Mission Grey Daily Brief - October 26, 2024
Summary of the Global Situation for Businesses and Investors
The war in Ukraine continues to dominate global affairs, with North Korean troops moving towards the frontline and Russian forces suffering record casualty rates. Elon Musk is accused of having close ties with Vladimir Putin, withholding Starlink access from Taiwan as a favour to China. US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announced new sanctions targeting secondary entities in countries supplying Russia with critical items for its military. Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko threatened war if Russia attempts to annex Belarus. South Korea is threatening to arm Ukraine in response to North Korea's support for Russia. Putin hosted the BRICS summit in Russia, praising its role as a counterbalance to the West's "perverse methods", and pushing for the creation of a new payment system as an alternative to the SWIFT network. Israel launched a retaliatory strike on Iran.
Russia's War in Ukraine
The war in Ukraine continues to be a major concern for businesses and investors, with the conflict entering its 975th day and Russian forces suffering record casualty rates. North Korean troops are moving towards the frontline, posing a significant threat to Ukraine's defence. Vladimir Putin is pulling Kim Jong Un deeper into the war, revealing a weakness in the Kremlin's ability to recruit troops at home. North Korea's infusion of fresh soldiers will remain practically risk-free for Pyongyang, unless the United States returns to its aggressive sanctions posture against the Kim regime. Russia is no stranger to employing foreign armies, with Cossack warriors famously fighting for the tsars in centuries past and the Red Army bolstering its ranks with Mongolian troops when it invaded China at the end of World War II. Today, the "TikTok soldiers" of Chechen warlord Ramzan Kadyrov are scattered across Ukraine's front lines.
After nearly three years of fighting, Putin is running low on cannon fodder. The Kremlin is finding it difficult and expensive to entice more of Russia's poor and desperate to sign up for the war, even with promises of bonuses and good pay. In theory, Moscow could force millions of its fighting-age men into the Ukrainian meat grinder through conscription, but this option is politically perilous. The Putin regime discovered the dangers of the draft when it briefly attempted a "partial mobilization" in September 2022, with Russians responding with howls of opposition. The government quickly backed off of the effort, informing many that their call-up orders were issued by "mistake". Since then, Russia has relied on mercenary groups and lucrative payouts to make the "golden handshake" in exchange for military service in Ukraine. Even these enticements are proving to be insufficient for the Kremlin's manpower needs.
By providing fresh troops to Russia, North Korea will likely help to backfill some, but not all, of Moscow's gaps. US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin warned the news is a "very, very serious issue", but cautioned that the precise contribution of Pyongyang's troops remained unknown. For the Kim regime, support for Russia has many strategic benefits and few risks. First, protection from United Nations sanctions. Russia has used its Security Council veto to repeatedly shield North Korea from international monitoring and penalties for its prohibited missile tests and nuclear weapons development. Second, a security guarantee from the world's largest nuclear power. This summer, Moscow and Pyongyang agreed to a NATO-style mutual defense pledge, promising to aid each other in the event of war. Third, North Korea's troops will gain valuable combat experience if they survive. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the Kim regime will likely benefit from Russian technology transfers that could greatly accelerate its missile and nuclear programs.
In exchange, the costs to North Korea are a pittance. An expeditionary force of roughly 12,000 soldiers is small potatoes compared to Kim's million-man army. His related shipments of around three million artillery shells to Russia is also a small fraction of his total stockpile. The danger to Ukraine is great, however, with a senior Ukrainian official stating that the addition of North Korean artillery on the battlefield has been "much worse than the Shaheds", the Iranian-designed kamikaze drones that Russia is using to pound Kyiv's troops and infrastructure.
Elon Musk's Alleged Ties with Vladimir Putin
Elon Musk is accused of having close ties with Vladimir Putin, withholding Starlink access from Taiwan as a favour to China. The Wall Street Journal reported that Putin asked Musk to withhold Starlink from Taiwan as a favour to China's Xi Jinping, with unnamed officials stating that Musk has been in regular contact with Putin since 2022. The Journal reported that in late 2023, Musk received his first request from the Kremlin to refrain from activating Starlink over Taiwan, citing a former Russian intelligence officer. The request was made for Beijing's sake, as Moscow increasingly relied on trade from China. Based on The Journal's findings, it's unclear exactly how many times Putin or his administration asked Musk for the favour.
The Chinese embassy in Washington told The Journal that it was not aware of the specifics of this arrangement, and did not respond to a separate request for comment sent outside regular business hours by Business Insider. Taiwan does not have official Starlink access because its laws require satellite services to be provided through a joint venture with a local operator that maintains majority ownership. The New York Times reported that SpaceX was unwilling to accept such an arrangement, and the self-governed island is thus creating its own low-earth orbit satellite network. Musk's reported conversations with Putin coincide with his apparent shift in rhetoric toward Ukraine in late 2022. Until that point, the billionaire had vocally supported Kyiv, providing it with 15,000 Starlink terminals.
In October of that year, he began seeking funding from the Pentagon to continue the free services, tweeting that they were taking a financial toll. Musk also tweeted a poll that month about a peace plan reflecting some of Russia's war demands at the time, including Russia's formal obtaining of Crimea and a guarantee of Ukraine's neutrality. The billionaire's post drew the fury of pro-Ukrainian accounts, but he added that he only suggested those measures to avoid further death in Ukraine and the risk of nuclear war. "Obviously, we are pro-Ukraine", he tweeted, saying that SpaceX had spent about $80 million on free Starlink for Ukraine. Two weeks later, Ian Bremmer, a political scientist who founded Eurasia Group, wrote in an email to his subscribers that Musk had spoken with Putin before tweeting this controversial peace plan. Per Bremmer, Putin had told Musk that if he could not accomplish his goals in Ukraine, he would turn to "major escalation". Musk and the Kremlin said Bremmer's report was untrue.
The allegations present awkward implications for the US, with Musk's SpaceX holding defense and space contracts with the Pentagon and NASA. An analysis published on Monday by The New York Times reported that the company has $3.6 billion in contracts with the Defense Department — primarily for launching American satellites into orbit — and $11.8 billion with NASA. Russian forces were reported to be buying up Starlink terminals earlier this year to help their invasion of Ukraine. The system has been vital to Ukrainian forces over the two-year conflict. But Russian agents are reportedly now using 'intermediaries' in Dubai in order to get their hands on the terminals, circumventing western sanctions imposed on Russia. House Democrats warned that Russia's use of the system in Ukraine could raise national security concerns in March. In a letter to SpaceX, two Democrats on the House Oversight Committee demanded information about Russia's potential illegal acquisition of the satellite-enabled terminals, according to the Washington Post. The letter cited recent allegations from Ukrainian intelligence officials, who say that Russian troops are using Starlink terminals to coordinate war efforts in eastern Ukraine, in potential violation of US sanctions.
As founder of SpaceX, Musk has cultivated close ties with US military and intelligence, with access to sensitive information. The company is the primary rocket launcher for both NASA and the Pentagon. Starlink has said it does not do any business in or with Russia, and Musk has branded claims of association with Putin "absurd". Dmitry Peskov, spokesperson for the Kremlin, insisted neither Putin nor the Kremlin were in regular contact with Musk. Musk has not yet commented on the claims published in the WSJ. The Kremlin today slammed the claims in the WSJ report as "not true" and "absolutely false". While Beijing remains officially neutral on the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, it has supported Putin's claims that the war was provoked by western aggression. The US this month imposed its first sanctions on Chinese firms for making weapons for Russia, accusing them of collaborating with Russian defence firms to produce drones vital to the war effort.
US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen Announces New Sanctions
US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announced new sanctions targeting secondary entities in countries supplying Russia with critical items for its military. Yellen told world financial leaders gathered in Washington for annual meetings of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank that "We will unveil strong new sanctions targeting those facilitating the Kremlin's war machine, including intermediaries in third countries that are supplying Russia with critical inputs for its military". The IMF and World Bank meetings mark the last major international finance gathering to be held during President Joe Biden's administration and come as the state of the economy and inflation are top concerns for American voters. The presidential election between the Republican party nominee, former President Donald Trump, and Democratic party nominee Vice President Kamala Harris is slated to be decided on November 5, with the outcome expected to have an enormous impact on global finance and the world's economy.
Yellen touched on the use of the proceeds from frozen Russian sovereign assets to provide loans for Ukraine. As she spoke, the European Parliament approved a loan of up to 35 billion euros ($38 billion) for Ukraine's defense and reconstruction that will be repaid using future revenues from Russian central bank assets frozen abroad. Yellen referred to the overall $50 billion loan package being negotiated by the Group of Seven and EU allies, saying the United States expects to be able to contribute $20 billion. The U.S. Treasury Department is "working tirelessly to unlock the economic value of frozen Russian sovereign assets to aid Ukraine", Yellen said. Earlier on October 22, Britain announced its readiness to provide Ukraine with a loan of<co: 2>Earlier on October 22, Britain announced its readiness to provide Ukraine with a loan of
Further Reading:
As North Korea, Iran and China support Russia’s war, is a ‘new axis’ emerging? - CNN
If South Korea decides to get involved in Ukraine, it has powerful options - Business Insider
Israel launches retaliatory strike on Iran - Financial Times
Lukashenko warns of war if Russia attempts to annex Belarus - RBC-Ukraine
North Korea’s troops reveal Putin’s Ukraine pickle — no more cannon fodder - New York Post
Putin 'asked Elon Musk to switch off internet over Taiwan as a favour to China' - Daily Mail
Vance says it is Ukraine's decision to end the war - NBC News
Vladimir Putin signals North Korean troops are in Russia - Financial Times
Themes around the World:
Volatilidade macro, juros e câmbio
Inflação (IPCA-15) surpreendeu e o Copom sinaliza início de cortes da Selic, hoje alta, enquanto projeções apontam Selic de 12% no fim de 2026 e câmbio perto de R$5,42. Para importadores/exportadores, aumenta risco de hedge e custo de capital.
Critical minerals value-adding race
Canberra is pushing beyond “dig and ship” via onshore refining and R&D, including a A$53m Critical Metals CRC leveraged by A$185m partner funding, plus strategic stockpiling. Competition from China’s low-cost processing and outbound investment pressures project economics and partnering strategies.
FDI screening may partially ease
Government is reviewing Press Note 3 (FDI from bordering countries) and considering a de minimis threshold for small-ticket approvals, while keeping the regime intact. This could accelerate venture funding and JVs, but leaves heightened national-security scrutiny and deal-timing uncertainty.
China export curbs escalate
Beijing’s dual‑use export restrictions and watchlists targeting 40 Japanese entities (including major defense/aerospace groups) heighten compliance risk, disrupt critical‑mineral inputs, and accelerate diversification away from China in sourcing, sales, and JV planning.
Tightened UK sanctions enforcement
The UK is expanding Russia sanctions with a near-300-item package, targeting Transneft (moves over 80% of Russian crude exports), 48 “shadow fleet” tankers, banks and intermediaries. Firms face higher compliance, shipping/insurance exposure, and elevated secondary‑risk screening burdens.
BOJ tightening and yen volatility
With policy rates at 0.75% and debate over March/April hikes amid political pressure and Middle East shocks, the yen remains volatile. FX swings affect import costs, pricing, hedging, and valuation of Japan-based earnings and M&A.
Critical minerals alliances surge
Canada is accelerating critical-mininerals diplomacy and project financing, announcing 30 new partnerships and $12.1B in mobilized project capital (total $18.5B). This strengthens allied supply chains for defense and clean tech, but raises permitting, ESG, and Indigenous engagement demands.
War-driven FX and rates
Regional conflict triggered heavy FX intervention (about $12B in one week) and emergency liquidity tightening; overnight rates neared 40% and repo auctions were suspended. Expect higher hedging costs, payment volatility, and tighter working-capital conditions for importers and leveraged firms.
Hormuz security and war risk
Conflict-driven threats around the Strait of Hormuz are disrupting traffic, with vessels attacked and war-risk cover withdrawn by major P&I clubs. Higher premiums, rerouting, and delays raise landed costs for energy and all Gulf-linked cargo, complicating scheduling and inventory planning.
Tighter rules-of-origin, China screening
Washington is pushing stricter rules-of-origin, stronger audits, and measures to prevent Chinese inputs or ‘backdoor’ exports via Mexico. Automotive proposals include raising regional content (e.g., 75% toward 85%) and adding U.S.-content thresholds, increasing sourcing costs and documentation burdens.
Trade deficit, import mix shifts
February exports rose 1.6% y/y to ~$21.1B while imports rose 6.1% to ~$30.3B, widening the deficit 18.1% to ~$9.2B; gold/silver drove imports as energy imports fell 16.6%. Expect policy attention on import compression, duties, and FX demand management.
Mega-project FDI and real estate
Ras El Hekma and other Gulf-backed developments are advancing with large-scale infrastructure, hospitality, and industrial zones. These projects can improve hard-currency buffers and contractor pipelines but also concentrate execution, land, and permitting risk; supply chains should monitor local content and payment terms.
FX volatility and capital flows
Geopolitical shocks have driven large foreign equity outflows and Taiwan-dollar weakness, with swaps pricing possible rate hikes. Currency swings affect import costs, hedging needs, and cross-border earnings translation, while tighter monetary conditions can lift borrowing costs for corporates.
Schuldenbremse, Haushalt, Investitionsstau
Koalitionsstreit um die Schuldenbremse bremst Planungssicherheit für Infrastruktur, Energie- und Verteidigungsinvestitionen. Unsicherheit über zusätzliche Kreditspielräume beeinflusst Förderprogramme, öffentliche Aufträge und Standortkosten. Unternehmen müssen mit verzögerten Projekten, schwankenden CAPEX-Anreizen und politischem Risiko kalkulieren.
Global AI-chip export licensing
Draft rules would require US approval for most global exports of advanced AI accelerators (Nvidia/AMD), with thresholds, monitoring, and even site visits; very large deployments may require government assurances and US investment commitments. Data-center, cloud, and OEM plans face delays and redesigns.
Port-rail bottlenecks and inland logistics
Gateway congestion and single-point failures threaten export reliability. Vancouver handled 85M+ tonnes in H1 2025 (+~13% y/y), but rising dwell times and aging infrastructure (e.g., Second Narrows bridge) expose grain, minerals and container supply chains to delays and higher fees.
India–China trade imbalance, controls
India’s trade deficit with China remains large (around $99B in FY2024-25), while security-driven restrictions persist (apps, sensitive investments). Firms should expect continued scrutiny of China-linked ownership, sourcing, and tech partnerships, accelerating “China+1” diversification and localization.
ANPD vira agência reguladora forte
A ANPD ganhou status de agência reguladora, com mais autonomia para normatizar e fiscalizar a LGPD e o “ECA Digital”. A mudança tende a elevar exigências de governança de dados, incident response e compliance, com impacto direto em plataformas, e-commerce e BPOs.
US tariff framework uncertainty
Thailand faces shifting US tariff architecture: reciprocal frameworks may be upgraded, while baseline 10–15% global tariffs and product-specific duties persist. Firms should model duty scenarios, rules-of-origin compliance, and possible Section 301/232 actions affecting autos, metals, and sensitive sectors.
Workforce shocks and productivity constraints
Large reserve call-ups and security restrictions create acute labor gaps, especially for SMEs and operations requiring on-site work. Businesses report cancellations, reduced foot traffic, and mobility constraints; continuity planning must address remote-work capacity, redundancy in critical roles, and supplier payment stress.
China trade exposure and diversification
Australia’s trade remains highly exposed to China while geopolitics intensifies across energy, minerals, and security. Reports note China’s outbound critical-minerals push and an 85% fall in China FDI into Australia since 2018, accelerating diversification to G7/Indo-Pacific partners and reshaping market access.
Security threats to projects and staff
Persistent militant and insurgent violence, including attacks linked to major infrastructure corridors, elevates duty-of-care and insurance costs. Heightened security can delay site work, constrain travel, and raise risk premia for logistics, mining, and energy projects.
Choc énergétique Moyen-Orient et gaz
La guerre au Moyen-Orient a propulsé l’indice gaz européen de +65%, pesant sur industrie énergivore; Bercy anticipe une hausse dès mai pour contrats indexés (≈60% des abonnés), souvent <10€/mois. Risques: coûts, contrats, inflation et approvisionnement.
State footprint and privatization
IMF and markets continue pressing Cairo to reduce the state’s economic role and accelerate divestments. Uneven progress signals regulatory uncertainty for strategic sectors, potential competitive distortions, and shifting rules on licensing, local content, and pricing—key for FDI and PPP structuring.
Suez Canal rerouting shock
Red Sea insecurity and wider Middle East escalation are again diverting carriers around the Cape, slashing hard-currency inflows. Canal revenue fell from about $9.6bn (2023) to ~$3.6bn (2024), with officials citing ~$10bn cumulative losses.
Arctic LNG logistics under attack
Sanctioned Arctic LNG 2 depends on a small, aging carrier set, ship‑to‑ship transfers, and long reroutes. The sinking of a shadow LNG carrier and diversions around Suez raise tonne‑mile costs, delivery uncertainty, and counterparty risk for offtakers, shippers, and terminal operators.
Trade probes and ESG compliance
US Section 301 investigations into overcapacity and forced-labor enforcement now include Taiwan, increasing documentation and audit expectations. Exporters and multinationals face tighter supplier due diligence, origin tracing, and remediation obligations to protect market access and brand risk.
Tax, customs, and trade facilitation
Government is rolling out FY2026/27 tax reforms and customs changes to support industry and cut clearance times, including VAT tweaks and tariff adjustments. During disruptions, it granted a three-month ACI exemption for transit cargo, improving throughput for regional supply chains.
Industrial exports: autos and electronics
Thailand’s export engine is buoyed by AI/electronics demand, yet autos face softer overseas orders from tighter environmental rules (e.g., Australia) and conflict-driven shipping disruption. Export forecasts for 2026 range from -3.1% to +1.1%, raising planning uncertainty for suppliers.
Ports and logistics continuity
Haifa and other gateways remain strategic chokepoints during conflict, with elevated missile/drone risks and tighter security protocols. Even when operations continue, businesses should plan for congestion, rerouting, and stricter cargo screening affecting import-dependent production.
Nearshoring investment, capacity constraints
Manufacturing reinvestment continues, especially in northern hubs like Nuevo León (e.g., new automotive logistics/assembly capacity). But water stress, power reliability, permitting bottlenecks and security costs constrain ramp-ups, influencing site selection, capex timelines and supplier localization strategies.
Export competitiveness squeeze in textiles
Textiles face a severe downturn: 2025 exports just over €14bn, ~25% below 2022, with >4,500 firm closures and production shifts to Egypt. High wages, rates, and a defended lira erode competitiveness, affecting sourcing decisions and supplier resilience.
Hormuz disruption and war risk
Conflict has slashed Strait of Hormuz traffic from roughly 100–135 daily transits to about 89 ships in March 1–15, with ~20 vessels attacked. Selective passage and soaring insurance elevate freight costs, delays, and force rerouting for Gulf-linked supply chains.
Export logistics: Black Sea and Danube
Maritime access remains volatile as port strikes and naval risks raise freight, security, and insurance premiums. Firms diversify via Danube, rail, and EU “Solidarity Lanes,” but capacity bottlenecks and border friction can delay deliveries and complicate export contracts.
Private renewables investment legal clarity
A High Court ruling ordered Eskom to grant a wayleave for a 50MW mine solar plant, rejecting obstruction aimed at protecting utility revenue. With 2,300+ private facilities registered since 2018 (≈18GW), legal certainty improves for behind-the-meter and wheeling deals, but grid access and tariffs remain key risks.
War-driven fiscal and supply reorientation
Russia’s war economy prioritizes defense output and logistics resilience, while export patterns concentrate on China, India and Turkey (around 93% of seaborne crude). This reorientation changes market access, increases geopolitical conditionality in trade, and creates sudden regulatory barriers for Western firms.