Nonbank credit and private markets substitution

As banks pull back, private credit and direct lenders fill financing gaps, often at higher spreads and with tighter covenants. This shifts refinancing risk to less transparent markets, raising cost of capital for midmarket firms that anchor US supply chains and overseas procurement networks.

Border crossings and movement constraints

Rafah’s limited reopening and intensive screening regimes underscore persistent frictions in people movement and (indirectly) trade flows. Firms relying on regional staff mobility, humanitarian/contractor access, or cross-border services should plan for sudden closures, enhanced vetting and longer lead times.

Regulatory shocks at borders

Abrupt implementation of Decree 46 food-safety inspections stranded 700+ consignments (~300,000 tonnes) and left 1,800+ containers stuck at Cat Lai port, exposing clearance fragility. Firms should plan for sudden rule changes, longer lead times, higher testing costs and contingency warehousing.

Supply chain resilience and logistics

Tariff-driven front-loading, shifting sourcing geographies, and periodic transport disruptions are increasing inventory costs and lead-time variability. Firms are redesigning networks—splitting production, adding redundancy, and diversifying ports and carriers—raising working capital needs but reducing single-point failure exposure.

De-dollarisation and local-currency settlement

Russian officials report near‑100% national‑currency use in trade with China and India and ~90% within the EAEU, reducing USD/EUR reliance. For foreign firms, FX convertibility, hedging, and repatriation complexity rise, especially where correspondent banking access is constrained.

LNG export surge and permitting

DOE/FERC are accelerating LNG export permitting and returning applications to “regular order,” driving new capacity filings (e.g., Corpus Christi expansion) and long-term 15–20 year contracts. Benefits include energy supply diversification; risks include oversupply and price volatility by 2030.

War economy, fiscal pressure, interventionism

Russia’s war economy features high state direction, widening deficits, and elevated inflation/interest rates (reported 16% policy rate). Authorities may raise taxes, impose administrative controls, and steer credit toward defense priorities, increasing payment delays, contract renegotiations, and operational unpredictability for remaining investors.

Financial fragmentation and crypto rails

Russia-linked actors are expanding alternative payment channels, including ruble-linked crypto instruments and third-country gateways, while EU/UK target crypto platforms to close circumvention. For businesses, settlement risk rises: blocked transfers, enhanced KYC/AML scrutiny, and sudden counterparty de-risking by banks and exchanges.

Nearshoring meets security costs

Nearshoring continues to favor northern industrial corridors, but cartel violence, kidnappings and extortion elevate operating costs and duty-of-care requirements. Firms face higher spending on private security, cargo theft mitigation and workforce safety, shaping site selection, insurance and logistics routing decisions.

Defense build-up reshapes industry

La hausse des crédits militaires (+6,5 à +6,7 Md€, budget armées ~57,2 Md€) accélère commandes (sous-marins, blindés, missiles) et renforce exigences de conformité, sécurité et souveraineté. Opportunités pour fournisseurs, mais arbitrages budgétaires pèsent sur autres programmes d’investissement.

Energy transition meets grid constraints

Renewables are growing rapidly, yet Brazil curtailed roughly 20% of wind/solar output in 2025 with estimated losses around BRL 6.5bn, reflecting grid bottlenecks. Investors must factor transmission availability, curtailment clauses and regulatory responses into projects and PPAs.

Rising funding costs, liquidity swings

Short-term liquidity tightened around Tet, pushing interbank rates sharply higher and prompting widespread deposit-rate hikes; Agribank lifted longer tenors up to 6%. Higher financing costs can squeeze working capital, pressure leveraged sectors, and raise hurdle rates for projects.

Sanctions escalation and secondary tariffs

U.S. “maximum pressure” is tightening via new designations of tankers/entities and a threatened 25% tariff on countries trading with Iran. This widens compliance exposure beyond Iran-facing firms, raising legal, financing, and market-access risks across global supply chains.

Domestic demand fragility and policy swings

Weak property and local-government finance dynamics keep domestic demand uneven, encouraging policy stimulus and sector interventions. For foreign investors, this raises forecasting error, payment and counterparty risk, and the likelihood of sudden regulatory actions targeting pricing, procurement, or competition.

Privatisation and SOE restructuring

Government plans broader privatisation after PIA and targets loss-making SOEs to reduce fiscal drain. Transaction structure, governance and regulatory clarity will shape opportunities in aviation, energy distribution and logistics, while policy reversals could elevate political and contract risk.

Escalating sanctions and secondary risk

The EU’s 20th package expands energy, banking and trade restrictions, adding 43 shadow-fleet vessels (around 640 total) plus more regional and third‑country banks. This raises secondary-sanctions exposure, contract frustration risk, and compliance costs for global firms transacting with Russia-linked counterparts.

UK-Russia sanctions escalation compliance

The UK is tightening Russia measures, including designations and a planned ban on maritime services (transport, insurance) supporting Russian LNG to third countries, alongside a lower oil price cap. This elevates due-diligence needs for shipping, energy, and finance.

India–EU FTA reshapes access

India and the EU signed a major free trade agreement expected to reduce or eliminate tariffs on most traded goods by value and deepen standards alignment. This expands market access and diversification options, pressuring competitors and influencing supply-chain site selection and investment sequencing.

Semiconductor Tariffs and Industrial Policy

The US is combining higher chip tariffs with conditional exemptions tied to domestic capacity commitments, using firms like TSMC as leverage. A 25% tariff on certain advanced chips raises costs short‑term but accelerates fab investment decisions and reshapes electronics sourcing strategies.

Energy investment and nuclear cooperation linkage

US pushes Korea’s first $350bn investment projects toward energy, while trade tensions spill into talks on civil uranium enrichment, spent-fuel reprocessing, and nuclear-powered submarines. Outcomes affect Korea’s energy-security roadmap, industrial projects, and cross-border financing and permitting timelines.

Commodity price volatility, capacity stress

Downstream processing economics are challenged by price swings (e.g., lithium refining closures) despite strategic policy support. International partners should structure flexible offtakes, consider tolling/hedging, and evaluate counterparty resilience, as consolidation and state-backed support reshape the sector.

Secondary Sanctions via Tariffs

Washington is expanding coercive tools beyond classic sanctions, including threats of blanket tariffs on countries trading with Iran. For multinationals, this elevates third-country exposure, drives deeper counterparty screening, and can force rapid rerouting of trade, logistics, and energy procurement.

China trade détente, geopolitical scrutiny

Canada’s partial tariff reset with China (notably EV quotas and agri tariff relief) improves market access for canola/seafood but heightens U.S. concerns about transshipment and “non-market economy” links. Expect tighter investment screening, procurement scrutiny, and reputational due diligence.

Tariffs and China tech controls

Washington is tightening trade defenses via higher tariffs and expanding export controls, especially around semiconductors and China-linked supply chains. Companies should expect cost volatility, licensing risk, and compliance burdens, plus accelerated “friend-shoring” and domestic-content requirements for critical technologies.

BRICS payments push sanctions exposure

Brazil’s joint statement with Russia criticising unilateral sanctions and promoting local-currency settlement comes as bilateral trade reached US$10.9bn in 2025. Firms must strengthen sanctions screening, banking counterparties and shipping/insurance checks to avoid secondary-sanctions and compliance disruptions.

Energy policy and OPEC+ restraint

Saudi-led OPEC+ is keeping output hikes paused through March 2026, maintaining quotas amid surplus concerns and Iran-related volatility. For businesses, oil revenue sensitivity influences public spending, FX liquidity, project pacing, and input costs, especially energy-intensive industries.

Data protection compliance tightening

Draft DPDP rules and proposed faster compliance timelines raise near-term operational and legal burdens, especially for multinationals and potential “Significant Data Fiduciaries.” Unclear thresholds and cross-border transfer mechanisms increase compliance risk, contract renegotiations, and potential localization-style costs.

Tariff regime and legal uncertainty

Trump-era broad tariffs face Supreme Court and congressional challenges, creating volatile landed costs and contract risk. Average tariffs rose from 2.6% to 13% in 2025; potential refunds could exceed $130B, complicating pricing, sourcing, and inventory strategies.

LNG export acceleration and energy leverage

Policy has shifted toward faster approvals and “regular order” for non‑FTA LNG export permits, supporting 15–20 year contracting with Europe and Asia. This boosts US energy geopolitics, but creates competitiveness and price-risk considerations for energy‑intensive manufacturers globally.

Nickel quota cuts, ore scarcity

Indonesia is slashing nickel ore RKAB quotas—targeting ~250–260m wet tons vs 379m in 2025—and ordering major mines like Weda Bay to cut output. Smelters may face feedstock deficits, driving imports (15.84m tons in 2025) and price volatility.

Mining law and licensing uncertainty

The Mineral Resources Development Amendment Bill has been criticized for ambiguity, while debates over BEE conditions, beneficiation and application timelines continue. Exploration spend fell to about R781m in 2024 (from R6.2bn in 2006), constraining future output and investor appetite.

India trade deals intensify competition

India’s new EU deal and evolving US tariff arrangements reduce Pakistan’s historical preference cushion, especially in textiles and made-ups. European and US buyers may renegotiate prices and lead times, pressuring margins and accelerating shifts toward higher value-add, reliability, and compliance performance.

Rupiah volatility and import costs

The rupiah’s depreciation episodes and tight monetary stance can raise hedging costs and complicate pricing for import-dependent sectors. Businesses should expect periodic FX-driven margin pressure, potential administrative frictions, and greater emphasis on local sourcing and USD liquidity management.

Geopolitical risk: Taiwan routes

Persistent Taiwan Strait tensions elevate insurance premiums, rerouting risk, and contingency planning needs for shipping and air freight. A crisis would disrupt semiconductor-linked supply chains and regional production networks, prompting customers to demand dual-sourcing and higher inventories.

EV manufacturing shift and competition

Thailand’s EV ramp-up is rapid: 2025 BEV production +632% to 70,914 units; sales +80% to 120,301. Chinese-linked supply chains expand as legacy OEMs rationalize capacity. Opportunities rise in batteries, components, and charging, alongside policy and localization requirements.

Weaponized finance and sanctions risk

US investigations into sanctioned actors using crypto and stablecoins highlight expanding enforcement across digital rails. For cross-border businesses, this raises screening obligations, counterparty risk, and potential payment disruptions, especially in high-risk corridors connected to Iran or Russia.