Mission Grey Daily Brief - October 26, 2024
Summary of the Global Situation for Businesses and Investors
The war in Ukraine continues to dominate global affairs, with North Korean troops moving towards the frontline and Russian forces suffering record casualty rates. Elon Musk is accused of having close ties with Vladimir Putin, withholding Starlink access from Taiwan as a favour to China. US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announced new sanctions targeting secondary entities in countries supplying Russia with critical items for its military. Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko threatened war if Russia attempts to annex Belarus. South Korea is threatening to arm Ukraine in response to North Korea's support for Russia. Putin hosted the BRICS summit in Russia, praising its role as a counterbalance to the West's "perverse methods", and pushing for the creation of a new payment system as an alternative to the SWIFT network. Israel launched a retaliatory strike on Iran.
Russia's War in Ukraine
The war in Ukraine continues to be a major concern for businesses and investors, with the conflict entering its 975th day and Russian forces suffering record casualty rates. North Korean troops are moving towards the frontline, posing a significant threat to Ukraine's defence. Vladimir Putin is pulling Kim Jong Un deeper into the war, revealing a weakness in the Kremlin's ability to recruit troops at home. North Korea's infusion of fresh soldiers will remain practically risk-free for Pyongyang, unless the United States returns to its aggressive sanctions posture against the Kim regime. Russia is no stranger to employing foreign armies, with Cossack warriors famously fighting for the tsars in centuries past and the Red Army bolstering its ranks with Mongolian troops when it invaded China at the end of World War II. Today, the "TikTok soldiers" of Chechen warlord Ramzan Kadyrov are scattered across Ukraine's front lines.
After nearly three years of fighting, Putin is running low on cannon fodder. The Kremlin is finding it difficult and expensive to entice more of Russia's poor and desperate to sign up for the war, even with promises of bonuses and good pay. In theory, Moscow could force millions of its fighting-age men into the Ukrainian meat grinder through conscription, but this option is politically perilous. The Putin regime discovered the dangers of the draft when it briefly attempted a "partial mobilization" in September 2022, with Russians responding with howls of opposition. The government quickly backed off of the effort, informing many that their call-up orders were issued by "mistake". Since then, Russia has relied on mercenary groups and lucrative payouts to make the "golden handshake" in exchange for military service in Ukraine. Even these enticements are proving to be insufficient for the Kremlin's manpower needs.
By providing fresh troops to Russia, North Korea will likely help to backfill some, but not all, of Moscow's gaps. US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin warned the news is a "very, very serious issue", but cautioned that the precise contribution of Pyongyang's troops remained unknown. For the Kim regime, support for Russia has many strategic benefits and few risks. First, protection from United Nations sanctions. Russia has used its Security Council veto to repeatedly shield North Korea from international monitoring and penalties for its prohibited missile tests and nuclear weapons development. Second, a security guarantee from the world's largest nuclear power. This summer, Moscow and Pyongyang agreed to a NATO-style mutual defense pledge, promising to aid each other in the event of war. Third, North Korea's troops will gain valuable combat experience if they survive. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the Kim regime will likely benefit from Russian technology transfers that could greatly accelerate its missile and nuclear programs.
In exchange, the costs to North Korea are a pittance. An expeditionary force of roughly 12,000 soldiers is small potatoes compared to Kim's million-man army. His related shipments of around three million artillery shells to Russia is also a small fraction of his total stockpile. The danger to Ukraine is great, however, with a senior Ukrainian official stating that the addition of North Korean artillery on the battlefield has been "much worse than the Shaheds", the Iranian-designed kamikaze drones that Russia is using to pound Kyiv's troops and infrastructure.
Elon Musk's Alleged Ties with Vladimir Putin
Elon Musk is accused of having close ties with Vladimir Putin, withholding Starlink access from Taiwan as a favour to China. The Wall Street Journal reported that Putin asked Musk to withhold Starlink from Taiwan as a favour to China's Xi Jinping, with unnamed officials stating that Musk has been in regular contact with Putin since 2022. The Journal reported that in late 2023, Musk received his first request from the Kremlin to refrain from activating Starlink over Taiwan, citing a former Russian intelligence officer. The request was made for Beijing's sake, as Moscow increasingly relied on trade from China. Based on The Journal's findings, it's unclear exactly how many times Putin or his administration asked Musk for the favour.
The Chinese embassy in Washington told The Journal that it was not aware of the specifics of this arrangement, and did not respond to a separate request for comment sent outside regular business hours by Business Insider. Taiwan does not have official Starlink access because its laws require satellite services to be provided through a joint venture with a local operator that maintains majority ownership. The New York Times reported that SpaceX was unwilling to accept such an arrangement, and the self-governed island is thus creating its own low-earth orbit satellite network. Musk's reported conversations with Putin coincide with his apparent shift in rhetoric toward Ukraine in late 2022. Until that point, the billionaire had vocally supported Kyiv, providing it with 15,000 Starlink terminals.
In October of that year, he began seeking funding from the Pentagon to continue the free services, tweeting that they were taking a financial toll. Musk also tweeted a poll that month about a peace plan reflecting some of Russia's war demands at the time, including Russia's formal obtaining of Crimea and a guarantee of Ukraine's neutrality. The billionaire's post drew the fury of pro-Ukrainian accounts, but he added that he only suggested those measures to avoid further death in Ukraine and the risk of nuclear war. "Obviously, we are pro-Ukraine", he tweeted, saying that SpaceX had spent about $80 million on free Starlink for Ukraine. Two weeks later, Ian Bremmer, a political scientist who founded Eurasia Group, wrote in an email to his subscribers that Musk had spoken with Putin before tweeting this controversial peace plan. Per Bremmer, Putin had told Musk that if he could not accomplish his goals in Ukraine, he would turn to "major escalation". Musk and the Kremlin said Bremmer's report was untrue.
The allegations present awkward implications for the US, with Musk's SpaceX holding defense and space contracts with the Pentagon and NASA. An analysis published on Monday by The New York Times reported that the company has $3.6 billion in contracts with the Defense Department — primarily for launching American satellites into orbit — and $11.8 billion with NASA. Russian forces were reported to be buying up Starlink terminals earlier this year to help their invasion of Ukraine. The system has been vital to Ukrainian forces over the two-year conflict. But Russian agents are reportedly now using 'intermediaries' in Dubai in order to get their hands on the terminals, circumventing western sanctions imposed on Russia. House Democrats warned that Russia's use of the system in Ukraine could raise national security concerns in March. In a letter to SpaceX, two Democrats on the House Oversight Committee demanded information about Russia's potential illegal acquisition of the satellite-enabled terminals, according to the Washington Post. The letter cited recent allegations from Ukrainian intelligence officials, who say that Russian troops are using Starlink terminals to coordinate war efforts in eastern Ukraine, in potential violation of US sanctions.
As founder of SpaceX, Musk has cultivated close ties with US military and intelligence, with access to sensitive information. The company is the primary rocket launcher for both NASA and the Pentagon. Starlink has said it does not do any business in or with Russia, and Musk has branded claims of association with Putin "absurd". Dmitry Peskov, spokesperson for the Kremlin, insisted neither Putin nor the Kremlin were in regular contact with Musk. Musk has not yet commented on the claims published in the WSJ. The Kremlin today slammed the claims in the WSJ report as "not true" and "absolutely false". While Beijing remains officially neutral on the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, it has supported Putin's claims that the war was provoked by western aggression. The US this month imposed its first sanctions on Chinese firms for making weapons for Russia, accusing them of collaborating with Russian defence firms to produce drones vital to the war effort.
US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen Announces New Sanctions
US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announced new sanctions targeting secondary entities in countries supplying Russia with critical items for its military. Yellen told world financial leaders gathered in Washington for annual meetings of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank that "We will unveil strong new sanctions targeting those facilitating the Kremlin's war machine, including intermediaries in third countries that are supplying Russia with critical inputs for its military". The IMF and World Bank meetings mark the last major international finance gathering to be held during President Joe Biden's administration and come as the state of the economy and inflation are top concerns for American voters. The presidential election between the Republican party nominee, former President Donald Trump, and Democratic party nominee Vice President Kamala Harris is slated to be decided on November 5, with the outcome expected to have an enormous impact on global finance and the world's economy.
Yellen touched on the use of the proceeds from frozen Russian sovereign assets to provide loans for Ukraine. As she spoke, the European Parliament approved a loan of up to 35 billion euros ($38 billion) for Ukraine's defense and reconstruction that will be repaid using future revenues from Russian central bank assets frozen abroad. Yellen referred to the overall $50 billion loan package being negotiated by the Group of Seven and EU allies, saying the United States expects to be able to contribute $20 billion. The U.S. Treasury Department is "working tirelessly to unlock the economic value of frozen Russian sovereign assets to aid Ukraine", Yellen said. Earlier on October 22, Britain announced its readiness to provide Ukraine with a loan of<co: 2>Earlier on October 22, Britain announced its readiness to provide Ukraine with a loan of
Further Reading:
As North Korea, Iran and China support Russia’s war, is a ‘new axis’ emerging? - CNN
If South Korea decides to get involved in Ukraine, it has powerful options - Business Insider
Israel launches retaliatory strike on Iran - Financial Times
Lukashenko warns of war if Russia attempts to annex Belarus - RBC-Ukraine
North Korea’s troops reveal Putin’s Ukraine pickle — no more cannon fodder - New York Post
Putin 'asked Elon Musk to switch off internet over Taiwan as a favour to China' - Daily Mail
Vance says it is Ukraine's decision to end the war - NBC News
Vladimir Putin signals North Korean troops are in Russia - Financial Times
Themes around the World:
AI model governance and IP leakage
Accusations that Chinese AI labs mined frontier models via fake accounts highlight growing IP and cybersecurity risk in cross-border AI collaboration. Expect tighter access controls by US labs, more audits of data/model use, and heightened due diligence for partnerships and cloud usage.
Expanded Russia sanctions enforcement
The UK announced its broadest Russia sanctions since 2022, targeting Transneft (moving >80% of Russia’s crude exports) plus 48 shadow-fleet tankers and 2Rivers-linked entities. Firms face heightened compliance, shipping/insurance constraints and secondary exposure risks in energy trade.
Supply-chain diversification accelerates
Geopolitical risk is pushing major buyers and contract manufacturers to diversify production to India, Vietnam, and the US, while Taiwanese champions expand abroad. This reshapes supplier qualification, lead times, and capex plans—creating opportunities for new regional ecosystems.
Monetary policy uncertainty and weak growth
Bank of Canada’s 2.25% hold reflects subdued growth, elevated unemployment (around 6.8%) and trade-driven uncertainty. Rate-path unpredictability affects project finance, M&A valuations and consumer demand, while exchange-rate sensitivity complicates cross-border pricing and hedging strategies.
Currency stability and tighter finance
Bank Indonesia is prioritizing rupiah stability over growth, holding the policy rate around 4.75% and signaling sizable FX intervention amid foreign outflows and rating/market concerns. Higher funding costs and volatility affect capex timing, import pricing, hedging, and repatriation strategies.
Green trade barriers and ESG compliance
EU CBAM moves into payments in 2026, requiring verified emissions data and carbon certificates for covered imports. Multinationals’ RE100 and ESG requirements are pushing “green industrial parks,” influencing site selection, supplier qualification, and capex for metering and decarbonisation.
Tariff volatility and legal limits
Rapid shifts in US tariffs—courts curbing IEEPA-based duties while the administration pivots to Section 122/232/301—keep import costs and pricing unstable. Firms should scenario-plan for sudden rate changes, refund litigation, and compliance-driven sourcing re-optimisation.
Hormuz chokepoint and war-risk
Escalating conflict has threatened closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a route for ~20 million bpd—around one-fifth of global oil consumption. Tanker traffic disruptions, record freight rates, and shrinking war-risk insurance raise costs and delay imports/exports across Asia-linked supply chains.
Auto and EV policy reset
Canada is recalibrating its automotive strategy amid US auto tariffs and Chinese EV entry, shifting from a strict sales mandate toward tougher emissions standards and renewed consumer incentives. Policy changes will move demand, reshape supplier localization, and affect battery, charging, and assembly investment decisions.
Industrial incentives, WTO scrutiny
PLI/industrial policy is deepening local manufacturing and exports (₹2.16 lakh crore investment; ₹8.3 lakh crore exports), but faces rising trade-law friction. China has triggered a WTO dispute over domestic content-linked incentives in batteries, autos and EVs.
Semiconductor manufacturing scale-up
India is accelerating the India Semiconductor Mission: ISM 2.0 allocates ₹40,000 crore, while projects like the ₹3,700‑crore HCL–Foxconn OSAT aim for 20,000 wafers/month by 2027. Incentives attract supply-chain relocation but execution and ecosystem gaps remain.
Monetary easing and credit conditions
The central bank cut policy rates by 100bps (deposit 19%, lending 20%) and lowered reserve requirements to 16%, signaling disinflation (headline ~11.9% Jan 2026). Lower funding costs may revive investment, but real rates and inflation risks persist.
Expanding Section 232 industrial tariffs
Sector tariffs imposed on national-security grounds—steel, aluminum, autos, copper, lumber and more—remain intact and may broaden. This raises landed costs for manufacturers, affects supplier choice, and can trigger retaliatory measures and localization pressures across allied markets.
Nearshoring under rules-of-origin
Mexico’s relative tariff advantage for USMCA-compliant goods, amid broader U.S. tariff actions, reinforces nearshoring incentives. Companies face higher compliance demands on regional value content and sourcing documentation, influencing site selection, supplier localization, and cost structures across automotive, electronics, and machinery.
Cross-strait coercion and shipping
Rising PRC air–naval activity and ‘quarantine’ style coercion around Taiwan increases shipping and war-risk insurance costs, threatens port throughput, and creates disruption risk for time-sensitive imports (especially LNG) and export logistics, affecting continuity planning and contract clauses.
Capital markets opening and IPO pipeline
Tadawul is opening more broadly to foreign investors, with expectations of incremental inflows alongside continued IPO activity across industrials, energy services and contractors. For multinationals, this improves local funding options and exit routes, but brings higher governance and disclosure scrutiny.
Tariff volatility and legal risk
Supreme Court limits emergency-tariff authority, but the administration is pursuing temporary Section 122 duties (10% rising to 15%) and fresh Section 301/232 probes. Companies face price shocks, contract renegotiations, customs reclassification and accelerated supply-chain diversification decisions.
SOE losses and quasi-fiscal drains
State-owned enterprises create material fiscal and payment risks: liabilities ~Rs9.6tr and fiscal support ~Rs2.1tr (≈16% of tax revenue), concentrated in power and transport. Reform/privatization outcomes affect sovereign solvency, tariffs, and contract enforcement with suppliers.
Private capital entry via PPPs
Policy momentum is opening network industries to private participation—electricity trading, wheeling, and rail/port concessions—supporting investment pipelines (e.g., 4.7GW private power projects closed 2023–2025). Execution quality will determine returns, dispute risk, and competitive neutrality.
Ports and maritime security exposure
Strategic gateways such as Haifa face heightened missile/drone risk and operational contingency measures. Even when terminals remain open, security protocols, rerouting, and insurer requirements can slow throughput, complicate just‑in‑time inventory, and raise demurrage and storage costs.
Electricity cost, grid stability risks
Load shedding has eased, but Eskom output is declining and tariffs continue rising; municipal arrears exceed R110bn, prompting potential supply interruptions. Businesses face cost volatility, embedded-generation acceleration, and contingency planning needs for facilities in high‑debt municipalities.
Sanctions enforcement and maritime risk
U.S. sanctions and enforcement pressure on Russia, Iran, and evasion networks increases compliance burdens across shipping, insurance, commodities, and finance. Firms must strengthen screening for “dark fleet” activity, origin documentation, and contractual protections against secondary-risk exposure.
Inversión extranjera: más reinversión
Aunque la IED alcanzó ~US$41,000 millones hasta 3T2025 (+15% interanual), solo ~US$6,500 millones fueron proyectos nuevos. La cautela privada se asocia a incertidumbre regulatoria y comercial, afectando pipelines de nearshoring, alianzas y financiamiento de nuevas plantas.
Supply-chain localisation via PLI
India’s PLI programmes have disbursed ₹28,748 crore across 14 sectors, approving 836 projects with ₹2.16 lakh crore investment, ₹8.3 lakh crore exports and 1.439 million jobs. Import substitution is material (mobile imports down ~77%), affecting sourcing, incentives, and partner selection.
Shadow fleet logistics under scrutiny
Iran’s crude exports rely on AIS manipulation, reflagging, and ship‑to‑ship transfers via hubs such as Malaysia; recent India interdictions highlight rising enforcement spillover. Firms face higher freight/insurance costs, voyage delays, cargo provenance disputes, and elevated KYC/Know‑Your‑Cargo requirements.
Volatilidad macro: moneda e inflación
La depreciación del rial y episodios de inflación elevada distorsionan precios, márgenes y planificación. Empresas enfrentan controles de divisas, dificultades de repatriación, mayor riesgo de impago y costos de importación impredecibles, impulsando dolarización informal y contratos más cortos.
Strategic sectors: drones and minerals
Ukraine’s drone output surged to about 1.5 million units in 2024, while critical minerals (lithium, titanium, rare earths) draw US/EU interest. Investment upside is high, but component supply dependencies and licensing, security, and governance risks complicate partnerships.
Critical minerals and rare-earth push
Budget 2026 launched rare-earth corridors (Odisha, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, Tamil Nadu) and a ₹7,280‑crore magnet incentive to cut reliance on China, which supplies over 45% of India’s rare-earth needs; faster approvals and processing capacity reshape EV, electronics, defence supply chains.
Energy price pass-through inflation
Oil and LNG price spikes quickly feed Korea’s power and industrial costs; LNG is ~28% of electricity generation. Higher JKM and crude-indexed contracts can lift wholesale power prices and strain Kepco/Kogas finances, increasing probability of tariff hikes and cost-push inflation.
Regional conflict spillovers
Gaza and broader regional war dynamics elevate security and operational risks, including aviation disruptions and refugee-related fiscal strain. Firms should plan for intermittent border, shipping, and air-route interruptions, plus episodic social and political pressures that can affect permitting and enforcement.
Russia sanctions and enforcement intensification
The UK rolled out its largest Russia sanctions package since 2022, targeting Transneft, 48 shadow-fleet tankers and 175 2Rivers-linked companies, pushing total designations above 3,000. Firms must strengthen screening, shipping due diligence, finance controls, and re-export risk management.
Rail freight pivot via Channel Tunnel
A ~£15m move to take control of Barking Eurohub aims to restore regular intermodal freight trains through the Channel Tunnel, potentially removing ~140,000 HGVs from Kent roads annually. This could improve UK–EU supply-chain resilience and reduce Brexit-related road disruption risks.
Defense spending widens fiscal strain
Israel approved an additional 9 billion shekels ($2.9bn) for war costs, signaling a higher 2026 deficit and potential ratings pressure. Expect increased taxation or spending reprioritization, higher sovereign funding needs, and knock-on impacts on public procurement cycles and private-sector financing conditions.
GX-ETS carbon pricing starts
Japan’s GX‑ETS begins April 2026, covering roughly 300–400 large emitters (≥100,000 tCO2 Scope 1). Allowance price band is ~¥1,700–¥4,300/t, with limited offsets. Compliance costs will affect manufacturing, auto, steel, procurement and export competitiveness.
Critical minerals onshoring and alliances
Australia is funding critical-minerals refining R&D ($53m public plus $185m partners) and deepening cooperation with Canada and G7 partners to reduce China dependence. This supports downstream processing investment, but highlights infrastructure, permitting, and cost-competitiveness constraints.
Sanctions compliance and re-export controls
Reuters reporting highlights ongoing “parallel” trade routes to Russia via China, prompting Korea to crack down on indirect exports, including used vehicles. Companies face elevated screening expectations, documentation burdens, and reputational risk if products are diverted to sanctioned end users.