Mission Grey Daily Brief - October 26, 2024
Summary of the Global Situation for Businesses and Investors
The war in Ukraine continues to dominate global affairs, with North Korean troops moving towards the frontline and Russian forces suffering record casualty rates. Elon Musk is accused of having close ties with Vladimir Putin, withholding Starlink access from Taiwan as a favour to China. US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announced new sanctions targeting secondary entities in countries supplying Russia with critical items for its military. Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko threatened war if Russia attempts to annex Belarus. South Korea is threatening to arm Ukraine in response to North Korea's support for Russia. Putin hosted the BRICS summit in Russia, praising its role as a counterbalance to the West's "perverse methods", and pushing for the creation of a new payment system as an alternative to the SWIFT network. Israel launched a retaliatory strike on Iran.
Russia's War in Ukraine
The war in Ukraine continues to be a major concern for businesses and investors, with the conflict entering its 975th day and Russian forces suffering record casualty rates. North Korean troops are moving towards the frontline, posing a significant threat to Ukraine's defence. Vladimir Putin is pulling Kim Jong Un deeper into the war, revealing a weakness in the Kremlin's ability to recruit troops at home. North Korea's infusion of fresh soldiers will remain practically risk-free for Pyongyang, unless the United States returns to its aggressive sanctions posture against the Kim regime. Russia is no stranger to employing foreign armies, with Cossack warriors famously fighting for the tsars in centuries past and the Red Army bolstering its ranks with Mongolian troops when it invaded China at the end of World War II. Today, the "TikTok soldiers" of Chechen warlord Ramzan Kadyrov are scattered across Ukraine's front lines.
After nearly three years of fighting, Putin is running low on cannon fodder. The Kremlin is finding it difficult and expensive to entice more of Russia's poor and desperate to sign up for the war, even with promises of bonuses and good pay. In theory, Moscow could force millions of its fighting-age men into the Ukrainian meat grinder through conscription, but this option is politically perilous. The Putin regime discovered the dangers of the draft when it briefly attempted a "partial mobilization" in September 2022, with Russians responding with howls of opposition. The government quickly backed off of the effort, informing many that their call-up orders were issued by "mistake". Since then, Russia has relied on mercenary groups and lucrative payouts to make the "golden handshake" in exchange for military service in Ukraine. Even these enticements are proving to be insufficient for the Kremlin's manpower needs.
By providing fresh troops to Russia, North Korea will likely help to backfill some, but not all, of Moscow's gaps. US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin warned the news is a "very, very serious issue", but cautioned that the precise contribution of Pyongyang's troops remained unknown. For the Kim regime, support for Russia has many strategic benefits and few risks. First, protection from United Nations sanctions. Russia has used its Security Council veto to repeatedly shield North Korea from international monitoring and penalties for its prohibited missile tests and nuclear weapons development. Second, a security guarantee from the world's largest nuclear power. This summer, Moscow and Pyongyang agreed to a NATO-style mutual defense pledge, promising to aid each other in the event of war. Third, North Korea's troops will gain valuable combat experience if they survive. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the Kim regime will likely benefit from Russian technology transfers that could greatly accelerate its missile and nuclear programs.
In exchange, the costs to North Korea are a pittance. An expeditionary force of roughly 12,000 soldiers is small potatoes compared to Kim's million-man army. His related shipments of around three million artillery shells to Russia is also a small fraction of his total stockpile. The danger to Ukraine is great, however, with a senior Ukrainian official stating that the addition of North Korean artillery on the battlefield has been "much worse than the Shaheds", the Iranian-designed kamikaze drones that Russia is using to pound Kyiv's troops and infrastructure.
Elon Musk's Alleged Ties with Vladimir Putin
Elon Musk is accused of having close ties with Vladimir Putin, withholding Starlink access from Taiwan as a favour to China. The Wall Street Journal reported that Putin asked Musk to withhold Starlink from Taiwan as a favour to China's Xi Jinping, with unnamed officials stating that Musk has been in regular contact with Putin since 2022. The Journal reported that in late 2023, Musk received his first request from the Kremlin to refrain from activating Starlink over Taiwan, citing a former Russian intelligence officer. The request was made for Beijing's sake, as Moscow increasingly relied on trade from China. Based on The Journal's findings, it's unclear exactly how many times Putin or his administration asked Musk for the favour.
The Chinese embassy in Washington told The Journal that it was not aware of the specifics of this arrangement, and did not respond to a separate request for comment sent outside regular business hours by Business Insider. Taiwan does not have official Starlink access because its laws require satellite services to be provided through a joint venture with a local operator that maintains majority ownership. The New York Times reported that SpaceX was unwilling to accept such an arrangement, and the self-governed island is thus creating its own low-earth orbit satellite network. Musk's reported conversations with Putin coincide with his apparent shift in rhetoric toward Ukraine in late 2022. Until that point, the billionaire had vocally supported Kyiv, providing it with 15,000 Starlink terminals.
In October of that year, he began seeking funding from the Pentagon to continue the free services, tweeting that they were taking a financial toll. Musk also tweeted a poll that month about a peace plan reflecting some of Russia's war demands at the time, including Russia's formal obtaining of Crimea and a guarantee of Ukraine's neutrality. The billionaire's post drew the fury of pro-Ukrainian accounts, but he added that he only suggested those measures to avoid further death in Ukraine and the risk of nuclear war. "Obviously, we are pro-Ukraine", he tweeted, saying that SpaceX had spent about $80 million on free Starlink for Ukraine. Two weeks later, Ian Bremmer, a political scientist who founded Eurasia Group, wrote in an email to his subscribers that Musk had spoken with Putin before tweeting this controversial peace plan. Per Bremmer, Putin had told Musk that if he could not accomplish his goals in Ukraine, he would turn to "major escalation". Musk and the Kremlin said Bremmer's report was untrue.
The allegations present awkward implications for the US, with Musk's SpaceX holding defense and space contracts with the Pentagon and NASA. An analysis published on Monday by The New York Times reported that the company has $3.6 billion in contracts with the Defense Department — primarily for launching American satellites into orbit — and $11.8 billion with NASA. Russian forces were reported to be buying up Starlink terminals earlier this year to help their invasion of Ukraine. The system has been vital to Ukrainian forces over the two-year conflict. But Russian agents are reportedly now using 'intermediaries' in Dubai in order to get their hands on the terminals, circumventing western sanctions imposed on Russia. House Democrats warned that Russia's use of the system in Ukraine could raise national security concerns in March. In a letter to SpaceX, two Democrats on the House Oversight Committee demanded information about Russia's potential illegal acquisition of the satellite-enabled terminals, according to the Washington Post. The letter cited recent allegations from Ukrainian intelligence officials, who say that Russian troops are using Starlink terminals to coordinate war efforts in eastern Ukraine, in potential violation of US sanctions.
As founder of SpaceX, Musk has cultivated close ties with US military and intelligence, with access to sensitive information. The company is the primary rocket launcher for both NASA and the Pentagon. Starlink has said it does not do any business in or with Russia, and Musk has branded claims of association with Putin "absurd". Dmitry Peskov, spokesperson for the Kremlin, insisted neither Putin nor the Kremlin were in regular contact with Musk. Musk has not yet commented on the claims published in the WSJ. The Kremlin today slammed the claims in the WSJ report as "not true" and "absolutely false". While Beijing remains officially neutral on the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, it has supported Putin's claims that the war was provoked by western aggression. The US this month imposed its first sanctions on Chinese firms for making weapons for Russia, accusing them of collaborating with Russian defence firms to produce drones vital to the war effort.
US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen Announces New Sanctions
US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announced new sanctions targeting secondary entities in countries supplying Russia with critical items for its military. Yellen told world financial leaders gathered in Washington for annual meetings of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank that "We will unveil strong new sanctions targeting those facilitating the Kremlin's war machine, including intermediaries in third countries that are supplying Russia with critical inputs for its military". The IMF and World Bank meetings mark the last major international finance gathering to be held during President Joe Biden's administration and come as the state of the economy and inflation are top concerns for American voters. The presidential election between the Republican party nominee, former President Donald Trump, and Democratic party nominee Vice President Kamala Harris is slated to be decided on November 5, with the outcome expected to have an enormous impact on global finance and the world's economy.
Yellen touched on the use of the proceeds from frozen Russian sovereign assets to provide loans for Ukraine. As she spoke, the European Parliament approved a loan of up to 35 billion euros ($38 billion) for Ukraine's defense and reconstruction that will be repaid using future revenues from Russian central bank assets frozen abroad. Yellen referred to the overall $50 billion loan package being negotiated by the Group of Seven and EU allies, saying the United States expects to be able to contribute $20 billion. The U.S. Treasury Department is "working tirelessly to unlock the economic value of frozen Russian sovereign assets to aid Ukraine", Yellen said. Earlier on October 22, Britain announced its readiness to provide Ukraine with a loan of<co: 2>Earlier on October 22, Britain announced its readiness to provide Ukraine with a loan of
Further Reading:
As North Korea, Iran and China support Russia’s war, is a ‘new axis’ emerging? - CNN
If South Korea decides to get involved in Ukraine, it has powerful options - Business Insider
Israel launches retaliatory strike on Iran - Financial Times
Lukashenko warns of war if Russia attempts to annex Belarus - RBC-Ukraine
North Korea’s troops reveal Putin’s Ukraine pickle — no more cannon fodder - New York Post
Putin 'asked Elon Musk to switch off internet over Taiwan as a favour to China' - Daily Mail
Vance says it is Ukraine's decision to end the war - NBC News
Vladimir Putin signals North Korean troops are in Russia - Financial Times
Themes around the World:
US-China Tariff Truce Fragility
Washington is preserving substantial tariffs on Chinese goods while seeking a more managed trade relationship, with U.S. officials citing a 24% drop in the goods deficit and over 30% reduction with China. Firms should expect continued policy volatility, sourcing shifts, and compliance costs.
Nuclear Policy Reversal Reshapes Power
Facing energy-security concerns and AI-driven electricity demand, Taipei is reconsidering nuclear restarts after last year’s phaseout. The shift could alter long-term power costs, emissions pathways, and reliability expectations for foreign investors in semiconductors, heavy industry, and digital infrastructure.
Coalition Politics Complicate Policy Signalling
Coalition dynamics continue to shape economic policy messaging and reform delivery nationally and provincially. Ongoing tensions over budgets, affirmative action, land and empowerment policies can slow implementation, complicate investor forecasting and raise uncertainty around the pace of structural reform.
Metal and Industrial Tariff Spillovers
Possible U.S. revisions to steel and aluminum tariffs could apply duties to the full value of imported derivative goods, not only metal content. For Mexico’s deeply integrated automotive, machinery and appliance supply chains, that would materially raise landed costs and margin pressure.
Sector Tariffs Reshape Supply Chains
Revised Section 232 measures now cover steel, copper, aluminum derivatives, and selected pharmaceuticals, with rates reaching 50% or 100% for some products. These actions will alter procurement economics, favor localization, and raise costs for manufacturers reliant on imported industrial and healthcare inputs.
High Rates Suppress Investment
Tight monetary policy, weakening profits and falling business activity are undermining capital formation. Investment fell 2.3% last year and is expected to decline further, while high borrowing costs and softer demand reduce expansion plans, financing availability and corporate resilience.
Supply Chain Diversification Push
Seoul is accelerating supply diversification through strategic oil swaps, new sourcing from 17 countries and diplomatic outreach to Kazakhstan, Oman and Saudi Arabia. These measures improve resilience but imply higher procurement costs, longer transit times and new supplier-management requirements for businesses.
Labor market tightness sustains costs
Unemployment rose to 5.8% in the quarter to February but remained historically low, while average real monthly earnings reached a record R$3,679. Tight labor conditions support consumption yet can raise wage bills, services inflation and recruitment constraints for manufacturers and service operators.
China Ties Bring Mixed Risks
Canada is expanding commercial engagement with China, including lower tariffs on up to 49,000 Chinese EVs annually and deeper financial ties. Opportunities come with heightened data-security, supply-chain integrity, and forced-labour due-diligence risks that multinationals must manage carefully.
Trade Diversion from China
Chinese exporters are redirecting goods to the UK as US tariffs reshape trade flows, lowering prices for cars, electronics and furniture. This may ease goods inflation but intensifies competitive pressure on domestic manufacturers, pricing power, sourcing choices and trade-defense policy risk.
Energy Infrastructure and Gas Exports
Offshore gas remains strategically important but vulnerable to shutdowns and attack risk. Closure of Leviathan and Karish cost an estimated NIS 1.5 billion in one month, raised electricity generation costs by roughly 22%, and disrupted exports to Egypt and Jordan before partial recovery.
Fuel Shock Inflation Exposure
South Africa’s reliance on road freight has amplified exposure to higher global oil prices and diesel shortages, with implications for agriculture, retail and manufacturing. Rising transport and input costs could feed inflation, disrupt deliveries and complicate operating-margin planning.
Foreign Investment Screening Expands
US policy increasingly treats economic security as national security, sustaining stricter scrutiny of foreign acquisitions, sensitive technology access, and supply-chain exposure. Investors should expect longer approvals, more mitigation requirements, and greater political risk in semiconductors, critical minerals, infrastructure, data, and advanced manufacturing.
Immigration Curbs Strain Labor Supply
Tighter visa rules are raising costs for high-skilled hiring, including a reported $100,000 H-1B fee, while freezes affecting some foreign doctors worsen shortages. Companies in technology, healthcare, research and rural operations face staffing gaps, higher labor costs and execution risks.
Anti-Relocation Supply Chain Rules
New Chinese regulations can investigate and penalize foreign companies that shift sourcing or production away from China under foreign political pressure. The rules increase legal, operational, and personnel risk, complicating divestments, China-plus-one strategies, supplier reallocation, and broader supply-chain restructuring plans.
Investor Confidence Still Fragile
South Africa fell five places to 12th in Kearney’s developing-market investment ranking as concerns persist over governance, infrastructure, logistics, and policy delivery. Large headline pledges contrast with modest realized inflows, reinforcing caution around project execution and medium-term returns.
Energy Nationalism and Pemex Exposure
Mexico’s energy framework remains a major investment constraint as U.S. officials challenge preferential treatment for Pemex and CFE, permit delays and fuel restrictions. Pemex’s overdue payments above $2.5 billion to U.S. suppliers and broader debt pressures raise counterparty, compliance and operating risks for energy, industrial and logistics investors.
Settlement Expansion External Pressure
Approval of 34 new West Bank settlements has intensified criticism from the EU and other partners. This raises medium-term risks of diplomatic friction, selective sanctions, ESG scrutiny, and compliance complications for firms with exposure to Israeli entities or contested territories.
Rupee Flexibility And Monetary Tightness
The State Bank has kept the policy rate at 10.5% and signaled further hikes if inflation rises, while allowing exchange-rate flexibility. Companies should prepare for higher borrowing costs, rupee volatility, and evolving foreign-exchange rules affecting payments and hedging.
War-driven infrastructure disruption
Russian strikes continue to damage power, gas and transport infrastructure, forcing periodic industrial restrictions, blackouts and higher operating costs. More than 9 GW of generation was hit, with only about 4 GW restored, raising acute continuity and logistics risks for investors and manufacturers.
US Tariff Negotiations Uncertainty
India’s unsettled interim trade framework with the United States leaves tariff exposure fluid after Section 301 probes and legal reversals. Exporters in textiles, chemicals and engineering face planning uncertainty, while investors must price in shifting market-access terms and compliance risk.
War-driven fiscal policy strain
The budget deficit narrowed temporarily to 4.2% of GDP, but deferred war financing, compensation payments and elevated defense spending point to renewed fiscal pressure. Tax changes, rising state borrowing needs and spending crowd-out could affect demand, infrastructure and business costs.
Regional Trade Frictions Inside SACU
Import restrictions by Namibia, Botswana and Mozambique on South African produce are disrupting regional food supply chains and undermining SACU and AfCFTA commitments. With 17% of South Africa’s $15.1 billion agricultural exports going to SACU in 2025, policy unpredictability is rising.
Electricity Security and LNG
Power reliability is now a core operational variable. Electricity demand topped 1 billion kWh on March 31, with peak load at 48,789 MW, pushing Vietnam to expand LNG import capacity, add 1,200 MW at Vung Ang 2, and accelerate delayed grid projects.
Energy Shock and Stagflation
The UK is unusually exposed to imported gas and Middle East disruption, with OECD cutting 2026 growth to 0.7% and raising inflation to 4.0%. Higher energy, transport and financing costs are squeezing demand, margins, investment planning and cross-border operating budgets.
CPEC Delays And Security Concerns
China is pressing Pakistan to accelerate stalled CPEC projects and secure Chinese personnel, particularly in Balochistan and Gwadar. Delays, weak execution, and militant threats are undermining infrastructure momentum and could slow new Chinese investment, industrial expansion, and regional connectivity plans.
Expansionary Budget and Debt Pressure
Japan passed a record ¥122.31 trillion fiscal 2026 budget, funded partly by ¥29.58 trillion in new bonds. While supportive for demand, the mix of high debt, rising yields and possible extra energy relief may increase fiscal sustainability and financing concerns.
FDI Rules Reopen Capital
India’s revised FDI framework for land-border countries allows up to 10% non-controlling investment under the automatic route and promises 60-day approvals in selected manufacturing sectors. This could unlock capital, technology partnerships, and deeper supplier ecosystems while preserving security screening.
Energy Transition Investment Boom
Brazil’s power matrix remains highly renewable, with 84.6% of installed capacity and 88.2% of generation from renewables. Offshore wind, solar, and green hydrogen are attracting major foreign capital, creating industrial opportunities while exposing investors to grid, licensing, and execution bottlenecks.
Renewables And Power Transition Recalibration
Taiwan is expanding offshore wind, offering 3.6 GW in a new auction, while reconsidering nuclear restarts to support AI-driven electricity demand. This shifting energy mix creates opportunities in infrastructure and clean power, but regulatory uncertainty complicates long-term industrial planning.
Sanctions Volatility Reshapes War Economics
Shifting U.S. and EU sanctions policy on Russian oil affects Ukraine indirectly by influencing Moscow’s revenues, energy prices, and the wider risk environment. Kyiv says over 110 shadow-fleet tankers carry about 12 million tonnes worth $10 billion, underscoring geopolitical exposure for traders.
Import Costs Hit US Buyers
Recent analyses show foreign exporters absorb only about 5% of US tariff costs, leaving American firms and consumers to bear most of the burden. Higher landed costs, margin compression, and selective price increases will continue shaping procurement, pricing, and contract strategies.
Sectoral Protectionism Expands Rapidly
The United States is increasingly using national-security tools and industrial policy to protect strategic sectors, including metals, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors and clean technology. This favors localized production and subsidy-seeking investment, but raises input costs and complicates procurement for internationally exposed manufacturers.
Export Market Access Pressure
Thailand faces US tariff investigation risks and potential trade diversion in Europe as the EU-India FTA advances. With exports to the EU worth US$26.4 billion and bilateral EU trade at US$45.03 billion, pressure is rising to accelerate Thailand’s own trade agreements.
Industrial Overcapacity Export Spillover
China’s export-led adjustment amid weak domestic demand is sustaining large trade surpluses and heightening global backlash over overcapacity, especially in EVs, solar, and other manufacturing sectors. This increases anti-dumping exposure, tariff risk, and uncertainty for firms reliant on China-centered production and export platforms.
Energy Security Pressures Manufacturing
Power and fuel risks are becoming a core operating issue. Daily electricity use already reached 1.005 billion kWh, while officials warn of tighter supply and possible southern shortages later. Higher energy costs can disrupt factories, data centers and export production planning.