Mission Grey Daily Brief - October 26, 2024
Summary of the Global Situation for Businesses and Investors
The war in Ukraine continues to dominate global affairs, with North Korean troops moving towards the frontline and Russian forces suffering record casualty rates. Elon Musk is accused of having close ties with Vladimir Putin, withholding Starlink access from Taiwan as a favour to China. US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announced new sanctions targeting secondary entities in countries supplying Russia with critical items for its military. Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko threatened war if Russia attempts to annex Belarus. South Korea is threatening to arm Ukraine in response to North Korea's support for Russia. Putin hosted the BRICS summit in Russia, praising its role as a counterbalance to the West's "perverse methods", and pushing for the creation of a new payment system as an alternative to the SWIFT network. Israel launched a retaliatory strike on Iran.
Russia's War in Ukraine
The war in Ukraine continues to be a major concern for businesses and investors, with the conflict entering its 975th day and Russian forces suffering record casualty rates. North Korean troops are moving towards the frontline, posing a significant threat to Ukraine's defence. Vladimir Putin is pulling Kim Jong Un deeper into the war, revealing a weakness in the Kremlin's ability to recruit troops at home. North Korea's infusion of fresh soldiers will remain practically risk-free for Pyongyang, unless the United States returns to its aggressive sanctions posture against the Kim regime. Russia is no stranger to employing foreign armies, with Cossack warriors famously fighting for the tsars in centuries past and the Red Army bolstering its ranks with Mongolian troops when it invaded China at the end of World War II. Today, the "TikTok soldiers" of Chechen warlord Ramzan Kadyrov are scattered across Ukraine's front lines.
After nearly three years of fighting, Putin is running low on cannon fodder. The Kremlin is finding it difficult and expensive to entice more of Russia's poor and desperate to sign up for the war, even with promises of bonuses and good pay. In theory, Moscow could force millions of its fighting-age men into the Ukrainian meat grinder through conscription, but this option is politically perilous. The Putin regime discovered the dangers of the draft when it briefly attempted a "partial mobilization" in September 2022, with Russians responding with howls of opposition. The government quickly backed off of the effort, informing many that their call-up orders were issued by "mistake". Since then, Russia has relied on mercenary groups and lucrative payouts to make the "golden handshake" in exchange for military service in Ukraine. Even these enticements are proving to be insufficient for the Kremlin's manpower needs.
By providing fresh troops to Russia, North Korea will likely help to backfill some, but not all, of Moscow's gaps. US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin warned the news is a "very, very serious issue", but cautioned that the precise contribution of Pyongyang's troops remained unknown. For the Kim regime, support for Russia has many strategic benefits and few risks. First, protection from United Nations sanctions. Russia has used its Security Council veto to repeatedly shield North Korea from international monitoring and penalties for its prohibited missile tests and nuclear weapons development. Second, a security guarantee from the world's largest nuclear power. This summer, Moscow and Pyongyang agreed to a NATO-style mutual defense pledge, promising to aid each other in the event of war. Third, North Korea's troops will gain valuable combat experience if they survive. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the Kim regime will likely benefit from Russian technology transfers that could greatly accelerate its missile and nuclear programs.
In exchange, the costs to North Korea are a pittance. An expeditionary force of roughly 12,000 soldiers is small potatoes compared to Kim's million-man army. His related shipments of around three million artillery shells to Russia is also a small fraction of his total stockpile. The danger to Ukraine is great, however, with a senior Ukrainian official stating that the addition of North Korean artillery on the battlefield has been "much worse than the Shaheds", the Iranian-designed kamikaze drones that Russia is using to pound Kyiv's troops and infrastructure.
Elon Musk's Alleged Ties with Vladimir Putin
Elon Musk is accused of having close ties with Vladimir Putin, withholding Starlink access from Taiwan as a favour to China. The Wall Street Journal reported that Putin asked Musk to withhold Starlink from Taiwan as a favour to China's Xi Jinping, with unnamed officials stating that Musk has been in regular contact with Putin since 2022. The Journal reported that in late 2023, Musk received his first request from the Kremlin to refrain from activating Starlink over Taiwan, citing a former Russian intelligence officer. The request was made for Beijing's sake, as Moscow increasingly relied on trade from China. Based on The Journal's findings, it's unclear exactly how many times Putin or his administration asked Musk for the favour.
The Chinese embassy in Washington told The Journal that it was not aware of the specifics of this arrangement, and did not respond to a separate request for comment sent outside regular business hours by Business Insider. Taiwan does not have official Starlink access because its laws require satellite services to be provided through a joint venture with a local operator that maintains majority ownership. The New York Times reported that SpaceX was unwilling to accept such an arrangement, and the self-governed island is thus creating its own low-earth orbit satellite network. Musk's reported conversations with Putin coincide with his apparent shift in rhetoric toward Ukraine in late 2022. Until that point, the billionaire had vocally supported Kyiv, providing it with 15,000 Starlink terminals.
In October of that year, he began seeking funding from the Pentagon to continue the free services, tweeting that they were taking a financial toll. Musk also tweeted a poll that month about a peace plan reflecting some of Russia's war demands at the time, including Russia's formal obtaining of Crimea and a guarantee of Ukraine's neutrality. The billionaire's post drew the fury of pro-Ukrainian accounts, but he added that he only suggested those measures to avoid further death in Ukraine and the risk of nuclear war. "Obviously, we are pro-Ukraine", he tweeted, saying that SpaceX had spent about $80 million on free Starlink for Ukraine. Two weeks later, Ian Bremmer, a political scientist who founded Eurasia Group, wrote in an email to his subscribers that Musk had spoken with Putin before tweeting this controversial peace plan. Per Bremmer, Putin had told Musk that if he could not accomplish his goals in Ukraine, he would turn to "major escalation". Musk and the Kremlin said Bremmer's report was untrue.
The allegations present awkward implications for the US, with Musk's SpaceX holding defense and space contracts with the Pentagon and NASA. An analysis published on Monday by The New York Times reported that the company has $3.6 billion in contracts with the Defense Department — primarily for launching American satellites into orbit — and $11.8 billion with NASA. Russian forces were reported to be buying up Starlink terminals earlier this year to help their invasion of Ukraine. The system has been vital to Ukrainian forces over the two-year conflict. But Russian agents are reportedly now using 'intermediaries' in Dubai in order to get their hands on the terminals, circumventing western sanctions imposed on Russia. House Democrats warned that Russia's use of the system in Ukraine could raise national security concerns in March. In a letter to SpaceX, two Democrats on the House Oversight Committee demanded information about Russia's potential illegal acquisition of the satellite-enabled terminals, according to the Washington Post. The letter cited recent allegations from Ukrainian intelligence officials, who say that Russian troops are using Starlink terminals to coordinate war efforts in eastern Ukraine, in potential violation of US sanctions.
As founder of SpaceX, Musk has cultivated close ties with US military and intelligence, with access to sensitive information. The company is the primary rocket launcher for both NASA and the Pentagon. Starlink has said it does not do any business in or with Russia, and Musk has branded claims of association with Putin "absurd". Dmitry Peskov, spokesperson for the Kremlin, insisted neither Putin nor the Kremlin were in regular contact with Musk. Musk has not yet commented on the claims published in the WSJ. The Kremlin today slammed the claims in the WSJ report as "not true" and "absolutely false". While Beijing remains officially neutral on the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, it has supported Putin's claims that the war was provoked by western aggression. The US this month imposed its first sanctions on Chinese firms for making weapons for Russia, accusing them of collaborating with Russian defence firms to produce drones vital to the war effort.
US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen Announces New Sanctions
US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announced new sanctions targeting secondary entities in countries supplying Russia with critical items for its military. Yellen told world financial leaders gathered in Washington for annual meetings of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank that "We will unveil strong new sanctions targeting those facilitating the Kremlin's war machine, including intermediaries in third countries that are supplying Russia with critical inputs for its military". The IMF and World Bank meetings mark the last major international finance gathering to be held during President Joe Biden's administration and come as the state of the economy and inflation are top concerns for American voters. The presidential election between the Republican party nominee, former President Donald Trump, and Democratic party nominee Vice President Kamala Harris is slated to be decided on November 5, with the outcome expected to have an enormous impact on global finance and the world's economy.
Yellen touched on the use of the proceeds from frozen Russian sovereign assets to provide loans for Ukraine. As she spoke, the European Parliament approved a loan of up to 35 billion euros ($38 billion) for Ukraine's defense and reconstruction that will be repaid using future revenues from Russian central bank assets frozen abroad. Yellen referred to the overall $50 billion loan package being negotiated by the Group of Seven and EU allies, saying the United States expects to be able to contribute $20 billion. The U.S. Treasury Department is "working tirelessly to unlock the economic value of frozen Russian sovereign assets to aid Ukraine", Yellen said. Earlier on October 22, Britain announced its readiness to provide Ukraine with a loan of<co: 2>Earlier on October 22, Britain announced its readiness to provide Ukraine with a loan of
Further Reading:
As North Korea, Iran and China support Russia’s war, is a ‘new axis’ emerging? - CNN
If South Korea decides to get involved in Ukraine, it has powerful options - Business Insider
Israel launches retaliatory strike on Iran - Financial Times
Lukashenko warns of war if Russia attempts to annex Belarus - RBC-Ukraine
North Korea’s troops reveal Putin’s Ukraine pickle — no more cannon fodder - New York Post
Putin 'asked Elon Musk to switch off internet over Taiwan as a favour to China' - Daily Mail
Vance says it is Ukraine's decision to end the war - NBC News
Vladimir Putin signals North Korean troops are in Russia - Financial Times
Themes around the World:
Logistics corridors and customs acceleration
Saudi launched logistics corridors with Mawani and ZATCA to redirect containers from eastern/GCC ports to Jeddah and other Red Sea ports, leveraging transit and bonded warehouses. Red Sea port capacity exceeds 18.6m TEU annually, supporting continuity but potentially shifting inland transport and warehousing demand.
Tourism weakness hitting demand
Tourism, worth about 20% of GDP, remains vulnerable as higher airfares and Middle East-related rerouting weigh on arrivals. International visitors reached 7.49 million by March 11, down 4.4% year on year, affecting consumer demand, retail activity and services investment.
Rail market liberalisation reforms logistics
Competition is expanding in passenger rail, with Trenitalia on Paris–Marseille and Transdev operating Marseille–Nice after tendering. Service frequency and investment are rising, but labour tensions and fragmented ticketing illustrate transition risk, affecting mobility planning for firms and staff.
Korea-China supply chain recalibration
Seoul and Beijing resumed industry-minister talks focused on stabilizing battery and semiconductor supply chains, creating hotlines for logistics disruptions and exploring fast-track access to items like rare earths and permanent magnets. Firms must manage export-control uncertainty and China-operations continuity.
US-Japan economic-security deepening
Tokyo’s summit agenda with Washington spans a $550bn US investment pledge, joint shipbuilding, nuclear/gas projects, and potential “Golden Dome” missile-defense cooperation. Outcomes could shape tariffs, localization choices, and access to US contracts across energy, defense, and industry.
Political-legal uncertainty and resilience
Policy remains highly reactive to security and market shocks, with sudden liquidity moves and border measures. This unpredictability can affect licensing, customs throughput, tax measures (e.g., fuel-tax adjustments), and dispute risk, requiring stronger contractual protections and scenario planning.
Nuclear revival reshapes energy
France is accelerating a nuclear-led energy strategy—new EPR2 builds and SMR/mini-reactor funding—to secure reliable low‑carbon power and industrial competitiveness. Supply-chain implications include uranium enrichment diversification away from Russia and large capex opportunities for contractors.
US tariff reset, FTA acceleration
US tariffs shifting to a 15% uniform rate for 150 days narrows Thailand’s disadvantage (previously ~19% on some goods), encouraging shipment front-loading. Thailand is accelerating FTAs (EU, Korea, ASEAN-Canada), reshaping market access and sourcing strategies.
Defense buildup reshapes industry
Rapidly rising defense outlays and nuclear-deterrence modernization are expanding procurement opportunities and export pipelines, while increasing compliance and security requirements for suppliers. France plans sizable additional defense funding, with deterrence already about 13% of defense spending.
Germany–China ties, rising scrutiny
Germany is deepening commercial engagement with China—new German FDI reportedly ~€7bn in 2025—alongside growing strategic concerns. Firms face a balancing act: access to China’s innovation ecosystem versus elevated geopolitical, compliance, export-control, and potential investment-screening risks.
IMF Programme and Fiscal Tightening
Delayed IMF staff-level agreement keeps a $1bn tranche uncertain, raising rollover and reserve risks. Likely spending cuts, tax hikes and governance conditions will affect demand, pricing, import capacity and investor confidence, influencing deal timing and payment risk.
Hydrogen import corridors scale up
Japan is building long-horizon clean-fuel supply chains, exemplified by the Japan–New Zealand Hydrogen Corridor studying green hydrogen production and export logistics from FY2026, targeting early-2030s imports. Impacts include port infrastructure, shipping tech, and new contracting models.
Payments, banking, and settlement fragmentation
With many banks sanctioned, Russia’s cross‑border payments remain routed through a patchwork of intermediaries and non‑Western currencies. Settlement delays, FX conversion costs, and sudden bank designations complicate trade finance, profit repatriation, and treasury operations for firms with Russia exposure.
Power-Sector Reform and Reliability
IMF-linked requirements to curb circular debt and limit subsidies drive tariff increases and restructuring of distribution companies. This elevates operating costs and creates outage risk. Investors must model power-price volatility, payment discipline and contract enforceability in energy-intensive sectors.
Macro volatility: weak won, oil inflation
A sharply weaker won and oil-price shock are lifting import costs; Korea’s import price index rose 1.1% m/m in February, while USD/KRW tested post-crisis highs. The Bank of Korea is constrained on rate cuts, increasing financing and hedging complexity for foreign investors.
Energy export expansion and price shocks
U.S. LNG export authorizations are rising, while Middle East conflict risk has recently lifted oil/gas prices, strengthening the dollar and pressuring global input costs. Energy-intensive sectors face margin risk, and buyers must reassess long-term LNG contracting, shipping, and geopolitical contingency plans.
AI Infrastructure Cost Inflation
Rapid growth in AI infrastructure is driving broader cost inflation beyond technology hardware. Electricity prices have risen 42% since 2019, data centers may intensify cross-subsidy disputes, and utilities are reconsidering rate designs, affecting industrial competitiveness, real estate strategy, and regional operating expenses.
Energy-price shock exposure via gas
Despite power resilience, France remains exposed to gas-market spikes through indexed contracts and industrial feedstock costs. Around 60% of gas subscribers are on indexed offers; Bercy expects impacts from May, typically under €10/month for households, but higher for energy-intensive firms.
Migration rules tighten for settlement
Government proposes extending Indefinite Leave to Remain from five to 10 years, potentially applied retrospectively, with higher English and tax-history requirements but fast tracks for top earners and NHS roles. Talent attraction, staffing costs, and project continuity risks rise for internationally mobile employers.
Textile Export Competitiveness Pressure
Textiles generate about 60% of Pakistan’s exports and employ over 15 million workers, but rising energy costs, customs delays and freight uncertainty are eroding competitiveness. Industry groups warn orders are shifting to Bangladesh, India, Vietnam and Turkey.
Ports, roads and logistics competitiveness
Cai Mep–Thi Vai handled 711,429 TEU in Jan 2026 (+9% y/y) with >20 direct US/EU mainline services. New links—Bien Hoa–Vung Tau Expressway (Q2 2026) and Phuoc An Bridge (2027)—should cut truck times to 45–60 minutes, lowering landed costs.
Kharg Island and energy infrastructure
Kharg Island remains the core crude export hub; strikes have focused on military targets while leaving storage and loading largely intact (satellite checks show 55 tanks intact). Any escalation to energy infrastructure could abruptly remove >1 million bpd and shock global prices.
Wartime Fiscal Deterioration
The government added roughly NIS 32 billion to the 2026 budget, lifted the deficit ceiling to 5.1% of GDP and raised defense spending to about NIS 143 billion, increasing sovereign-risk concerns, public borrowing needs and possible future tax pressure.
Suez Canal rerouting risks
Regional conflict has cut Suez Canal revenues by about $10bn since 2020; experts cite ~50% traffic decline during the Iran war and carrier suspensions. Higher war‑risk insurance and diversions via Cape routes raise lead times, freight costs and contract uncertainty.
Middle East shock, fuel-price volatility
The Iran war is pushing up oil, fuel and gas prices, reviving Germany’s energy-security and inflation risks. Policymakers debate using strategic reserves and stronger price monitoring. Higher transport and input costs can quickly ripple through German-centric European supply chains.
IMF programme and fiscal conditionality
IMF review delays and tougher fiscal targets (primary surplus, tax collection) keep disbursements uncertain, shaping FX liquidity and sovereign risk. Businesses face volatile taxation, subsidy rollback risk, and slower approvals for privatisation and governance reforms affecting market entry.
Political transition and policy continuity
Election results have been certified, enabling parliament to convene and a new coalition to form by April. Near-term regulatory and budget priorities may shift under a Bhumjaithai-led cabinet, affecting investor confidence, public spending timelines and sector policy execution.
Higher-for-longer rates and strong dollar
Sticky inflation and war-driven energy risks are delaying Fed cuts, supporting a stronger dollar and higher hedging costs. This affects trade financing, emerging-market demand, and USD-priced commodities, while compressing non-U.S. earnings for multinationals and raising the hurdle rate for U.S. investment.
Air cargo capacity constraints
Middle East airspace restrictions and reduced passenger flights tighten belly-hold capacity, raising rates and elongating lead times. Disruptions reportedly removed ~18% of global air-freight capacity temporarily, forcing prioritization of essential goods and shifting volumes to sea or land.
Iran shock: energy and logistics
Strait of Hormuz disruption risks higher oil, LNG and shipping costs for an energy-import-dependent economy. Korea sources about 70.7% of crude and 20.4% of LNG from the Middle East; rerouting can add 3–5 days and raise freight 50–80%.
Hormuz shock hits energy costs
Strait of Hormuz disruption and Qatar LNG outages are pushing oil above US$110–120 and Asian LNG prices sharply higher, forcing subsidies and conservation. Expect higher logistics and manufacturing costs, power-price volatility, and tighter hedging for importers and exporters.
Power and gas circular debt reforms
Pakistan seeks IMF approval to retire Rs1.5tr gas circular debt over three years via SOE dividends, LNG savings and a Rs5/litre fuel levy. Tariff adjustments and subsidy caps raise input costs and reliability risks for manufacturers and investors.
Trade reorientation toward United States
US imports from Taiwan hit $24.7B in Dec 2025 versus China $21.1B, while Taiwan’s US trade deficit reached about $147B. AI hardware demand is driving this shift, benefiting exporters but heightening exposure to US policy, audits, and localization demands.
Monetary policy uncertainty and capital costs
Fed minutes show two-sided risk: inflation near 2.4–2.9% keeps cuts uncertain and raises tail risk of tighter policy if tariffs or energy shocks lift prices. Higher-for-longer rates affect U.S. demand, project finance, FX and inventory carrying costs globally.
UK–EU agrifood SPS reset
The UK is negotiating an EU sanitary and phytosanitary agreement with a call for information and a target start around mid‑2027. Aim is to remove most certificates and checks GB→NI, cutting frictions after a 22% fall in UK agrifood exports since 2018 (~£4bn).
Tariff Regime Rebuild Uncertainty
Washington’s post-Supreme Court tariff reset is the dominant trade risk. New Section 301 probes covering 16 partners and forced-labor scrutiny across 60 countries could replace temporary 10% duties by July, disrupting sourcing, pricing, customs compliance, and cross-border investment planning.