Mission Grey Daily Brief - October 26, 2024
Summary of the Global Situation for Businesses and Investors
The war in Ukraine continues to dominate global affairs, with North Korean troops moving towards the frontline and Russian forces suffering record casualty rates. Elon Musk is accused of having close ties with Vladimir Putin, withholding Starlink access from Taiwan as a favour to China. US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announced new sanctions targeting secondary entities in countries supplying Russia with critical items for its military. Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko threatened war if Russia attempts to annex Belarus. South Korea is threatening to arm Ukraine in response to North Korea's support for Russia. Putin hosted the BRICS summit in Russia, praising its role as a counterbalance to the West's "perverse methods", and pushing for the creation of a new payment system as an alternative to the SWIFT network. Israel launched a retaliatory strike on Iran.
Russia's War in Ukraine
The war in Ukraine continues to be a major concern for businesses and investors, with the conflict entering its 975th day and Russian forces suffering record casualty rates. North Korean troops are moving towards the frontline, posing a significant threat to Ukraine's defence. Vladimir Putin is pulling Kim Jong Un deeper into the war, revealing a weakness in the Kremlin's ability to recruit troops at home. North Korea's infusion of fresh soldiers will remain practically risk-free for Pyongyang, unless the United States returns to its aggressive sanctions posture against the Kim regime. Russia is no stranger to employing foreign armies, with Cossack warriors famously fighting for the tsars in centuries past and the Red Army bolstering its ranks with Mongolian troops when it invaded China at the end of World War II. Today, the "TikTok soldiers" of Chechen warlord Ramzan Kadyrov are scattered across Ukraine's front lines.
After nearly three years of fighting, Putin is running low on cannon fodder. The Kremlin is finding it difficult and expensive to entice more of Russia's poor and desperate to sign up for the war, even with promises of bonuses and good pay. In theory, Moscow could force millions of its fighting-age men into the Ukrainian meat grinder through conscription, but this option is politically perilous. The Putin regime discovered the dangers of the draft when it briefly attempted a "partial mobilization" in September 2022, with Russians responding with howls of opposition. The government quickly backed off of the effort, informing many that their call-up orders were issued by "mistake". Since then, Russia has relied on mercenary groups and lucrative payouts to make the "golden handshake" in exchange for military service in Ukraine. Even these enticements are proving to be insufficient for the Kremlin's manpower needs.
By providing fresh troops to Russia, North Korea will likely help to backfill some, but not all, of Moscow's gaps. US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin warned the news is a "very, very serious issue", but cautioned that the precise contribution of Pyongyang's troops remained unknown. For the Kim regime, support for Russia has many strategic benefits and few risks. First, protection from United Nations sanctions. Russia has used its Security Council veto to repeatedly shield North Korea from international monitoring and penalties for its prohibited missile tests and nuclear weapons development. Second, a security guarantee from the world's largest nuclear power. This summer, Moscow and Pyongyang agreed to a NATO-style mutual defense pledge, promising to aid each other in the event of war. Third, North Korea's troops will gain valuable combat experience if they survive. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the Kim regime will likely benefit from Russian technology transfers that could greatly accelerate its missile and nuclear programs.
In exchange, the costs to North Korea are a pittance. An expeditionary force of roughly 12,000 soldiers is small potatoes compared to Kim's million-man army. His related shipments of around three million artillery shells to Russia is also a small fraction of his total stockpile. The danger to Ukraine is great, however, with a senior Ukrainian official stating that the addition of North Korean artillery on the battlefield has been "much worse than the Shaheds", the Iranian-designed kamikaze drones that Russia is using to pound Kyiv's troops and infrastructure.
Elon Musk's Alleged Ties with Vladimir Putin
Elon Musk is accused of having close ties with Vladimir Putin, withholding Starlink access from Taiwan as a favour to China. The Wall Street Journal reported that Putin asked Musk to withhold Starlink from Taiwan as a favour to China's Xi Jinping, with unnamed officials stating that Musk has been in regular contact with Putin since 2022. The Journal reported that in late 2023, Musk received his first request from the Kremlin to refrain from activating Starlink over Taiwan, citing a former Russian intelligence officer. The request was made for Beijing's sake, as Moscow increasingly relied on trade from China. Based on The Journal's findings, it's unclear exactly how many times Putin or his administration asked Musk for the favour.
The Chinese embassy in Washington told The Journal that it was not aware of the specifics of this arrangement, and did not respond to a separate request for comment sent outside regular business hours by Business Insider. Taiwan does not have official Starlink access because its laws require satellite services to be provided through a joint venture with a local operator that maintains majority ownership. The New York Times reported that SpaceX was unwilling to accept such an arrangement, and the self-governed island is thus creating its own low-earth orbit satellite network. Musk's reported conversations with Putin coincide with his apparent shift in rhetoric toward Ukraine in late 2022. Until that point, the billionaire had vocally supported Kyiv, providing it with 15,000 Starlink terminals.
In October of that year, he began seeking funding from the Pentagon to continue the free services, tweeting that they were taking a financial toll. Musk also tweeted a poll that month about a peace plan reflecting some of Russia's war demands at the time, including Russia's formal obtaining of Crimea and a guarantee of Ukraine's neutrality. The billionaire's post drew the fury of pro-Ukrainian accounts, but he added that he only suggested those measures to avoid further death in Ukraine and the risk of nuclear war. "Obviously, we are pro-Ukraine", he tweeted, saying that SpaceX had spent about $80 million on free Starlink for Ukraine. Two weeks later, Ian Bremmer, a political scientist who founded Eurasia Group, wrote in an email to his subscribers that Musk had spoken with Putin before tweeting this controversial peace plan. Per Bremmer, Putin had told Musk that if he could not accomplish his goals in Ukraine, he would turn to "major escalation". Musk and the Kremlin said Bremmer's report was untrue.
The allegations present awkward implications for the US, with Musk's SpaceX holding defense and space contracts with the Pentagon and NASA. An analysis published on Monday by The New York Times reported that the company has $3.6 billion in contracts with the Defense Department — primarily for launching American satellites into orbit — and $11.8 billion with NASA. Russian forces were reported to be buying up Starlink terminals earlier this year to help their invasion of Ukraine. The system has been vital to Ukrainian forces over the two-year conflict. But Russian agents are reportedly now using 'intermediaries' in Dubai in order to get their hands on the terminals, circumventing western sanctions imposed on Russia. House Democrats warned that Russia's use of the system in Ukraine could raise national security concerns in March. In a letter to SpaceX, two Democrats on the House Oversight Committee demanded information about Russia's potential illegal acquisition of the satellite-enabled terminals, according to the Washington Post. The letter cited recent allegations from Ukrainian intelligence officials, who say that Russian troops are using Starlink terminals to coordinate war efforts in eastern Ukraine, in potential violation of US sanctions.
As founder of SpaceX, Musk has cultivated close ties with US military and intelligence, with access to sensitive information. The company is the primary rocket launcher for both NASA and the Pentagon. Starlink has said it does not do any business in or with Russia, and Musk has branded claims of association with Putin "absurd". Dmitry Peskov, spokesperson for the Kremlin, insisted neither Putin nor the Kremlin were in regular contact with Musk. Musk has not yet commented on the claims published in the WSJ. The Kremlin today slammed the claims in the WSJ report as "not true" and "absolutely false". While Beijing remains officially neutral on the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, it has supported Putin's claims that the war was provoked by western aggression. The US this month imposed its first sanctions on Chinese firms for making weapons for Russia, accusing them of collaborating with Russian defence firms to produce drones vital to the war effort.
US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen Announces New Sanctions
US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announced new sanctions targeting secondary entities in countries supplying Russia with critical items for its military. Yellen told world financial leaders gathered in Washington for annual meetings of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank that "We will unveil strong new sanctions targeting those facilitating the Kremlin's war machine, including intermediaries in third countries that are supplying Russia with critical inputs for its military". The IMF and World Bank meetings mark the last major international finance gathering to be held during President Joe Biden's administration and come as the state of the economy and inflation are top concerns for American voters. The presidential election between the Republican party nominee, former President Donald Trump, and Democratic party nominee Vice President Kamala Harris is slated to be decided on November 5, with the outcome expected to have an enormous impact on global finance and the world's economy.
Yellen touched on the use of the proceeds from frozen Russian sovereign assets to provide loans for Ukraine. As she spoke, the European Parliament approved a loan of up to 35 billion euros ($38 billion) for Ukraine's defense and reconstruction that will be repaid using future revenues from Russian central bank assets frozen abroad. Yellen referred to the overall $50 billion loan package being negotiated by the Group of Seven and EU allies, saying the United States expects to be able to contribute $20 billion. The U.S. Treasury Department is "working tirelessly to unlock the economic value of frozen Russian sovereign assets to aid Ukraine", Yellen said. Earlier on October 22, Britain announced its readiness to provide Ukraine with a loan of<co: 2>Earlier on October 22, Britain announced its readiness to provide Ukraine with a loan of
Further Reading:
As North Korea, Iran and China support Russia’s war, is a ‘new axis’ emerging? - CNN
If South Korea decides to get involved in Ukraine, it has powerful options - Business Insider
Israel launches retaliatory strike on Iran - Financial Times
Lukashenko warns of war if Russia attempts to annex Belarus - RBC-Ukraine
North Korea’s troops reveal Putin’s Ukraine pickle — no more cannon fodder - New York Post
Putin 'asked Elon Musk to switch off internet over Taiwan as a favour to China' - Daily Mail
Vance says it is Ukraine's decision to end the war - NBC News
Vladimir Putin signals North Korean troops are in Russia - Financial Times
Themes around the World:
Semiconductor protectionism and reshoring
A targeted 25% tariff on certain advanced AI chips, coupled with Section 232 investigations and “tariff offset” concepts, aims to accelerate domestic capacity. Firms face higher component costs, potential broader duties on derivative products, and pressure to localize manufacturing and secure chip inputs.
Baht strength and financing conditions
The baht appreciated strongly in 2025 and stayed firm into 2026, pressuring export and tourism competitiveness while lowering import costs. With possible rate cuts but rising long-end yields, corporates face mixed funding conditions, FX hedging needs, and margin volatility.
Macroprudential tightening hits credit
BDDK and the central bank tightened consumer and FX-credit rules: card limits must align with documented income, unused high limits can be reduced, restructuring is capped, and FX-loan growth limits were cut to 0.5% over eight weeks. Expect tighter liquidity and financing.
Customs duty rebalancing on inputs
India is cutting tariffs on critical inputs (EV batteries, solar glass chemicals, rare-earth feedstocks like monazite) to reduce China dependence and protect exporters’ margins. Multinationals should reassess landed-cost models, rules-of-origin, and supplier localization roadmaps.
West Bank escalation and sanctions
Rising settler violence, expanded Israeli operations and growing international scrutiny increase risks of targeted sanctions, legal challenges and heightened compliance screening. Multinationals must reassess counterparties, project sites and procurement to avoid exposure to human-rights-related restrictions and activism-driven disruptions.
Foreign investment screening delays
FIRB/treasury foreign investment approvals remain slower and costlier, increasing execution risk for M&A and greenfield projects. Business groups report unpredictable milestones and missed statutory timelines, while fees have risen sharply (e.g., up to ~A$1.2m for >A$2bn investments), affecting deal economics.
Real Estate Transformation and Urbanization
India’s real estate market is projected to reach $1.26 trillion by 2034, driven by urbanization, infrastructure, and PropTech. Regulatory reforms like RERA and rising NRI investments are boosting transparency and investor confidence, with commercial and residential demand expanding in Tier-II cities.
Strategic Contest Over Port of Darwin
Australia’s push to reclaim the Chinese-leased Port of Darwin has provoked threats of economic retaliation from Beijing. The dispute highlights the intersection of national security and trade, with potential sanctions and investment restrictions affecting broader Australia-China commercial relations.
Port congestion and export delays
Transnet port underperformance—especially Cape Town—continues disrupting time-sensitive exports; fruit backlogs reportedly reached about R1bn, driven by wind stoppages, ageing cranes and staffing issues. Diversions to other ports add cost, extend lead times and raise spoilage risk.
New trade deals and friend-shoring
US is using reciprocal trade agreements to rewire supply chains toward strategic partners. The US–Taiwan deal caps many tariffs at 15%, links chip treatment to US investment, and includes large procurement and investment pledges, influencing regional manufacturing footprints and sourcing decisions.
Port labor and automation tensions
East/Gulf Coast port labor negotiations and disputes over automation remain a recurring tail risk for U.S. logistics. Even with tentative deals, threats of slowdowns or strikes can disrupt ocean schedules, raise demurrage, and push costly rerouting toward West Coast or air freight.
Dunkirk “Battery Valley” logistics advantage
Northern France is consolidating a “Battery Valley” around Dunkirk/Bourbourg with port and multimodal links, plus grid access near Gravelines nuclear plant. This can lower inbound materials and outbound cell transport costs, influencing site selection and supply-chain routing.
EV overcapacity and trade defenses
China’s EV, battery, and solar sectors face margin pressure from domestic overcapacity alongside expanding foreign trade defenses (anti-subsidy probes, local-content rules). Exporters and investors should expect higher tariffs, forced supply-chain restructuring, and increased scrutiny of subsidies and pricing.
Expanded Sanctions and Secondary Measures
Congress and the administration are widening sanctions tools, including efforts to target Russia’s ‘shadow fleet’ and a proposed 25% tariff penalty on countries trading with Iran. This raises counterparty, shipping, and insurance risk and increases compliance costs across global trade corridors.
Cross-border data and security controls
Data security enforcement and national-security framing continue to complicate cross-border transfers, cloud architecture, and vendor selection. Multinationals must design China-specific data stacks, strengthen incident reporting, and anticipate inspections affecting operations, R&D collaboration, and HR systems.
Rusya yaptırımları ve uyum riski
AB’nin Rus petrolüne yönelik yaptırımları sertleştirmeyi tartışması ve rafine ürünlerde dolaylı akışları hedeflemesi, Türkiye üzerinden ticarette uyum/itibar riskini artırıyor. Bankacılık, sigorta, denizcilik ve ihracatçıların “yeniden ihracat” kontrollerini güçlendirmesi gerekebilir.
Macroeconomic instability and FX collapse
The rial’s sharp depreciation and near-50% inflation erode purchasing power and raise operating costs. Importers face hard-currency scarcity, price controls, and ad hoc subsidies, complicating budgeting, wage management, and inventory planning for firms with local exposure or suppliers.
Domestic semiconductor substitution drive
Accelerating localization in semiconductor equipment and materials, alongside constraints on advanced foreign tools, is reshaping vendor ecosystems. Multinationals face procurement displacement, IP exposure, and evolving partnership terms, while China-based fabs prioritize domestic suppliers and capacity.
Infrastructure Expansion And Connectivity
Major investments in expressways, airports, and logistics hubs are underway, targeting 5,000 km of expressways by 2030. Improved transport infrastructure is expected to boost regional integration, reduce logistics costs, and enhance supply chain resilience for international businesses.
Investment screening and security controls
National-security policy is increasingly embedded in commerce through CFIUS-style scrutiny, export controls, and sectoral investigations (chips, critical minerals). Cross-border M&A, greenfield projects, and technology partnerships face longer timelines, higher disclosure burdens, and deal-structure constraints to mitigate control risks.
IMF programme and macro conditionality
Late-February IMF review will determine release of a $1bn EFF tranche, shaping FX reserves, taxation, privatisation and monetary policy. Policy slippage risks renewed import controls, payment delays and currency volatility that directly affect trade finance and investor confidence.
Sanctions Enforcement Targets Russian Oil
France’s aggressive enforcement of sanctions against Russia’s shadow oil fleet, including high-profile tanker seizures, heightens geopolitical risk in maritime trade. This robust stance, coordinated with allies, may provoke Russian retaliation and impact global energy supply chains.
Escalating Australia-China Trade Tensions
Australia is considering tariffs and quotas on Chinese steel imports to protect domestic industry, risking renewed trade hostilities with China. Such measures could trigger retaliatory actions, impacting sectors reliant on Chinese markets and complicating bilateral investment flows.
Natural gas expansion, export pathways
Offshore gas output remains a strategic stabilizer; new long-term contracts and export infrastructure (including links to Egypt) advance regional energy trade. For industry, this supports power reliability and petrochemicals, but geopolitical interruptions and regulatory directives can still trigger temporary shutdowns.
Yen volatility and intervention risk
Sharp yen swings, repeated “rate-check” signals, and explicit MoU-backed intervention warnings increase FX and hedging risk. Policy signals after the election and BOJ normalization drive volatility, directly affecting import costs, pricing, and earnings repatriation.
Rare earths processing and project pipeline
Government promotion of 49 mines and 29 processing projects, plus discoveries in gallium/scandium and magnet rare earths, supports Australia’s shift from raw exports to midstream processing. Opportunities are significant, but permitting, capex, and processing technology risk remain decisive.
BEG subsidies and budget risk
Federal BEG/BAFA support is critical to Wärmewende economics, but annual budget ceilings and frequent program adjustments create stop‑start ordering behavior. International suppliers face higher payment-cycle uncertainty, while investors must model demand cliffs, compliance documentation, and administrative throughput constraints.
Export Competitiveness Through Institutional Reform
Budget 2026 prioritizes regulatory streamlining, customs modernization, and logistics upgrades to boost export competitiveness. Institutional reforms now outweigh tariff cuts, lowering policy risk and enabling Indian exporters to navigate global supply chain disruptions more effectively.
B40 biodiesel mandate impacts fuels
Indonesia will maintain the B40 palm-based biodiesel mandate through 2026 under PP No. 40/2025, after saving an estimated Rp720 trillion in FX and cutting ~228 million tons CO2 (2015–2025). Higher domestic palm demand can tighten CPO export availability and price volatility.
Data privacy and surveillance constraints
Growing scrutiny of government and commercial data collection is increasing compliance and reputational risk, especially for data brokers, adtech, and cross-border data users. Senators allege ICE buys location and other sensitive data from brokers; efforts to revive the “Fourth Amendment Is Not for Sale Act” could tighten rules.
Lira Volatility and FX Liquidity
Structurally weak long-term capital inflows and limited buffers keep USD/TRY risk elevated, raising import costs and FX debt-service burdens. Market surveys still price ~51–52 USD/TRY horizons, implying ongoing hedging needs, tighter treasury controls, and higher working-capital requirements for import-dependent sectors.
China-exposure and strategic asset scrutiny
Beijing warned of potential retaliation over proposals to return Darwin Port from a Chinese lessee, highlighting renewed geopolitics around strategic infrastructure. Firms with China-linked ownership, customers or supply chains face higher political, reputational and contract risks, alongside tighter investment screening.
Stablecoins and payments disintermediation
Rapid stablecoin growth threatens to siphon deposits from banks (estimates up to $500bn by 2028 in developed markets) and disrupt fee income. For corporates, faster settlement may help, but deposit outflows can weaken regional lenders’ credit provision and liquidity buffers.
Green Transition and Sustainable Investment Projects
Major projects like the $4.2 billion Giza waste-to-biofuel facility highlight Egypt’s commitment to green growth and the circular economy. Such initiatives create new investment opportunities, support job creation, and align with global sustainability standards, attracting ESG-focused investors.
Surge in Foreign Direct Investment Inflows
Foreign investment in Germany more than doubled to €96 billion in 2025, reflecting confidence in its stability, legal certainty, and EU market access. This trend strengthens Germany’s position as a European business hub, but also increases scrutiny on strategic sectors and regulatory frameworks.
Geopolitical risk: Taiwan routes
Persistent Taiwan Strait tensions elevate insurance premiums, rerouting risk, and contingency planning needs for shipping and air freight. A crisis would disrupt semiconductor-linked supply chains and regional production networks, prompting customers to demand dual-sourcing and higher inventories.