Mission Grey Daily Brief - August 16, 2024

Summary of the Global Situation for Businesses and Investors

The ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia continues to shape the global landscape, with Ukrainian troops advancing into Russian territory and launching drone attacks on Russian airbases. Meanwhile, the Kremlin is tightening its grip on information, blocking access to YouTube and messaging apps. In North Korea, Kim Jong Un's response to devastating floods reveals his fear of South Korean influence, while in Afghanistan, the Taliban's crackdown on media and information access continues, with journalists facing escalating challenges and restrictions. The US election campaign is heating up, with Iran and Russia intensifying their cyberattack and disinformation efforts, and China waging a global public opinion war with the US. Lastly, there are positive signs in the US economy, with retail sales jumping by 1% in July and unemployment claims falling.

Ukraine-Russia Conflict

Ukrainian forces have made significant advances in the Kursk region of Russia, taking control of about 1,000 square kilometers of Russian territory and launching drone attacks on several Russian airbases. This unexpected move has seemingly caught the Kremlin off guard, and their propaganda response has been improvised and inconsistent. While Russian officials claim the situation is under control, hundreds of Russian soldiers have been captured, and up to 200,000 civilians have fled their homes. The Kremlin has started sending reinforcements to the region, but their response has been described as slow and poorly coordinated. This development underscores the resilience and determination of Ukraine and is likely to have a significant impact on the public perception of the war, both in Russia and internationally.

Information Control in Russia

The Kremlin is intensifying its efforts to control the flow of information within Russia, blocking access to YouTube and targeting messaging apps such as Signal and WhatsApp. This follows earlier restrictions on major Western social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. By disrupting access to popular platforms, the Kremlin aims to prevent Russians from accessing information that contradicts its official narrative, particularly regarding the invasion of Ukraine. This crackdown on free speech is part of a broader campaign to dominate the domestic information space and eliminate independent media in Russia, with Vladimir Putin creating a powerful propaganda machine to legitimize his dictatorial rule and mobilize public support for the war.

North Korea's Response to Floods

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un's recent response to devastating floods in his country has exposed his anxiety over the influence of South Korea and the increasing flow of information into the isolated nation. Kim's rare direct criticism of South Korean media, accusing them of spreading fake news about the flooding, highlights his fear of outside influence and his attempts to discredit and limit South Korean influence among North Koreans. This also reflects Kim's refusal to accept humanitarian aid from South Korea, instead stressing North Korea's self-reliance. Kim's actions are likely shaped by his concern over the regime's incapability to deal with the disaster and his efforts to contain dissatisfaction among the North Korean people.

Media Crackdown in Afghanistan

Three years after the Taliban's takeover of Afghanistan, journalists and media workers continue to face escalating challenges, including intimidation, censorship, and a relentless crackdown on independent journalism. The Taliban has imposed strict controls on traditional and social media platforms, requiring Afghan journalists to have their stories approved by Taliban officials and banning content deemed 'contrary to Islam'. As a result, Afghanistan has witnessed the closure of more than half of its media outlets, and female journalists have been particularly affected, with nearly 80% losing their jobs due to the Taliban's draconian restrictions. The situation has been further exacerbated by the collapse of transparent governance and the absence of independent media, severely affecting Afghan lives and the humanitarian crisis in the country.

Risks and Opportunities

Risk: The ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia, with Ukraine's recent advances into Russian territory, poses risks of further escalation and potential spillover effects on neighboring countries. Businesses operating in the region should monitor the situation closely and be prepared for potential disruptions.
Opportunity: The US economy is showing signs of resilience, with increased consumer spending and a stable jobs market. This provides opportunities for businesses to capitalize on consumer confidence and invest in growth strategies.
Risk: North Korea's response to the floods and Kim Jong Un's anxiety over outside influence suggest a continued resistance to opening up and engaging with the international community. Businesses should approach any potential investments or trade with caution, considering the unpredictable nature of the regime.
Risk: The Taliban's crackdown on media and information access in Afghanistan undermines transparency and accountability, creating an unstable environment for businesses. Operating in Afghanistan carries significant risks related to censorship, intimidation, and arbitrary detention.

Recommendations for Businesses and Investors

Businesses and investors should closely monitor the evolving situations in Ukraine, Russia, North Korea, and Afghanistan. While there may be opportunities in the US market due to positive economic indicators, caution is advised in the other regions. Diversifying operations and supply chains away from these high-risk areas can reduce exposure to potential disruptions. Additionally, businesses should prioritize risk mitigation strategies, including contingency plans and alternative supply sources, to navigate the challenging environments in these countries.

Themes around the World:

US-China Trade Tensions Escalate

Renewed tariff threats and secondary sanctions on China, especially over Iranian oil, have reignited US-China trade tensions. US imports from China dropped 28% and exports fell 38% in 2025, disrupting global supply chains and prompting sourcing shifts to Southeast Asia.

Critical Minerals and Battery Supply Chains

Major investments in domestic lithium refining and battery materials, backed by the Canada Growth Fund, BMW, and Breakthrough Energy, aim to secure Canada’s role in the global EV supply chain. These efforts reduce reliance on overseas processing and support North American clean energy ambitions.

Climate Transition and Fossil Fuel Dependence

Despite climate commitments, South Africa is expanding domestic gas and coal projects, risking stranded assets and exposure to carbon border taxes. This tension between energy security and sustainability creates regulatory uncertainty and reputational risks for international partners and investors.

Currency Volatility and Fiscal Reforms

The South African rand has shown recent strength, supported by improved fiscal management, credit rating upgrades, and inflation control. However, volatility remains a risk, influenced by global economic shifts, policy changes, and domestic fiscal vulnerabilities, affecting import costs and investment planning.

USMCA, nearshoring, and critical minerals

Nearshoring to Mexico/Canada is accelerating, reinforced by U.S. critical-mineral initiatives and stricter origin enforcement. This benefits firms that regionalize supply chains, but raises audit burdens for rules-of-origin, labor content, and ESG traceability—especially in autos and batteries.

Critical Minerals Strategy and Supply Chain Security

Australia is rapidly expanding its critical minerals sector, prioritizing rare earths, gallium, and scandium. Strategic reserves and Western partnerships aim to reduce dependence on China, shaping investment, supply chain resilience, and global competitiveness in clean energy and technology.

Supply Chain Vulnerabilities Persist

Supply chain disruptions have eased but remain a concern, especially in sectors reliant on semiconductors and critical materials. Geopolitical tensions, particularly US-China and EU-US, continue to threaten the stability and resilience of German and European supply chains.

Consumption tax reform rollout

Implementation of the new dual VAT (CBS/IBS) and selective tax advances, with a testing phase starting in 2026 and long transition. Firms face significant ERP, pricing, contracting and cash‑flow changes as non-cumulativity expands and sectoral carve‑outs evolve.

Critical Supply Chain Vulnerabilities

The UK’s over-reliance on China for clean energy components and critical minerals exposes supply chains to geopolitical shocks. Disruptions could threaten up to 90,000 jobs and delay renewable energy projects, prompting calls for domestic production and diversified international partnerships.

Debt Management and Fiscal Sustainability Challenges

Egypt’s reliance on local and international debt issuance remains high, with EGP 843 billion in local debt planned for February 2025 and $2 billion in international bonds for FY 2025/26. Fiscal sustainability concerns persist, influencing sovereign risk and borrowing costs.

Information Blackouts and Operational Challenges

Authorities have imposed extended internet and communication shutdowns, impeding business operations, financial transactions, and supply chain visibility. These blackouts complicate crisis management, due diligence, and compliance monitoring for international firms.

US Secondary Sanctions and Iran Trade

A new US executive order imposes a 25% tariff on countries trading with Iran, directly impacting Turkey’s exporters and supply chains. This policy creates compliance risks, potential trade diversion, and higher costs for Turkish businesses with US market exposure.

Supply Chain Diversification and Resilience

Amid US tariffs and rising protectionism, China has diversified export markets and supply chains, boosting trade with ASEAN, Africa, and Latin America. However, supply chain ‘reallocation’ through third countries keeps China central to global manufacturing, complicating true decoupling efforts.

Water scarcity and treaty pressures

Drought dynamics and cross-border water-delivery politics are resurfacing as an operational constraint for industrial hubs, especially in the north. Water availability now affects site selection, permitting, and ESG risk, pushing investment into recycling, treatment and alternative sourcing.

Resilience and Diversification of Manufacturing

TSMC and other Taiwanese firms are accelerating overseas expansion, notably in the US, Germany, and Japan, to mitigate geopolitical and operational risks. While Taiwan remains the core hub, a gradual shift in advanced manufacturing capacity abroad is underway.

Persistent Supply Chain Disruptions

US supply chains continue to experience disruptions from geopolitical tensions, natural disasters, and infrastructure bottlenecks. Companies must invest in resilience, diversify suppliers, and adopt new technologies to mitigate risks and maintain operational continuity.

Global Supply Chain Realignment

US tariff policies and geopolitical frictions have accelerated the diversification of supply chains away from China. Southeast Asian countries, notably Indonesia and Thailand, gained significant US sourcing share in 2025, reshaping manufacturing and logistics strategies for international businesses.

Shifting Energy Trade Flows to Asia

India and Turkey have reduced Russian fossil fuel imports due to sanctions, while China has increased purchases, benefiting from steep discounts. These shifts are altering global supply chains, with China now accounting for nearly half of Russia’s fossil fuel export revenues, impacting trade patterns and pricing.

China trade détente, geopolitical scrutiny

Canada’s partial tariff reset with China (notably EV quotas and agri tariff relief) improves market access for canola/seafood but heightens U.S. concerns about transshipment and “non-market economy” links. Expect tighter investment screening, procurement scrutiny, and reputational due diligence.

EV incentives and industrial policy resets

Les dispositifs de soutien aux véhicules électriques se reconfigurent: fin du leasing social après 50 000 véhicules, ajustements de bonus et débats fiscaux (malus masse EV lourd supprimé). Cela crée volatilité de la demande, impacts sur chaînes auto, batteries, réseau et occasion.

USMCA review and tariff brinkmanship

The mandatory USMCA review and renewed U.S. tariff threats create high uncertainty for North American supply chains, especially autos, metals and agri-food. Firms should stress-test rules-of-origin compliance, pricing, and contingency routing as policy shifts can be abrupt.

Tariff volatility and legal risk

Rapidly shifting “reciprocal” tariffs and sector duties (autos, lumber, pharma, semiconductors) are raising landed costs and contract risk. Pending court challenges to tariff authorities add uncertainty, pushing firms toward contingency pricing, sourcing diversification, and accelerated customs planning.

Infrastructure and Construction Safety Risks

Major infrastructure projects face delays due to safety incidents and regulatory scrutiny, as seen in the recent halting of 14 construction projects after crane accidents. Such disruptions affect supply chains, logistics, and investor confidence in Thailand’s project delivery capacity.

Cyber and physical security exposure

Critical infrastructure targeting increases cyber and sabotage risks for telecoms, utilities, ports and industrial firms. Businesses should expect greater downtime probability, stricter security protocols, and higher compliance costs for data, critical equipment, and dual-use supply chains.

German Investment Shift: US to China

German direct investment in the US fell by 45% in 2025, while investment in China surged to over €7 billion. Uncertainty from US trade policy and pressure from Chinese authorities are prompting German firms to localize production and supply chains in China, affecting global business operations.

Domestic Growth Relies on Exports

China’s 5% GDP growth in 2025 was mainly export-driven, with weak domestic consumption and investment. Authorities aim to boost domestic demand and technological self-reliance, but future growth remains vulnerable to external trade pressures and global demand shifts.

Trade Policy Uncertainty and Diversification

US tariffs (currently 19%) and global trade tensions are prompting Thailand to diversify export markets beyond the US and China. Efforts to expand FTAs, streamline certification, and access India and the Middle East are central to trade resilience and supply chain adaptation.

Political Volatility and Diplomatic Strategy

President Sheinbaum’s approach to US relations emphasizes dialogue, sovereignty, and adaptability in the face of unpredictable US policy shifts. Ongoing communication with President Trump and Canadian leaders is crucial for maintaining trade stability and managing bilateral crises.

Labor Market Reforms and Nationalization

Saudi Arabia’s labor market reforms, including workforce nationalization and global labor agreements, affect talent acquisition, compliance, and cost structures. Companies must adapt to evolving employment regulations and localization requirements to sustain operations.

Infrastructure Expansion and Social Conflict

Major infrastructure projects, such as the Santos-Guarujá tunnel and Amazon waterways, are advancing, attracting foreign investment and improving logistics. However, these projects face social resistance, especially from Indigenous groups, due to environmental and land rights concerns.

Critical Minerals Supply Chain Resilience

Japan is aggressively diversifying its critical minerals and rare earths supply, launching deep-sea mining projects and forging new partnerships with the EU, Italy, and India. These efforts aim to reduce dependency on China, which controls about 60-70% of global rare earth supply, safeguarding manufacturing and technology sectors.

UK-EU supply chain re-fragmentation

EU ‘Made in Europe’ industrial rules risk excluding UK firms from subsidised value chains, potentially raising costs and disrupting integrated automotive, advanced-tech and green-energy supply chains spanning Britain and the continent, complicating investment planning and post‑Brexit trade resets.

Industrial policy reshapes investment maps

CHIPS, IRA, and related subsidy programs are steering manufacturing and energy investment into the U.S., but with strict domestic-content and “foreign entity of concern” limits. Multinationals must align capex, JV structures, and supplier qualification to retain incentives and avoid clawbacks.

Industrial policy and subsidy conditions

CHIPS Act and IRA-era incentives keep steering investment toward U.S. manufacturing and clean energy, often with domestic-content, labor, and sourcing requirements. This reshapes site selection and supplier qualification, while creating tax-credit transfer opportunities and compliance burdens for global operators.

Disaster and BCP-driven supply chains

Japan’s exposure to earthquakes and extreme weather is pushing stricter business-continuity planning and inventory strategies. Companies are investing in automated, earthquake-resilient logistics hubs and longer lead-time services to dampen disruption risk, affecting warehousing footprints, insurance costs, and supplier qualification.

Energy Transition and Green Ammonia Expansion

Japan is leading Asia in green ammonia co-firing projects and renewable energy investments, targeting decarbonization of power generation. Major projects and international supply agreements position Japan as a regional leader in clean energy, with significant implications for energy-intensive industries and supply chains.