BRICS alliance in Russia, touting it as an alternative to the West's "perverse methods" - CBS News

Putin once asked Elon Musk to not activate Starlink over Taiwan as a favor to Xi Jinping: report - Business Insider

Russo-Ukrainian War, day 975: Russian forces suffer record casualty rates as North Korean troops move towards the frontline - Euromaidan Press

Ukraine calls on North Korean soldiers to surrender and promises safety, food and medical care - Euronews

Vance says it is Ukraine's decision to end the war - NBC News

Vladimir Putin signals North Korean troops are in Russia - Financial Times

Themes around the World:

Flag

Macro volatility: rand, rates, oil shock

External shocks quickly transmit via the rand and fuel prices. Middle East disruption pushed Brent above $100 and triggered sharp bond selloffs; markets now price possible SARB hikes. Higher diesel/petrol costs raise economy-wide logistics and input expenses, pressuring margins.

Flag

Currency management and liquidity pressures

The NBU continues heavy FX interventions and managed exchange-rate flexibility; reserves remain high but fluctuate with debt service and interventions. Companies face conversion timing risk, payment planning complexity, and potential regulatory adjustments affecting capital repatriation and hedging.

Flag

Middle East war disrupts logistics

Iran war effects include Strait of Hormuz disruption and heightened war-risk insurance, while Turkey–Iran border day-trip crossings were suspended. Shipping delays, higher freight premiums, and rerouting pressure supply chains; Turkey may benefit as an alternative Eurasian logistics hub.

Flag

Trade Policy Drives Market Volatility

US trade actions are increasingly tied to domestic fiscal, industrial, and geopolitical goals rather than narrow sector protection. That broadens exposure for international firms, as tariffs, forced-labor rules, and export restrictions can change quickly and reshape investment returns, supplier geography, and negotiation leverage.

Flag

Hormuz closure and mining threat

Tehran signals maritime escalation—temporary Strait of Hormuz closures in drills and credible mining/harassment options—to raise global energy prices and pressure Washington. Any sustained disruption hits ~20% of global oil flows, spiking freight, insurance, and supply-chain costs.

Flag

Cross-strait conflict and blockade risk

Elevated China–Taiwan tensions keep tail-risk of air/sea disruption high, affecting Taipei/Kaohsiung throughput, insurance premiums, and just-in-time electronics supply. Firms should harden contingency routing, inventory buffers, and crisis communications, especially for semiconductor-dependent products.

Flag

Internet shutdown and operational continuity

Authorities imposed a near-total nationwide internet blackout lasting weeks per connectivity monitors, disrupting communications, cloud access, and digital payments. Multinationals face heightened business-continuity risk: degraded customer support, remote management constraints, and compliance challenges for reporting and security controls.

Flag

Indo-Pacific security industrial integration

Defence cooperation with close partners is expanding toward industrial co-production and faster movement of equipment and personnel. This supports secure supply chains for advanced manufacturing and dual-use technology, but raises compliance demands around export controls, cyber security, and partner vetting.

Flag

Maritime chokepoint and freight shocks

Israel-linked conflict raises risk across Bab el-Mandeb/Suez and Hormuz. Major carriers reroute via Cape of Good Hope, adding 10–14 days and imposing surcharges (e.g., CMA CGM US$2,000/TEU; Hapag-Lloyd US$1,500/TEU), tightening capacity and raising landed costs for importers/exporters.

Flag

Defense spending and fiscal drift

Conflict-related outlays are likely to widen Israel’s fiscal deficit and reshape procurement priorities. JPMorgan estimates 2026 deficit rising to ~4.2% of GDP (about 9bn shekels extra). Expect increased defense/dual-use demand, potential tax adjustments, and budget reprioritization.

Flag

High energy costs, grid delays

Industrial electricity costs remain a competitiveness constraint as wind and grid build‑out lags targets; system-security measures cost about €3bn in 2024. Debates over cutting electricity tax and higher ETS II CO₂ pricing raise operating-cost and investment uncertainty.

Flag

Sanctions and shipping compliance intensity

UK enforcement focus remains high around Russia-related trade and maritime activity, illustrated by ongoing scrutiny of ‘shadow fleet’ facilitation even as some designations are revisited. Financial institutions, insurers, shipowners and commodity traders face elevated KYC/AML, screening and contract risk.

Flag

Supply-chain friendshoring minerals deals

Japan is negotiating overseas critical-minerals access, including talks with India on Rajasthan deposits (1.29m tonnes REO identified) and aligning with a G7 critical-minerals trade framework. These moves reshape sourcing, compliance, and long-term offtake contracting strategies.

Flag

Managed thaw with China

Canada is selectively easing bilateral trade frictions: capped import permits allow 49,000 China-made EVs at 6.1% tariff (vs 106.1%), while China lowers canola seed tariffs to ~15% and lifts some “anti-discrimination” duties. Opportunities rise, but quotas, scrutiny and geopolitics heighten compliance risk.

Flag

Container Imports Remain Soft

US import volumes are weakening under policy uncertainty. NRF projects first-half 2026 container imports at 12.21 million TEU, down 2.5% year on year, with January at 2.08 million TEU, signalling softer freight demand, inventory caution, and logistics planning volatility.

Flag

Iran shock: energy and logistics

Strait of Hormuz disruption risks higher oil, LNG and shipping costs for an energy-import-dependent economy. Korea sources about 70.7% of crude and 20.4% of LNG from the Middle East; rerouting can add 3–5 days and raise freight 50–80%.

Flag

China rare-earth controls escalate

China has shifted to targeted dual-use export controls affecting Japanese firms, including rare earths, raising input risk for EVs, electronics and defense. Japan pursues ‘zero-dependence’ steps by 2028 via recycling, stockpiles, offshore partners and deep-sea mining pilots.

Flag

Critical minerals processing buildout

Ottawa is accelerating financing and fast-tracking for critical-minerals projects, while Parliament highlights Canada’s limited refining capacity and dependence on China for processing. Investors in batteries, defence and electronics should watch offtake deals, ESG permitting timelines, and domestic upgrading incentives.

Flag

Energy price shock exposure

Iran conflict and Strait of Hormuz disruption are pushing oil above $100 and lifting European gas prices, squeezing Germany’s energy‑intensive sectors. With gas storage near ~21% and LNG competition with Asia, input costs and inflation risks rise, pressuring margins.

Flag

IMF programme and fiscal conditionality

IMF review delays and tougher fiscal targets (primary surplus, tax collection) keep disbursements uncertain, shaping FX liquidity and sovereign risk. Businesses face volatile taxation, subsidy rollback risk, and slower approvals for privatisation and governance reforms affecting market entry.

Flag

Next-generation FDI and global tax

Early 2026 registered FDI was US$6.03bn (−12.6% y/y) but disbursed rose to US$3.21bn (+8.8%, five-year high), shifting toward high-tech/green projects. Amended Investment Law (Dec 2025) streamlines post-licensing and adapts incentives to global minimum tax rules.

Flag

Expropriation and forced localization risk

State intervention tools—temporary administration, asset seizures, exit approvals and “voluntary” contributions—raise the probability of value erosion for foreign owners. Governance risk elevates hurdle rates, discourages reinvestment, and complicates M&A, IP and joint ventures.

Flag

Energy security and gas export volatility

Offshore gas operations and regional demand are increasingly politicized by conflict. Israel’s suspension of roughly 1.1 bcf/d gas exports to Egypt under force majeure illustrates export interruption risk, with knock-on effects for regional LNG flows, contract performance, and industrial energy planning for multinationals.

Flag

IMF programme drives tax-customs reform

A new 48‑month IMF EFF of about US$8.1bn anchors macro policy and structural milestones: 2026–27 tax measures (including potential VAT increases), tighter transfer‑pricing aligned to OECD/EU rules, and appointment of a permanent customs chief. Expect shifting tax burden, documentation and enforcement.

Flag

Electricity pricing and industrial tariffs

With fuel costs volatile, Taiwan’s electricity-rate reviews can shift industrial operating costs, particularly for energy-intensive fabs and data centers. Policy emphasis on price stability may delay pass-through, but eventual adjustments can be abrupt; investors should model tariff scenarios and ESG impacts.

Flag

EU sidelined in Iran strikes

U.S.–Israel operations proceeded with minimal advance consultation of EU leaders, exposing Europe’s limited leverage. Firms should expect policy volatility, fragmented EU positions, and faster U.S.-driven escalations that reshape risk assumptions for Middle East exposure and contracts.

Flag

New coalition, policy continuity risks

Post-election coalition formation improves short-term market confidence, but business groups warn against quota-driven cabinet reshuffles that could stall reforms. Investors should watch regulatory follow-through, budget execution, and policy clarity affecting investment approvals, incentives, and sectoral rules.

Flag

Foreign Investment Security Screening

US market access remains attractive, but security-led scrutiny of foreign capital is intensifying. CFIUS-style logic is spreading globally and US debate over Chinese investment is hardening, raising transaction risk, longer approval timelines, and governance requirements for cross-border mergers, technology deals, and greenfield projects.

Flag

Hormuz chokepoint shipping disruption

The Iran conflict has effectively closed or selectively restricted the Strait of Hormuz, backing up hundreds of vessels and tightening global container capacity. Expect higher freight, bunker and “emergency” surcharges, longer transit times, and contract renegotiations favoring carriers across routes.

Flag

Advanced chip controls and retaliation

U.S. export controls are constraining AI chip sales to China (e.g., Nvidia China-bound H200 production halted), while Beijing considers import approvals and local substitution. Multinationals must redesign product tiers, restructure China operations and manage licensing and end-use scrutiny.

Flag

Hormuz disruption, route diversification

Escalating Iran-linked conflict is disrupting Strait of Hormuz flows, pushing Aramco to reroute crude via the 5 mb/d East‑West pipeline to Yanbu and lifting premiums. Firms should plan for higher freight, insurance, delays, and contingency sourcing.

Flag

Energy shocks and sanctions risk

Middle East conflict and Strait of Hormuz insecurity expose India’s ~88% crude import dependence, raising freight/insurance and volatility. Temporary US waivers for Russian oil and bank de-risking (payment refusals) create compliance and supply uncertainty for refiners, shippers, and insurers.

Flag

China semiconductor supply-chain bans

A proposed FAR rule implementing NDAA Section 5949 would bar US federal procurement of electronics containing “covered” semiconductors linked to entities such as SMIC, YMTC, and CXMT, with certifications and 72‑hour reporting. Contractors must map components and redesign supply chains ahead of 2027 deadlines.

Flag

Defense rearmament, procurement bottlenecks

Rearmament is boosting opportunities for primes and SMEs, but slow procurement limits spillover. Companies call for faster processes and broader access to funds; Berlin is pursuing secure communications (a Bundeswehr “Starlink” constellation). Defense demand reshapes manufacturing, tech, and supply chains.

Flag

Ports, corridors and logistics upgrading

Cai Mep–Thi Vai’s January throughput rose 9% y/y to 711,429 TEU, with 48 weekly international routes and capacity for 24,000-TEU vessels. New expressways and bridges aim to cut inland transit times, lowering logistics costs and improving export reliability.

Flag

US–Indonesia tariff deal uncertainty

Ratification and legal uncertainty around the US–Indonesia Reciprocal Trade Agreement (ART) and a flat US 15% tariff reshape market access. Rules-of-origin conditions (e.g., US cotton) and security-alignment clauses risk supply-chain redesign, compliance burdens, and sector-specific margin shocks.